CT angiography versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for assessment of aortoiliac occlusive disease

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Oct;169(4):1133-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.169.4.9308477.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of CT angiography (CTA) with a single helical acquisition for assessment of stenoses and occlusions of the iliac arteries.

Subjects and methods: In our prospective study, intraarterial digital subtraction angiography and IV CTA were performed from the suprarenal aorta to below the femoral bifurcation in 30 patients with vascular occlusive disease. Maximum-intensity-projection images in multiple views were also obtained. The accuracy of CTA with and without analysis of axial images was determined.

Results: Sensitivity and specificity of CTA were 100% for iliac artery occlusions with a confidence interval 85-100% and 97-100%, respectively. When axial scans were interpreted, 14 of 15 high-grade (> 75%) stenoses were recognized. Sensitivity and specificity of CTA were 93% (range, 68-100%) and 99% (range, 97-100%), respectively. When maximum intensity projections alone were analyzed, sensitivity for the diagnosis of 15 high-grade stenoses was only 53% (range, 27-79%) because calcified plaques obscured six stenoses.

Conclusions: CTA accurately reveals iliac artery occlusions. Observers of CT angiograms may overlook short stenoses in rare instances. Calcified plaques limit the use of maximum-intensity-projection images.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Angiography
  • Angiography, Digital Subtraction*
  • Aorta, Abdominal / diagnostic imaging*
  • Aortic Diseases / diagnostic imaging*
  • Arterial Occlusive Diseases / diagnostic imaging*
  • Humans
  • Iliac Artery / diagnostic imaging*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Observer Variation
  • Prospective Studies
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed*