-
The Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility at 12 GeV
Authors:
P. A. Adderley,
S. Ahmed,
T. Allison,
R. Bachimanchi,
K. Baggett,
M. BastaniNejad,
B. Bevins,
M. Bevins,
M. Bickley,
R. M. Bodenstein,
S. A. Bogacz,
M. Bruker,
A. Burrill,
L. Cardman,
J. Creel,
Y. -C. Chao,
G. Cheng,
G. Ciovati,
S. Chattopadhyay,
J. Clark,
W. A. Clemens,
G. Croke,
E. Daly,
G. K. Davis,
J. Delayen
, et al. (114 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This review paper describes the energy-upgraded CEBAF accelerator. This superconducting linac has achieved 12 GeV beam energy by adding 11 new high-performance cryomodules containing eighty-eight superconducting cavities that have operated CW at an average accelerating gradient of 20 MV/m. After reviewing the attributes and performance of the previous 6 GeV CEBAF accelerator, we discuss the upgrad…
▽ More
This review paper describes the energy-upgraded CEBAF accelerator. This superconducting linac has achieved 12 GeV beam energy by adding 11 new high-performance cryomodules containing eighty-eight superconducting cavities that have operated CW at an average accelerating gradient of 20 MV/m. After reviewing the attributes and performance of the previous 6 GeV CEBAF accelerator, we discuss the upgraded CEBAF accelerator system in detail with particular attention paid to the new beam acceleration systems. In addition to doubling the acceleration in each linac, the upgrade included improving the beam recirculation magnets, adding more helium cooling capacity to allow the newly installed modules to run cold, adding a new experimental hall, and improving numerous other accelerator components. We review several of the techniques deployed to operate and analyze the accelerator performance, and document system operating experience and performance. In the final portion of the document, we present much of the current planning regarding projects to improve accelerator performance and enhance operating margins, and our plans for ensuring CEBAF operates reliably into the future. For the benefit of potential users of CEBAF, the performance and quality measures for beam delivered to each of the experimental halls is summarized in the appendix.
△ Less
Submitted 29 August, 2024;
originally announced August 2024.
-
Non-evaporable getter coating chambers for extreme high vacuum
Authors:
Marcy L. Stutzman,
Philip A. Adderley,
Md Abdullah A. Mamun,
Matt Poelker
Abstract:
Techniques for NEG coating a large diameter chamber are presented along with vacuum measurements in the chamber using several pumping configurations, with base pressure as low as 1.56x10^-12 Torr (N2 equivalent) with only a NEG coating and small ion pump. We then describe modifications to the NEG coating process to coat complex geometry chambers for ultra-cold atom trap experiments. Surface analys…
▽ More
Techniques for NEG coating a large diameter chamber are presented along with vacuum measurements in the chamber using several pumping configurations, with base pressure as low as 1.56x10^-12 Torr (N2 equivalent) with only a NEG coating and small ion pump. We then describe modifications to the NEG coating process to coat complex geometry chambers for ultra-cold atom trap experiments. Surface analysis of NEG coated samples are used to measure composition and morphology of the thin films. Finally, pressure measurements are compared for two NEG coated polarized electron source chambers: the 130 kV polarized electron source at Jefferson Lab and the upgraded 350 kV polarized 2 electron source, both of which are approaching or within the extreme high vacuum (XHV) range, defined as P<7.5x10^-13 Torr.
△ Less
Submitted 22 March, 2018; v1 submitted 19 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
-
The effect of heat treatments and coatings on the outgassing rate of stainless steel chambers
Authors:
M. A. Mamun,
A. A. Elmustafa,
M. L. Stutzman,
P. A. Adderley,
M. Poelker
Abstract:
The outgassing rates of three nominally identical 304L stainless steel vacuum chambers were measured to determine the effect of chamber coatings and heat treatments. One chamber was coated with titanium nitride (TiN) and one with amorphous silicon (a-Si) immediately following fabrication. The last chamber was first tested without any coating, and then coated with a-Si following a series of heat tr…
▽ More
The outgassing rates of three nominally identical 304L stainless steel vacuum chambers were measured to determine the effect of chamber coatings and heat treatments. One chamber was coated with titanium nitride (TiN) and one with amorphous silicon (a-Si) immediately following fabrication. The last chamber was first tested without any coating, and then coated with a-Si following a series of heat treatments. The outgassing rate of each chamber was measured at room temperatures between 15 and 30 °C following bakes at temperatures between 90 and 400 °C. Measurements for bare steel showed a significant reduction in the outgassing rate by nearly a factor of 20 after a 400 °C heat treatment (3.5x10-12 Torr L s-1 cm-2 prior to heat treatment, reduced to 1.7x10-13 Torr L s-1 cm-2 following heat treatment). The chambers that were coated with a-Si showed minimal change in outgassing rates with heat treatment, though an outgassing rate reduced by heat treatments prior to a-Si coating was successfully preserved throughout a series of bakes. The TiN coated chamber exhibited remarkably low outgassing rates, up to four orders of magnitude lower than the uncoated stainless steel, but the uncertainty in these rates is large due to the sensitivity limitations of the spinning rotor gauge accumulation measurement and the possibility of a small pump speed due to inhomogeneity in the TiN coating. The outgassing results are discussed in terms of diffusion-limited versus recombination-limited processes.
△ Less
Submitted 27 January, 2014; v1 submitted 16 July, 2013;
originally announced July 2013.
