Comparison of the prognosis after early versus late recurrent nonfatal myocardial infarction. DAVIT Study Group. Danish Verapamil Infarction Trial

Am Heart J. 1998 Jul;136(1):164-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(98)70197-8.

Abstract

Background: Recurrent nonfatal myocardial infarction (RNMI) is the most significant risk factor for later outcome after an index infarction. However, little is known about the prognosis after RNMIs that occur beyond the first year after the index infarction.

Methods and results: In 3867 nonselected patients <76 years old with an acute myocardial infarction, we studied the rate of and prognosis after a first RNMI, depending on the year of its occurrence after the index infarction. Mortality rate was estimated by the method of Kaplan-Meier, and the differences were evaluated by means of the Tarone-Ware test. Four hundred ninety-three (13.6%) patients had a first RNMI in the first, 151 (5.4%) in the second, 105 (4.2%) in the third, and 71 (3.8%) in the fourth year after the index infarction (groups 1 through 4). One-year mortality rate after RNMI was 23.7% in the first group, 24.1% in the second group, 17.5% in the third group, and 22.8 in the fourth group. When all the groups were compared with each other, no significant difference was found between the mortality rates (p = 0.12) or standardized mortality rates.

Conclusions: Late RNMIs have almost the same grave prognosis as do early RNMIs.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Clinical Trial, Phase II
  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Denmark / epidemiology
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Myocardial Infarction / mortality*
  • Myocardial Infarction / prevention & control
  • Prognosis
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Secondary Prevention
  • Survival Rate
  • Vasodilator Agents / therapeutic use
  • Verapamil / therapeutic use

Substances

  • Vasodilator Agents
  • Verapamil