Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My Custom Filters

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Additional filters

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

Search Results

138 results

Filters applied: . Clear all
Results are displayed in a computed author sort order. The Publication Date timeline is not available.
Page 1
Clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis of an open label, single-centre, randomised trial of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) versus percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation (PMR) in patients with refractory angina pectoris: The SPiRiT trial.
Dyer MT, Goldsmith KA, Khan SN, Sharples LD, Freeman C, Hardy I, Buxton MJ, Schofield PM. Dyer MT, et al. Among authors: schofield pm. Trials. 2008 Jun 30;9:40. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-9-40. Trials. 2008. PMID: 18590536 Free PMC article.
An open label, single-centre, randomized trial of spinal cord stimulation vs. percutaneous myocardial laser revascularization in patients with refractory angina pectoris: the SPiRiT trial.
McNab D, Khan SN, Sharples LD, Ryan JY, Freeman C, Caine N, Tait S, Hardy I, Schofield PM. McNab D, et al. Among authors: schofield pm. Eur Heart J. 2006 May;27(9):1048-53. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi827. Epub 2006 Mar 22. Eur Heart J. 2006. PMID: 16554313 Clinical Trial.
Cost-effectiveness of initial stress cardiovascular MR, stress SPECT or stress echocardiography as a gate-keeper test, compared with upfront invasive coronary angiography in the investigation and management of patients with stable chest pain: mid-term outcomes from the CECaT randomised controlled trial.
Thom H, West NE, Hughes V, Dyer M, Buxton M, Sharples LD, Jackson CH, Crean AM; CECaT study group. Thom H, et al. BMJ Open. 2014 Feb 7;4(2):e003419. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003419. BMJ Open. 2014. PMID: 24508847 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
138 results