Engdahl SM - Search Results

1

Perspectives on the comparative benefits of body-powered and myoelectric upper limb prostheses.

Engdahl SM, Gonzalez MA, Lee C, Gates DH. Engdahl SM, et al. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 Aug 8;21(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01436-4. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024. PMID: 39118106 Free PMC article. Review.

2

Surveying the interest of individuals with upper limb loss in novel prosthetic control techniques.

Engdahl SM, Christie BP, Kelly B, Davis A, Chestek CA, Gates DH. Engdahl SM, et al. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015 Jun 13;12:53. doi: 10.1186/s12984-015-0044-2. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015. PMID: 26071402 Free PMC article.

3

Reliability of upper limb and trunk joint angles in healthy adults during activities of daily living.

Engdahl SM, Gates DH. Engdahl SM, et al. Gait Posture. 2018 Feb;60:41-47. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.11.001. Epub 2017 Nov 8. Gait Posture. 2018. PMID: 29153478 Free PMC article.

4

Reliability of upper limb movement quality metrics during everyday tasks.

Engdahl SM, Gates DH. Engdahl SM, et al. Gait Posture. 2019 Jun;71:253-260. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.04.023. Epub 2019 Apr 25. Gait Posture. 2019. PMID: 31096132

5

Differential experiences of embodiment between body-powered and myoelectric prosthesis users.

Engdahl SM, Meehan SK, Gates DH. Engdahl SM, et al. Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 22;10(1):15471. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72470-0. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 32963290 Free PMC article.

6

Differences in quality of movements made with body-powered and myoelectric prostheses during activities of daily living.

Engdahl SM, Gates DH. Engdahl SM, et al. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2021 Apr;84:105311. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105311. Epub 2021 Mar 9. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2021. PMID: 33812199

7

Recommendations for the Successful Implementation of Upper Limb Prosthetic Technology.

Gates DH, Engdahl SM, Davis A. Gates DH, et al. Among authors: engdahl sm. Hand Clin. 2021 Aug;37(3):457-466. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2021.05.007. Hand Clin. 2021. PMID: 34253318 Review.

8

A comparison of compensatory movements between body-powered and myoelectric prosthesis users during activities of daily living.

Engdahl SM, Lee C, Gates DH. Engdahl SM, et al. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2022 Jul;97:105713. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2022.105713. Epub 2022 Jun 28. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2022. PMID: 35809535

9

Factors associated with interest in novel interfaces for upper limb prosthesis control.

Engdahl SM, Chestek CA, Kelly B, Davis A, Gates DH. Engdahl SM, et al. PLoS One. 2017 Aug 2;12(8):e0182482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182482. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28767716 Free PMC article.

10

Identifying the benefits and risks of emerging integration methods for upper limb prosthetic devices in the United States: an environmental scan.

Kelley MA, Benz H, Engdahl S, Bridges JFP. Kelley MA, et al. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019 Jul;16(7):631-641. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2019.1626231. Epub 2019 Jun 17. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019. PMID: 31145868 Review.

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My Custom Filters

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

18 results

Search Page

Filters