Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My Custom Filters

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Additional filters

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

Search Results

348 results

Filters applied: . Clear all
Results are displayed in a computed author sort order. The Publication Date timeline is not available.
Page 1
Mammography in New Hampshire: characteristics of the women and the exams they receive.
Carney PA, Goodrich ME, O'Mahony DM, Tosteson AN, Eliassen MS, Poplack SP, Birnbaum S, Harwood BG, Burgess KA, Berube BT, Wells WS, Ball JP, Stevens MM. Carney PA, et al. Among authors: tosteson an. J Community Health. 2000 Jun;25(3):183-98. doi: 10.1023/a:1005151914471. J Community Health. 2000. PMID: 10868813
Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography breast cancer screening.
Tosteson AN, Stout NK, Fryback DG, Acharyya S, Herman BA, Hannah LG, Pisano ED; DMIST Investigators. Tosteson AN, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Jan 1;148(1):1-10. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-1-200801010-00002. Ann Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 18166758 Free PMC article.
Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST.
Pisano ED, Hendrick RE, Yaffe MJ, Baum JK, Acharyya S, Cormack JB, Hanna LA, Conant EF, Fajardo LL, Bassett LW, D'Orsi CJ, Jong RA, Rebner M, Tosteson AN, Gatsonis CA; DMIST Investigators Group. Pisano ED, et al. Among authors: tosteson an. Radiology. 2008 Feb;246(2):376-83. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2461070200. Radiology. 2008. PMID: 18227537 Free PMC article.
Breast cancer screening in an era of personalized regimens: a conceptual model and National Cancer Institute initiative for risk-based and preference-based approaches at a population level.
Onega T, Beaber EF, Sprague BL, Barlow WE, Haas JS, Tosteson AN, D Schnall M, Armstrong K, Schapira MM, Geller B, Weaver DL, Conant EF. Onega T, et al. Among authors: tosteson an. Cancer. 2014 Oct 1;120(19):2955-64. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28771. Epub 2014 May 15. Cancer. 2014. PMID: 24830599 Free PMC article. Review.
Benefits, harms, and costs for breast cancer screening after US implementation of digital mammography.
Stout NK, Lee SJ, Schechter CB, Kerlikowske K, Alagoz O, Berry D, Buist DS, Cevik M, Chisholm G, de Koning HJ, Huang H, Hubbard RA, Miglioretti DL, Munsell MF, Trentham-Dietz A, van Ravesteyn NT, Tosteson AN, Mandelblatt JS. Stout NK, et al. Among authors: tosteson an. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 May 28;106(6):dju092. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju092. Print 2014 Jun. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014. PMID: 24872543 Free PMC article.
Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts.
Sprague BL, Stout NK, Schechter C, van Ravesteyn NT, Cevik M, Alagoz O, Lee CI, van den Broek JJ, Miglioretti DL, Mandelblatt JS, de Koning HJ, Kerlikowske K, Lehman CD, Tosteson AN. Sprague BL, et al. Among authors: tosteson an. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Feb 3;162(3):157-66. doi: 10.7326/M14-0692. Ann Intern Med. 2015. PMID: 25486550 Free PMC article.
348 results