Periprosthetic bone remodelling after cementless total hip replacement. A prospective comparison of two different implant designs

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997 Jul;79(4):675-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.79b4.7410.

Abstract

In a prospective study of 14 patients undergoing total hip replacement we have used dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) to investigate remodelling of the bone around two different designs of cementless femoral prosthesis. The bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at 12-weekly intervals for a year. Eight patients (group A) had a stiff, collarless implant and six (group B) a flexible isoelastic implant. Patients in group A showed a decrease in BMD from 14 weeks after operation. By 12 months, the mean loss in BMD was 27%, both medially and laterally to the proximal part of the implant. Those in group B showed an overall increase in BMD which reached a mean of 12.6% on the lateral side of the distal portion of the implant. Our results support the current concepts of the effects of stem stiffness and flexibility on periprosthetic remodelling.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Bone Density
  • Bone Remodeling*
  • Cementation
  • Female
  • Hip Prosthesis / methods*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Prosthesis Design