-
Grace periods in comparative effectiveness studies of sustained treatments
Authors:
Kerollos Nashat Wanis,
Aaron L. Sarvet,
Lan Wen,
Jason P. Block,
Sheryl L. Rifas-Shiman,
James M. Robins,
Jessica G. Young
Abstract:
Researchers are often interested in estimating the effect of sustained use of a treatment on a health outcome. However, adherence to strict treatment protocols can be challenging for individuals in practice and, when non-adherence is expected, estimates of the effect of sustained use may not be useful for decision making. As an alternative, more relaxed treatment protocols which allow for periods…
▽ More
Researchers are often interested in estimating the effect of sustained use of a treatment on a health outcome. However, adherence to strict treatment protocols can be challenging for individuals in practice and, when non-adherence is expected, estimates of the effect of sustained use may not be useful for decision making. As an alternative, more relaxed treatment protocols which allow for periods of time off treatment (i.e. grace periods) have been considered in pragmatic randomized trials and observational studies. In this article, we consider the interpretation, identification, and estimation of treatment strategies which include grace periods. We contrast natural grace period strategies which allow individuals the flexibility to take treatment as they would naturally do, with stochastic grace period strategies in which the investigator specifies the distribution of treatment utilization. We estimate the effect of initiation of a thiazide diuretic or an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor in hypertensive individuals under various strategies which include grace periods.
△ Less
Submitted 23 January, 2024; v1 submitted 21 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
Modeling partitions of individuals
Authors:
Marion Hoffman,
Per Block,
Tom A. B. Snijders
Abstract:
Despite the central role of self-assembled groups in animal and human societies, statistical tools to explain their composition are limited. We introduce a statistical framework for cross-sectional observations of groups with exclusive membership to illuminate the social and organizational mechanisms that bring people together. Drawing from stochastic models for networks and partitions, the propos…
▽ More
Despite the central role of self-assembled groups in animal and human societies, statistical tools to explain their composition are limited. We introduce a statistical framework for cross-sectional observations of groups with exclusive membership to illuminate the social and organizational mechanisms that bring people together. Drawing from stochastic models for networks and partitions, the proposed framework introduces an exponential family of distributions for partitions. We derive its main mathematical properties and suggest strategies to specify and estimate such models. A case study on hackathon events applies the developed framework to the study of mechanisms underlying the formation of self-assembled project teams.
△ Less
Submitted 2 August, 2021; v1 submitted 29 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
-
Social network-based distancing strategies to flatten the COVID 19 curve in a post-lockdown world
Authors:
Per Block,
Marion Hoffman,
Isabel J. Raabe,
Jennifer Beam Dowd,
Charles Rahal,
Ridhi Kashyap,
Melinda C. Mills
Abstract:
Social distancing and isolation have been introduced widely to counter the COVID-19 pandemic. However, more moderate contact reduction policies become desirable owing to adverse social, psychological, and economic consequences of a complete or near-complete lockdown. Adopting a social network approach, we evaluate the effectiveness of three targeted distancing strategies designed to 'keep the curv…
▽ More
Social distancing and isolation have been introduced widely to counter the COVID-19 pandemic. However, more moderate contact reduction policies become desirable owing to adverse social, psychological, and economic consequences of a complete or near-complete lockdown. Adopting a social network approach, we evaluate the effectiveness of three targeted distancing strategies designed to 'keep the curve flat' and aid compliance in a post-lockdown world. These are limiting interaction to a few repeated contacts, seeking similarity across contacts, and strengthening communities via triadic strategies. We simulate stochastic infection curves that incorporate core elements from infection models, ideal-type social network models, and statistical relational event models. We demonstrate that strategic reduction of contact can strongly increase the efficiency of social distancing measures, introducing the possibility of allowing some social contact while keeping risks low. This approach provides nuanced insights to policy makers for effective social distancing that can mitigate negative consequences of social isolation.
△ Less
Submitted 27 May, 2020; v1 submitted 15 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
-
"Predicting" after peeking into the future: Correcting a fundamental flaw in the SAOM -- TERGM comparison of Leifeld and Cranmer (2019)
Authors:
Per Block,
James Hollway,
Christoph Stadtfeld,
Johan Koskinen,
Tom Snijders
Abstract:
We review the empirical comparison of SAOMs and TERGMs by Leifeld and Cranmer (2019) in Network Science. We note that their model specification uses nodal covariates calculated from observed degrees instead of using structural effects, thus turning endogeneity into circularity. In consequence, their out-of-sample predictions using TERGMs are based on out-of-sample information and thereby predict t…
▽ More
We review the empirical comparison of SAOMs and TERGMs by Leifeld and Cranmer (2019) in Network Science. We note that their model specification uses nodal covariates calculated from observed degrees instead of using structural effects, thus turning endogeneity into circularity. In consequence, their out-of-sample predictions using TERGMs are based on out-of-sample information and thereby predict the future using observations from the future. We conclude that their analysis rest on erroneous model specifications that render the article's conclusions meaningless. Consequently, researchers should disregard recommendations from the criticized paper when making informed modelling choices.
△ Less
Submitted 4 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
