Statistical considerations in the design, conduct and analyses of antiemetic clinical trials. An emerging consensus

Support Care Cancer. 1998 May;6(3):261-5. doi: 10.1007/s005200050164.

Abstract

Various aspects of trial design and planning for clinical testing of antiemetic therapies administered to cancer patients are considered. It is generally felt that a randomized double-blind parallel-arm design is the best. Ways of achieving adequate power of such studies are discussed briefly, as is the need for previous identification of primary and secondary end-points. Finally, summary recommendations are given.

Publication types

  • Consensus Development Conference
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Antiemetics / adverse effects
  • Antiemetics / therapeutic use*
  • Antineoplastic Agents / adverse effects*
  • Antineoplastic Agents / therapeutic use
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Humans
  • Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / statistics & numerical data*
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Vomiting / chemically induced
  • Vomiting / drug therapy*

Substances

  • Antiemetics
  • Antineoplastic Agents