Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: comparison between u-hFSH conventional protocol and a personalized approach

Int J Fertil Womens Med. 1997 Jul-Aug;42(4):264-7.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the therapeutic effectiveness in infertile couples with anovulatory, mild endometriosis-related and unexplained infertility of a personalized approach to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) (group A) on the basis of body mass index (BMI) and waist/hip ratio (WHR) in comparison to a conventional protocol (group B).

Results: In group A, we obtained a significantly higher pregnancy rate and number of multifollicular cycles in comparison to group B. In addition, the pregnancy rate/ovulatory cycle and the number of ovulatory cycles were higher (but not significantly) in group A. In group B, we observed a not significantly higher number of monofollicular cycles and required length of stimulation in comparison to group A.

Conclusion: A personalized therapeutic protocol, based on simple criteria such as BMI and WHR, leads to a higher number of single and twin pregnancies, without any significant increase of higher grade multiple pregnancies or severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Body Mass Index
  • Chi-Square Distribution
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
  • Female
  • Fertility Agents, Female / administration & dosage*
  • Follicle Stimulating Hormone / administration & dosage*
  • Humans
  • Infertility, Female / diagnostic imaging
  • Infertility, Female / drug therapy*
  • Infertility, Female / etiology
  • Menotropins / administration & dosage*
  • Ovulation / drug effects
  • Ovulation / physiology
  • Polycystic Ovary Syndrome / complications
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy Rate
  • Ultrasonography

Substances

  • Fertility Agents, Female
  • Menotropins
  • Follicle Stimulating Hormone