[Reproducibility and prognostic value of histopathological classifications of malignant lymphomas. Prolegomena for the 1st international classification proposed by WHO. Group of the non-Hodgkin's Malignant Lymphoma Classification Project]

Bull Acad Natl Med. 1998;182(7):1537-48; discussion 1548-9.
[Article in French]

Abstract

Different histopathologic classifications have been used in the study of malignant lymphomas. The clinical relevance (reproducibility, prognostic value) has not been precisely studied. The "non-Hodgkin's lymphoma classification project" has been organized to study a cohort of 1,403 cases in 9 sites around the world consisting of consecutive patients seen between 1988 and 1990 in order to have a good follow-up. The reproducibility of the up-dated Kiel and the ILSG (REAL) classifications between the 5 visiting expert hematopathologists was pretty good, at least 85% for the majority of the entities. According to survival curves, the lymphomas can be stratified in 4 different groups. Comparison with the international prognostic index demonstrate that for therapeutic strategy both histopathology and index should be used. The results bring a good support to the project of the WHO to propose the first international classification of lymphomas based on both forme classifications.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Age Factors
  • Biopsy
  • Cohort Studies
  • Ethnicity
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Immunophenotyping
  • Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin / classification*
  • Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin / mortality
  • Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin / pathology*
  • Male
  • Prognosis
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sex Factors
  • Survival Analysis
  • Time Factors
  • World Health Organization