Relative importance of mothers' versus medical staffs' behavior in the prediction of infant immunization pain behavior

J Pediatr Psychol. 1998 Aug;23(4):249-56. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/23.4.249.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the relative importance of mothers' versus medical staffs' behavior in the prediction of infant pain during routine immunization.

Methods: We video-recorded 60 infants' 6- or 18-month immunizations. Recordings were used to code infant pain behavior using the Neonatal Facial Action Coding System (NFCS, R. V. E. Grunau & K. D. Craig, 1987), and maternal and staff vocalizations using the Child-Adult Medical Procedure Interaction Scale-Revised (CAMPIS-R, R. L. Blount, J. W. Sturges, & S. W. Powers, 1990).

Results: Maternal and staff vocalizations showed different patterns of relation with infant pain behavior, depending upon the type of vocalization. Mothers' distress-promoting behavior (e.g., reassurance) predicted increased infant pain behavior, while staffs' coping-promoting behavior (e.g., distraction) predicted decreased infant pain behavior.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Immunization
  • Infant
  • Infant Behavior*
  • Injections, Intramuscular / adverse effects
  • Injections, Intramuscular / psychology*
  • Male
  • Nova Scotia
  • Pain / etiology
  • Pain / psychology*
  • Parent-Child Relations*
  • Professional-Patient Relations*
  • Regression Analysis