Muller KE - Search Results

1

Bias in trials comparing paired continuous tests can cause researchers to choose the wrong screening modality.

Glueck DH, Lamb MM, O'Donnell CI, Ringham BM, Brinton JT, Muller KE, Lewin JM, Alonzo TA, Pisano ED. Glueck DH, et al. Among authors: muller ke. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Jan 20;9:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-4. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009. PMID: 19154609 Free PMC article.

2

Effect of display luminance on the feature detection rates of masses in mammograms.

Hemminger BM, Dillon AW, Johnston RE, Muller KE, Deluca MC, Coffey CS, Pisano ED. Hemminger BM, et al. Among authors: muller ke. Med Phys. 1999 Nov;26(11):2266-72. doi: 10.1118/1.598740. Med Phys. 1999. PMID: 10587207

3

Radiologists' preferences for digital mammographic display. The International Digital Mammography Development Group.

Pisano ED, Cole EB, Major S, Zong S, Hemminger BM, Muller KE, Johnston RE, Walsh R, Conant E, Fajardo LL, Feig SA, Nishikawa RM, Yaffe MJ, Williams MB, Aylward SR. Pisano ED, et al. Among authors: muller ke. Radiology. 2000 Sep;216(3):820-30. doi: 10.1148/radiology.216.3.r00se48820. Radiology. 2000. PMID: 10966717

4

Interpretation of digital mammograms: comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film display.

Pisano ED, Cole EB, Kistner EO, Muller KE, Hemminger BM, Brown ML, Johnston RE, Kuzmiak CM, Braeuning MP, Freimanis RI, Soo MS, Baker JA, Walsh R. Pisano ED, et al. Among authors: muller ke. Radiology. 2002 May;223(2):483-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2232010704. Radiology. 2002. PMID: 11997557

5

Diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography in patients with dense breasts who underwent problem-solving mammography: effects of image processing and lesion type.

Cole EB, Pisano ED, Kistner EO, Muller KE, Brown ME, Feig SA, Jong RA, Maidment AD, Staiger MJ, Kuzmiak CM, Freimanis RI, Lesko N, Rosen EL, Walsh R, Williford M, Braeuning MP. Cole EB, et al. Among authors: muller ke. Radiology. 2003 Jan;226(1):153-60. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2261012024. Radiology. 2003. PMID: 12511684

6

Adjusting power for a baseline covariate in linear models.

Glueck DH, Muller KE. Glueck DH, et al. Among authors: muller ke. Stat Med. 2003 Aug 30;22(16):2535-51. doi: 10.1002/sim.1341. Stat Med. 2003. PMID: 12898543 Free PMC article.

7

The effects of gray scale image processing on digital mammography interpretation performance.

Cole EB, Pisano ED, Zeng D, Muller K, Aylward SR, Park S, Kuzmiak C, Koomen M, Pavic D, Walsh R, Baker J, Gimenez EI, Freimanis R. Cole EB, et al. Acad Radiol. 2005 May;12(5):585-95. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.01.017. Acad Radiol. 2005. PMID: 15866131

8

Comparison of calcification specificity in digital mammography using soft-copy display versus screen-film mammography.

Kim HH, Pisano ED, Cole EB, Jiroutek MR, Muller KE, Zheng Y, Kuzmiak CM, Koomen MA. Kim HH, et al. Among authors: muller ke. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Jul;187(1):47-50. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.0187. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006. PMID: 16794154

9

Exact calculations of average power for the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure.

Glueck DH, Mandel J, Karimpour-Fard A, Hunter L, Muller KE. Glueck DH, et al. Among authors: muller ke. Int J Biostat. 2008;4(1):Article 11. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1103. Int J Biostat. 2008. PMID: 21243075 Free PMC article.

10

Selecting a sample size for studies with repeated measures.

Guo Y, Logan HL, Glueck DH, Muller KE. Guo Y, et al. Among authors: muller ke. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Jul 31;13:100. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-100. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013. PMID: 23902644 Free PMC article.

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My Custom Filters

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

333 results

Search Page

Filters