Lower-pole caliceal stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and flexible ureteroscopy: impact of radiographic spatial anatomy

J Endourol. 1998 Apr;12(2):113-9. doi: 10.1089/end.1998.12.113.

Abstract

Spatial anatomy of the lower renal pole, as defined by the infundibulopelvic angle (LIP angle), infundibular length (IL), and infundibular width (IW), plays a significant role in the stone-free rate after shockwave lithotripsy. A wide LIP angle, a short IL, and a broad IW, individually or in combination, favor stone clearance, whereas a LIP <70 degrees, an IL >3 cm, or an IW < or =5 mm are individually unfavorable. When all three unfavorable factors or an unfavorable LIP and IL coexist, the post-SWL stone-free rate falls to 50% or less. Using these criteria, more than one fourth of our patients with a lower-pole calculus might have been better served by an initial percutaneous or perhaps ureteroscopic procedure, neither of which is significantly affected by the lower-pole spatial anatomy.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Child
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Kidney Calculi / diagnostic imaging*
  • Kidney Calculi / therapy*
  • Kidney Calices / diagnostic imaging*
  • Lithotripsy* / adverse effects
  • Male
  • Medical Illustration
  • Middle Aged
  • Nephrostomy, Percutaneous* / adverse effects
  • Radiography
  • Retreatment
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Ureteroscopy*