Moore R - Search Results

1

The sternalis muscle: an unusual normal finding seen on mammography.

Bradley FM, Hoover HC Jr, Hulka CA, Whitman GJ, McCarthy KA, Hall DA, Moore R, Kopans DB. Bradley FM, et al. Among authors: moore r. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Jan;166(1):33-6. doi: 10.2214/ajr.166.1.8571900. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996. PMID: 8571900

2

Blinded comparison of computer-aided detection with human second reading in screening mammography.

Georgian-Smith D, Moore RH, Halpern E, Yeh ED, Rafferty EA, D'Alessandro HA, Staffa M, Hall DA, McCarthy KA, Kopans DB. Georgian-Smith D, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Nov;189(5):1135-41. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2393. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007. PMID: 17954651

3

Prospective comparison of mammography, sonography, and MRI in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for palpable breast cancer.

Yeh E, Slanetz P, Kopans DB, Rafferty E, Georgian-Smith D, Moy L, Halpern E, Moore R, Kuter I, Taghian A. Yeh E, et al. Among authors: moore r. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Mar;184(3):868-77. doi: 10.2214/ajr.184.3.01840868. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005. PMID: 15728611

4

Positive predictive value of breast biopsy performed as a result of mammography: there is no abrupt change at age 50 years.

Kopans DB, Moore RH, McCarthy KA, Hall DA, Hulka CA, Whitman GJ, Slanetz PJ, Halpern EF. Kopans DB, et al. Among authors: moore rh. Radiology. 1996 Aug;200(2):357-60. doi: 10.1148/radiology.200.2.8685325. Radiology. 1996. PMID: 8685325

5

Physicians' opinions on the delivery of mammographic screening services: immediate interpretation versus double reading.

Slanetz PJ, Moore RH, Hulka CA, Halpern EF, Habunek D, Whitman GJ, McCarthy KA, Hall DA, Kopans DB. Slanetz PJ, et al. Among authors: moore rh. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Aug;167(2):377-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.167.2.8686608. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996. PMID: 8686608

6

Should women with implants or a history of treatment for breast cancer be excluded from mammography screening programs?

Kopans DB, Moore RH, McCarthy KA, Hall DA, Hulka CA, Whitman GJ, Slanetz PJ, Halpern EF. Kopans DB, et al. Among authors: moore rh. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Jan;168(1):29-31. doi: 10.2214/ajr.168.1.8976914. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997. PMID: 8976914

7

Screening mammography: effect of national guidelines on current physician practice.

Slanetz PJ, Moore RH, Hulka CA, Halpern EF, Habunek DA, Whitman GJ, McCarthy KA, Hall DA, Kopans DB. Slanetz PJ, et al. Among authors: moore rh. Radiology. 1997 May;203(2):335-8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.203.2.9114084. Radiology. 1997. PMID: 9114084

8

Previous breast biopsy for benign disease rarely complicates or alters interpretation on screening mammography.

Slanetz PJ, Giardino AA, McCarthy KA, Hall DA, Halpern EF, Moore RH, Kopans DB. Slanetz PJ, et al. Among authors: moore rh. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Jun;170(6):1539-41. doi: 10.2214/ajr.170.6.9609170. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998. PMID: 9609170

9

Patients' opinion of mammography screening services: immediate results versus delayed results due to interpretation by two observers.

Hulka CA, Slanetz PJ, Halpern EF, Hall DA, McCarthy KA, Moore R, Boutin S, Kopans DB. Hulka CA, et al. Among authors: moore r. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Apr;168(4):1085-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.168.4.9124120. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997. PMID: 9124120

10

The pendent view: an additional projection to confirm the diagnosis of milk of calcium.

Moy L, Slanetz PJ, Yeh ED, Moore R, Rafferty E, McCarthy KA, Hall D, Kopans DB. Moy L, et al. Among authors: moore r. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Jul;177(1):173-5. doi: 10.2214/ajr.177.1.1770173. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001. PMID: 11418421 No abstract available.

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My Custom Filters

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

8,385 results

Search Page

Filters