[Photostimulation plates or conventional films for bedside chest x-ray in pediatric radiology? A comparative study of quality of image and the dose delivered to patients]

J Radiol. 1996 Nov;77(11):1129-34.
[Article in French]

Abstract

Image quality and patient doses received during chest bedside examinations performed with conventional (film-screen combination) and photostimulable phosphorus plate systems were compared in a study carried out in 1993 in a French pediatric radiology department. Seventy one children (36 males and 35 females) aged between 9 days and 18 years (average: 43 months) were included in the study. Technical performances of all radiological equipment used were permanently checked through a quality control program. One conventional and 3 "photostimulable" films were performed for each patient included (mAs product selected for "photostimulable" system was progressively reduced down to 60% of that of conventional technique). TLD Lithium Fluoride chips were used to measure entrance surface dose during the examination. Image quality of 284 films (213 "photostimulable" + 71 conventional) was assessed by three independent radiologists. Advantages and drawbacks of both studied imaging techniques are discussed in terms of patient dose reduction and image quality.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Age Factors
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Intensive Care Units, Pediatric
  • Male
  • Quality Control
  • Radiation Dosage
  • Radiography, Thoracic / instrumentation*
  • X-Ray Film*
  • X-Ray Intensifying Screens*