Die EU-Kommission hat erstmals ein Gesetz zur Regulierung von automatisierten Entscheidungssystemen vorgelegt. "Massenüberwachung" durch KI soll damit verboten werden, biometrische Echtzeit-Überwachung soll in einigen Fällen aber erlaubt bleiben.
Künstliche Intelligenz und maschinelles Lernen bestimmen unser Leben immer mehr. Entwickler sollten sich nicht auf ihren Code zurückziehen, sagen zwei Experten.
The European Parliament's internal market committee (IMCO) insists humans must remain in control automated decision-making processes, ensuring that people are responsible and able to overrule the outcome of decisions made by computer algorithms.
Viele Entscheidungen, die unseren Alltag beeinflussen, treffen bereits Algorithmen. AlgorithmWatch will Automated Decision Making (ADM) transparent machen.
As algorithms gain ground with uses such as credit scoring and predictive policing systems, how can we make sure that automated decision-making works for the public good? Interview of Matthias Spielkamp from AlgorithmWatch by Aaron Sterniczky.
In der ZEIT vom 2. März ist unsere Antwort auf Steven Hill erschienen, der den Verzicht auf Automatisierung und andere digitale Technologien gefordert hat („You’re fired!“ Es gibt digitale Technologien, die man einfach verbieten muss.). Wir dokumentieren den Text hier in voller Länge.
Below are the new features of TOGAF 9. The bolded text is what was provided by the Open Group. The regular text is my commentary on it.
Modular structure – I am a firm believer that enterprise processes are modular pieces that should be orchestrated based on the specific set of concerns. It is good to see that TOGAF feels the same way.
Promotes greater usability & encourages incremental adoption – This is somewhat lofty and subject largely to implementation details. I do agree that the guidance provided does promote reusability. This is reinforced with the first bullet on the modular structure.
Supports evolutionary release management -
Content framework – This is a significant step in the right direction. The content framework provides architects with a map of information that is needed. From what I have seen so far there isn’t a great amount of detail here. But I am sure there is more to come.
Extended guidance on using TOGAF – The TOGAF book was expanded greatly with new guidance that extends the base concepts of TOGAF and supports new features.
Explicit consideration of architectural styles – In the guidance there are linkages between the TOGAF ADM and Service Oriented Architecture (SOA). I am hoping that this isn’t a tight coupling. If you are interested in my thoughts on architectural styles I wrote a post on this not too long ago. See the post What is an Architecture Style?
SOA and Security – This could be interesting. But only if done right. The Open Group needs to be careful at balancing out too much in the developer details (what OASIS & W3C provides) and high level / nebulous guidance (Analyst firms) that isn’t actionable. What could be of great value is if the Open Group embarked on true architectural patterns and styles that would aid SOA and EA architects on choosing the right architectural strategies.
Further detail added to the Architecture Development Method (ADM)
A number of architecture frameworks exist, each of which has its particular advantages and disadvantages, and relevance, for enterprise architecture. Several are discussed in Other Architectures and Frameworks .
However, there is no accepted industry standard method for developing an enterprise architecture. The Open Group goal with TOGAF is to work towards making the TOGAF ADM just such an industry standard method, which can be used for developing the products associated with any recognized enterprise framework that the architect feels is appropriate for a particular architecture. The Open Group vision for TOGAF is as a vehicle and repository for practical, experience-based information on how to go about the process of enterprise architecture, providing a generic method with which specific sets of deliverables, specific reference models, and other relevant architectural assets can be integrated.
To illustrate the concept, this section provides a mapping of the various phases of the TOGAF ADM to the cells of the well-known Zachman Framework.
P. Plackis-Cheng, T. Chalasani, and S. Palme. FINDHR Expert Reports, Fairness and Intersectional Non-Discrimination in Human Recommendation (FINDHR), Barcelona, (December 2023)