Young KC - Search Results

1

A Monte Carlo model for mean glandular dose evaluation in spot compression mammography.

Sarno A, Dance DR, van Engen RE, Young KC, Russo P, Di Lillo F, Mettivier G, Bliznakova K, Fei B, Sechopoulos I. Sarno A, et al. Among authors: young kc. Med Phys. 2017 Jul;44(7):3848-3860. doi: 10.1002/mp.12339. Epub 2017 Jun 13. Med Phys. 2017. PMID: 28500759 Free PMC article.

2

Dose and image quality in mammography with an automatic beam quality system.

Young KC, Ramsdale ML, Rust A. Young KC, et al. Br J Radiol. 1996 Jun;69(822):555-62. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-69-822-555. Br J Radiol. 1996. PMID: 8757659 Clinical Trial.

3

Effect of automatic kV selection on dose and contrast for a mammographic X-ray system.

Young KC, Ramsdale ML, Rust A, Cooke J. Young KC, et al. Br J Radiol. 1997 Oct;70(838):1036-42. doi: 10.1259/bjr.70.838.9404208. Br J Radiol. 1997. PMID: 9404208 Clinical Trial.

4

Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol.

Dance DR, Skinner CL, Young KC, Beckett JR, Kotre CJ. Dance DR, et al. Among authors: young kc. Phys Med Biol. 2000 Nov;45(11):3225-40. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/11/308. Phys Med Biol. 2000. PMID: 11098900

5

Optimal beam quality selection in digital mammography.

Young KC, Oduko JM, Bosmans H, Nijs K, Martinez L. Young KC, et al. Br J Radiol. 2006 Dec;79(948):981-90. doi: 10.1259/bjr/55334425. Br J Radiol. 2006. PMID: 17213303

6

Further factors for the estimation of mean glandular dose using the United Kingdom, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols.

Dance DR, Young KC, van Engen RE. Dance DR, et al. Among authors: young kc. Phys Med Biol. 2009 Jul 21;54(14):4361-72. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/14/002. Epub 2009 Jun 23. Phys Med Biol. 2009. PMID: 19550001

7

An alternative method for noise analysis using pixel variance as part of quality control procedures on digital mammography systems.

Bouwman R, Young K, Lazzari B, Ravaglia V, Broeders M, van Engen R. Bouwman R, et al. Phys Med Biol. 2009 Nov 21;54(22):6809-22. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/22/004. Epub 2009 Oct 21. Phys Med Biol. 2009. PMID: 19847017

8

Estimation of mean glandular dose for breast tomosynthesis: factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols.

Dance DR, Young KC, van Engen RE. Dance DR, et al. Among authors: young kc. Phys Med Biol. 2011 Jan 21;56(2):453-71. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/2/011. Epub 2010 Dec 30. Phys Med Biol. 2011. PMID: 21191150

9

Image resampling effects in mammographic image simulation.

Yip M, Mackenzie A, Lewis E, Dance DR, Young KC, Christmas W, Wells K. Yip M, et al. Among authors: young kc. Phys Med Biol. 2011 Nov 21;56(22):N275-86. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/22/N02. Epub 2011 Oct 28. Phys Med Biol. 2011. PMID: 22036846

10

The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.

Shaheen E, Van Ongeval C, Zanca F, Cockmartin L, Marshall N, Jacobs J, Young KC, R Dance D, Bosmans H. Shaheen E, et al. Among authors: young kc. Med Phys. 2011 Dec;38(12):6659-71. doi: 10.1118/1.3662868. Med Phys. 2011. PMID: 22149848

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My Custom Filters

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

330 results

Search Page

Filters