Radical hysterectomy with the endoscopic stapler

Gynecol Oncol. 1998 Oct;71(1):50-2. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1998.5096.

Abstract

Objective: Morbidity associated with radical hysterectomy is significant. Utilizing the endoscopic stapler for transection of the cardinal ligaments and uterosacral ligaments is a possible method to decrease operative time and blood loss.

Methods: Two groups of patients, one group with the stapler used (n = 21) and the other with the traditional method utilized (n = 18), were compared in regard to operative and postoperative morbidity, operative time, and surgical margins. The groups were similar in regard to medical condition, age, and weight.

Results: Median (243 min versus 284 min) and mean (246 min versus 287 min) operative times were significantly less in the stapler group than in the control group (P < 0.002). Median blood loss was reduced by 20% in the stapler group (400 ml versus 500 ml, P < 0.03). There was no significant difference in febrile morbidity, surgical complications, or length of hospital stay.

Conclusion: Our data suggest significant reduction in blood loss and operative time with the use of the endoscopic stapler.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial

MeSH terms

  • Blood Loss, Surgical / prevention & control
  • Humans
  • Hysterectomy / adverse effects
  • Hysterectomy / economics
  • Hysterectomy / instrumentation*
  • Length of Stay
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Surgical Staplers* / economics