Detection of anabolic steroid administration: ratio of urinary testosterone to epitestosterone vs the ratio of urinary testosterone to luteinizing hormone

Clin Chem. 1997 May;43(5):731-5.

Abstract

Our goal in this study was to determine whether the urinary ratio of testosterone to luteinizing hormone (T/LH) as an indicator of exogenous anabolic steroid (AS) use is superior to the urinary ratio of testosterone to epitestosterone (T/E). After 2 weekly placebo injections, 19 subjects were given testosterone cypionate (TC) injections of 250 or 500 mg/week for 14 weeks followed by 14 weekly placebo injections. Patients were considered to have ceased taking TC if they tested negative 9 weeks after their last injection. For detection of illicit or supraphysiological TC (AS) use, the urinary T/E ratio of > or = 6 yielded a false-negative rate of 46% and a false-positive rate of 4%. However, a urinary T/LH ratio of > or = 30 produced a false-negative rate of only 24% and a false-positive rate of 13%. We conclude that the urinary T/LH ratio of > or = 30 is a more sensitive marker of AS use than the urinary T/E ratio of > or = 6 and remains sensitive for twice as long as urinary T/E.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Anabolic Agents*
  • Doping in Sports*
  • Epitestosterone / urine*
  • False Negative Reactions
  • Humans
  • Kinetics
  • Luteinizing Hormone / urine*
  • Male
  • Substance Abuse Detection / methods*
  • Testosterone / urine*

Substances

  • Anabolic Agents
  • Testosterone
  • Epitestosterone
  • Luteinizing Hormone