[CT angiography in arterial occlusive disease: comparison of 3 rendering techniques]

Rofo. 1997 Oct;167(4):361-70. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1015545.
[Article in German]

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate different rendering techniques of CT data for the assessment of long vessel segments in peripheral vascular occlusive disease.

Material and methods: 40 CT angiograms (aortoiliac: n = 20, leg arteries: n = 20) were viewed using three different rendering techniques: 1, maximum intensity projection (MIP); 2, volume rendering (VR); 3, shaded surface display (SSD). CT angiograms were obtained in 6 or 8 projections. Axial cross-section images were analysed using an interactive cine mode. Intraarterial DSA was the standard in all cases.

Results: The sensitivities for the diagnosis of occlusive disease were 100% (cross-section images), 94% (MIP), 91% (VR) and 93% (SSD). The specificities were 100%, 99%, 99% and 99%, respectively. For the accurate grading of high-grade (> 75%) stenoses, the sensitivities were 85% (cross-section images), 62% (MIP), 44% (VR) and 35% (SSD). Specificity was 99% for all techniques.

Conclusions: CTA is accurate in occlusive disease. Interactive viewing of cross-section images is the most accurate technique. MIP is superior to VR in the imaging of high-grade stenoses because contrast-to-noise ratio is high and thresholding is not necessary.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Angiography, Digital Subtraction*
  • Arterial Occlusive Diseases / diagnostic imaging*
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Evaluation Studies as Topic
  • Humans
  • Leg / blood supply*
  • Leriche Syndrome / diagnostic imaging
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / methods*