Sabah SA - Search Results

1

New instrumentation system for cementless mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty improves surgical performance particularly for trainees.

Alvand A, Wilson HA, Sabah SA, Middleton R, Bottomley N, Jackson WFM, Price AJ. Alvand A, et al. Among authors: sabah sa. Knee. 2021 Aug;31:46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2021.05.001. Epub 2021 Jun 7. Knee. 2021. PMID: 34111801

2

Manipulation Under Anesthetic After Primary Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With a Higher Rate of Subsequent Revision Surgery.

Abram SGF, Yusuf B, Alvand A, Sabah SA, Beard DJ, Price AJ. Abram SGF, et al. Among authors: sabah sa. J Arthroplasty. 2020 Sep;35(9):2640-2645.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.04.015. Epub 2020 Apr 11. J Arthroplasty. 2020. PMID: 32475786

3

Management of aseptic failure of the mobile-bearing Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Sabah SA, Lim CT, Middleton R, von Fritsch L, Bottomley N, Jackson WFM, Price AJ, Alvand A. Sabah SA, et al. Knee. 2020 Dec;27(6):1721-1728. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.10.003. Epub 2020 Nov 13. Knee. 2020. PMID: 33197810

4

Revision knee replacement for prosthetic joint infection: Epidemiology, clinical outcomes and health-economic considerations.

Sabah SA, Alvand A, Price AJ. Sabah SA, et al. Knee. 2021 Jan;28:417-421. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.12.024. Epub 2021 Jan 23. Knee. 2021. PMID: 33500184 Review.

5

Evidence for the validity of a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome after revision knee arthroplasty.

Sabah SA, Alvand A, Beard DJ, Price AJ. Sabah SA, et al. Bone Joint J. 2021 Apr;103-B(4):627-634. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B4.BJJ-2020-1560.R1. Bone Joint J. 2021. PMID: 33789485

6

Patient-Reported Function and Quality of Life After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 10,727 Patients from the NHS PROMs Program.

Sabah SA, Alvand A, Knight R, Beard DJ, Price AJ. Sabah SA, et al. J Arthroplasty. 2021 Aug;36(8):2887-2895.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.03.037. Epub 2021 Mar 19. J Arthroplasty. 2021. PMID: 33840536

7

Differences in mortality and complication rates following revision knee arthroplasty performed for urgent versus elective indications.

Abram SGF, Sabah SA, Alvand A, Price AJ. Abram SGF, et al. Among authors: sabah sa. Bone Joint J. 2021 Oct;103-B(10):1578-1585. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B10.BJJ-2020-2590.R1. Bone Joint J. 2021. PMID: 34587801

8

Patient-reported outcome measures following revision knee replacement: a review of PROM instrument utilisation and measurement properties using the COSMIN checklist.

Sabah SA, Hedge EA, Abram SGF, Alvand A, Price AJ, Hopewell S. Sabah SA, et al. BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 21;11(10):e046169. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046169. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34675009 Free PMC article. Review.

9

Minimal important changes and differences were estimated for Oxford hip and knee scores following primary and revision arthroplasty.

Sabah SA, Alvand A, Beard DJ, Price AJ. Sabah SA, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Mar;143:159-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.12.016. Epub 2021 Dec 15. J Clin Epidemiol. 2022. PMID: 34920113 Free article.

10

Implant survivorship, functional outcomes and complications with the use of rotating hinge knee implants: a systematic review.

Xu J, von Fritsch L, Sabah SA, Price AJ, Alvand A. Xu J, et al. Among authors: sabah sa. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2022 Mar 4;34(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s43019-022-00138-2. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2022. PMID: 35246278 Free PMC article.

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My Custom Filters

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

56 results

Search Page

Filters