[Permanent endoprostatic prostheses in patient with obstruction caused by benign hyperplasia of the prostate]

Actas Urol Esp. 1998 Jun;22(6):490-7; discussion 498.
[Article in Spanish]

Abstract

Presentation of the results obtained using the intraprostatic prosthesis UroLume in 78 patients wit BPH obstruction, 69 of which presented high surgical risk (ASA IV). Mean age was 79.8 years (r: 62-93). All patients carried urethral catheters, except 4 (5.1%) who had a provisional metal coil that required replacement. Prosthesis were implanted successfully in 72 cases (93.3%). The most significant exclusion criterion was an excessive length of prostate urethra. Mean follow-up was 15.3 months (r: 3-38). Mean maximum flow at 1 year after implant was 12.7 mL/sec; mean symptoms score (I-PSS score) was 6.2 points and in most prosthesis, epithelization had taken place. Three patients required implant of another prosthesis, either during the same surgical procedure (1 case) or later due to retention or dysuria (2 cases). Due to acute urine retention (AUR) during the immediate postoperative, resection of the middle lobe was performed in one case while a second case required late resection of intraluminal hyperplastic tissue. Three patients (4.1%) had haematuria that forced hospital admission some months after the implant, and three cases (4.1%) required removal of the prosthesis; at patient's request (1 case), due to calcification (1 case) and for stress incontinence (1 case). After a follow-up of over three years, it can be concluded that the UroLume prosthesis is an effective alternative to TUR in patients at high surgical risk.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Hematuria / etiology
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Stents* / adverse effects
  • Urethra*
  • Urethral Obstruction / etiology
  • Urethral Obstruction / therapy*