van Kampen FM - Search Results

1

Mandibular implant-supported overdentures and oral function.

van der Bilt A, Burgers M, van Kampen FM, Cune MS. van der Bilt A, et al. Among authors: van kampen fm. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Nov;21(11):1209-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01915.x. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010. PMID: 20572834 Clinical Trial.

2

Masticatory function with mandibular implant-supported overdentures fitted with different attachment types.

van der Bilt A, van Kampen FM, Cune MS. van der Bilt A, et al. Among authors: van kampen fm. Eur J Oral Sci. 2006 Jun;114(3):191-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00356.x. Eur J Oral Sci. 2006. PMID: 16776767 Clinical Trial.

3

Retention and postinsertion maintenance of bar-clip, ball and magnet attachments in mandibular implant overdenture treatment: an in vivo comparison after 3 months of function.

van Kampen F, Cune M, van der Bilt A, Bosman F. van Kampen F, et al. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Dec;14(6):720-6. doi: 10.1046/j.0905-7161.2003.00961.x. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003. PMID: 15015948 Clinical Trial.

4

Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial.

Cune M, van Kampen F, van der Bilt A, Bosman F. Cune M, et al. Int J Prosthodont. 2005 Mar-Apr;18(2):99-105. Int J Prosthodont. 2005. PMID: 15889656 Clinical Trial.

5

The effect of maximum bite force on marginal bone loss in mandibular overdenture treatment: an in vivo study.

van Kampen F, Cune M, van der Bilt A, Bosman F. van Kampen F, et al. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Oct;16(5):587-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01121.x. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005. PMID: 16164466 Clinical Trial.

6

Mandibular overdentures retained by two implants: 10-year results from a crossover clinical trial comparing ball-socket and bar-clip attachments.

Cune M, Burgers M, van Kampen F, de Putter C, van der Bilt A. Cune M, et al. Int J Prosthodont. 2010 Jul-Aug;23(4):310-7. Int J Prosthodont. 2010. PMID: 20617218 Clinical Trial.

7

The influence of various attachment types in mandibular implant-retained overdentures on maximum bite force and EMG.

van Kampen FM, van der Bilt A, Cune MS, Bosman F. van Kampen FM, et al. J Dent Res. 2002 Mar;81(3):170-3. doi: 10.1177/154405910208100305. J Dent Res. 2002. PMID: 11881630 Clinical Trial.

8

Masticatory function with implant-supported overdentures.

van Kampen FM, van der Bilt A, Cune MS, Fontijn-Tekamp FA, Bosman F. van Kampen FM, et al. J Dent Res. 2004 Sep;83(9):708-11. doi: 10.1177/154405910408300910. J Dent Res. 2004. PMID: 15329377 Clinical Trial.

9

[Patient satisfaction with different types of implant-retained overdentures in the edentate mandible].

Cune MS, van Kampen FM, van der Bilt A. Cune MS, et al. Among authors: van kampen fm. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2006 Oct;113(10):401-7. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2006. PMID: 17058761 Clinical Trial. Dutch.

10

The use of the transmandibular implant system in extreme atrophy of the mandible; a retrospective study of the results in two different hospital situations.

Verhoeven JW, Cune MS, Van Kampen FM, Koole R. Verhoeven JW, et al. Among authors: van kampen fm. J Oral Rehabil. 2001 Jun;28(6):497-506. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00712.x. J Oral Rehabil. 2001. PMID: 11422674

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My Custom Filters

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

11 results

Search Page

Filters