In this study, the Cochlear Implant Programme of the ENT Department of Ospedale Civile di Venezia, is presented. Between 1989 and 1994, after a rigorous selection process, 36 patients were selected to be implanted with a cochlear prostheses: 28 with the multichannel Nucleus 22 device, 5 with the Clarion implant and 3 with the single channel Med-E1 BTE device. The distribution of the patients according to age, etiology, duration of auditory deprivation, age at onset of deafness, is presented. The different speech-coding strategies of the Nucleus system (Wearable Speech Processing, Multipeak speech processing and Spectral Maximum Sound processor) and the stimulation mode (common ground, bipolar, bipolar + 1) as well as the Clarion speech coding strategy (Continuous Interleaved Samples and Compressed Analog) are briefly discussed. The rehabilitation programme, the specific speech recognition assessment test batteries-Consonant Confusion Test, Vocal Confusion Test, Speech Tracking, MAC battery-as they are employed in our department, are presented. As we have analyzed our results, certain factors appear as predicting a favourable outcome: - age of onset of deafness; postlingual patients, who have developed communication skills compare favourably to the perilingual group. - durations of auditory deprivation, as it is related to surviving cells in the cochlea: the shorter the period of deafness, the better the results. - length of electrode insertion, as it is determined by ossification of the cochlea. - high dynamic range of the MAP. - percent of activated electrodes: a number of 10 active electrodes or less predicts a poor outcome. - for simplification reasons, a new variable is introduced-Auditory Deprivation Index- and its positive correlation to the performance presented. - the time period of experience with the device, length and quality of rehabilitation and family support have to be mentioned.