Moshina N - Search Results

1

Comparing Screening Outcomes for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography by Automated Breast Density in a Randomized Controlled Trial: Results from the To-Be Trial.

Moshina N, Aase HS, Danielsen AS, Haldorsen IS, Lee CI, Zackrisson S, Hofvind S. Moshina N, et al. Radiology. 2022 Apr;303(1):E23. doi: 10.1148/radiol.229003. Radiology. 2022. PMID: 35312347 No abstract available.

2

Mammographic density and histopathologic characteristics of screen-detected tumors in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program.

Moshina N, Ursin G, Hoff SR, Akslen LA, Roman M, Sebuødegård S, Hofvind S. Moshina N, et al. Acta Radiol Open. 2015 Sep 17;4(9):2058460115604340. doi: 10.1177/2058460115604340. eCollection 2015 Sep. Acta Radiol Open. 2015. PMID: 26442439 Free PMC article.

3

Positive predictive values by mammographic density and screening mode in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program.

Moshina N, Ursin G, Roman M, Sebuødegård S, Hofvind S. Moshina N, et al. Eur J Radiol. 2016 Jan;85(1):248-254. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.11.030. Epub 2015 Nov 25. Eur J Radiol. 2016. PMID: 26724673

4

Compression forces used in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program.

Waade GG, Moshina N, Sebuødegård S, Hogg P, Hofvind S. Waade GG, et al. Among authors: moshina n. Br J Radiol. 2017 Mar;90(1071):20160770. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160770. Epub 2017 Feb 17. Br J Radiol. 2017. PMID: 28102696 Free PMC article.

5

Is breast compression associated with breast cancer detection and other early performance measures in a population-based breast cancer screening program?

Moshina N, Sebuødegård S, Hofvind S. Moshina N, et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jun;163(3):605-613. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4214-8. Epub 2017 Mar 29. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017. PMID: 28357655

6

Comparison of subjective and fully automated methods for measuring mammographic density.

Moshina N, Roman M, Sebuødegård S, Waade GG, Ursin G, Hofvind S. Moshina N, et al. Acta Radiol. 2018 Feb;59(2):154-160. doi: 10.1177/0284185117712540. Epub 2017 May 31. Acta Radiol. 2018. PMID: 28565960

7

Breast compression parameters and mammographic density in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Programme.

Moshina N, Roman M, Waade GG, Sebuødegård S, Ursin G, Hofvind S. Moshina N, et al. Eur Radiol. 2018 Apr;28(4):1662-1672. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5104-5. Epub 2017 Nov 2. Eur Radiol. 2018. PMID: 29098437

8

Automated Volumetric Analysis of Mammographic Density in a Screening Setting: Worse Outcomes for Women with Dense Breasts.

Moshina N, Sebuødegård S, Lee CI, Akslen LA, Tsuruda KM, Elmore JG, Hofvind S. Moshina N, et al. Radiology. 2018 Aug;288(2):343-352. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018172972. Epub 2018 Jun 26. Radiology. 2018. PMID: 29944088

9

Breast compression and experienced pain during mammography by use of three different compression paddles.

Moshina N, Sebuødegård S, Evensen KT, Hantho C, Iden KA, Hofvind S. Moshina N, et al. Eur J Radiol. 2019 Jun;115:59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 Apr 14. Eur J Radiol. 2019. PMID: 31084760

10

Comparing Screening Outcomes for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography by Automated Breast Density in a Randomized Controlled Trial: Results from the To-Be Trial.

Moshina N, Aase HS, Danielsen AS, Haldorsen IS, Lee CI, Zackrisson S, Hofvind S. Moshina N, et al. Radiology. 2020 Dec;297(3):522-531. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020201150. Epub 2020 Sep 15. Radiology. 2020. PMID: 32930649 Clinical Trial.

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My Custom Filters

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

32 results

Search Page

Filters