Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My Custom Filters

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Additional filters

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

Search Results

7,633 results

Filters applied: . Clear all
Results are displayed in a computed author sort order. The Publication Date timeline is not available.
Page 1
Mammographic density adds accuracy to both the Tyrer-Cuzick and Gail breast cancer risk models in a prospective UK screening cohort.
Brentnall AR, Harkness EF, Astley SM, Donnelly LS, Stavrinos P, Sampson S, Fox L, Sergeant JC, Harvie MN, Wilson M, Beetles U, Gadde S, Lim Y, Jain A, Bundred S, Barr N, Reece V, Howell A, Cuzick J, Evans DG. Brentnall AR, et al. Among authors: lim y. Breast Cancer Res. 2015 Dec 1;17(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s13058-015-0653-5. Breast Cancer Res. 2015. PMID: 26627479 Free PMC article.
MRI breast screening in high-risk women: cancer detection and survival analysis.
Evans DG, Kesavan N, Lim Y, Gadde S, Hurley E, Massat NJ, Maxwell AJ, Ingham S, Eeles R, Leach MO; MARIBS Group; Howell A, Duffy SW. Evans DG, et al. Among authors: lim y. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Jun;145(3):663-72. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-2931-9. Epub 2014 Apr 1. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014. PMID: 24687378
The TOMMY trial: a comparison of TOMosynthesis with digital MammographY in the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme--a multicentre retrospective reading study comparing the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography with digital mammography alone.
Gilbert FJ, Tucker L, Gillan MG, Willsher P, Cooke J, Duncan KA, Michell MJ, Dobson HM, Lim YY, Purushothaman H, Strudley C, Astley SM, Morrish O, Young KC, Duffy SW. Gilbert FJ, et al. Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jan;19(4):i-xxv, 1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta19040. Health Technol Assess. 2015. PMID: 25599513 Free PMC article.
Increased peri-ductal collagen micro-organization may contribute to raised mammographic density.
McConnell JC, O'Connell OV, Brennan K, Weiping L, Howe M, Joseph L, Knight D, O'Cualain R, Lim Y, Leek A, Waddington R, Rogan J, Astley SM, Gandhi A, Kirwan CC, Sherratt MJ, Streuli CH. McConnell JC, et al. Among authors: lim y. Breast Cancer Res. 2016 Jan 8;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13058-015-0664-2. Breast Cancer Res. 2016. PMID: 26747277 Free PMC article.
False-negative MRI breast screening in high-risk women.
Maxwell AJ, Lim YY, Hurley E, Evans DG, Howell A, Gadde S. Maxwell AJ, et al. Among authors: lim yy. Clin Radiol. 2017 Mar;72(3):207-216. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.10.020. Epub 2016 Dec 5. Clin Radiol. 2017. PMID: 27932250
Does Reader Performance with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Vary according to Experience with Two-dimensional Mammography?
Tucker L, Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, Dibden A, Seth A, Morel J, Bundred S, Litherland J, Klassen H, Lip G, Purushothaman H, Dobson HM, McClure L, Skippage P, Stoner K, Kissin C, Beetles U, Lim YY, Hurley E, Goligher J, Rahim R, Gagliardi TJ, Suaris T, Duffy SW. Tucker L, et al. Radiology. 2017 May;283(2):371-380. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017151936. Epub 2017 Mar 13. Radiology. 2017. PMID: 28287917
7,633 results