Resonance strengths for KLL dielectronic recombination of highly charged mercury ions and improved empirical $\boldsymbol{Z}$-scaling law
Authors:
Zoltán Harman,
Chintan Shah,
Antonio J. González-Martínez,
Ulrich D. Jentschura,
Hiro Tawara,
Christoph H. Keitel,
Joachim Ullrich,
José R. Crespo López-Urrutia
Abstract:
Theoretical and experimental resonance strengths for KLL dielectronic recombination (DR) into He-, Li-, Be-, and B-like mercury ions are presented, based on state-resolved DR x-ray spectra recorded at the Heidelberg electron beam ion trap. The DR resonance strengths were experimentally extracted by normalizing them to simultaneously recorded radiative recombination signals. The results are compare…
▽ More
Theoretical and experimental resonance strengths for KLL dielectronic recombination (DR) into He-, Li-, Be-, and B-like mercury ions are presented, based on state-resolved DR x-ray spectra recorded at the Heidelberg electron beam ion trap. The DR resonance strengths were experimentally extracted by normalizing them to simultaneously recorded radiative recombination signals. The results are compared to state-of-the-art atomic calculations that include relativistic electron-electron correlation and configuration mixing effects. Combining the present data with other existing ones, we derive an improved semi-empirical $Z$-scaling law for DR resonance strength as a function of the atomic number, taking into account higher-order relativistic corrections, which are especially relevant for heavy highly charged ions.
△ Less
Submitted 12 December, 2018; v1 submitted 9 July, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.
Winning versus losing during gambling and its neural correlates
Authors:
Pierre Sacré,
Matthew S. D. Kerr,
Sandya Subramanian,
Kevin Kahn,
Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez,
Matthew A. Johnson,
John T. Gale,
Sridevi V. Sarma
Abstract:
Humans often make decisions which maximize an internal utility function. For example, humans often maximize their expected reward when gambling and this is considered as a "rational" decision. However, humans tend to change their betting strategies depending on how they "feel". If someone has experienced a losing streak, they may "feel" that they are more likely to win on the next hand even though…
▽ More
Humans often make decisions which maximize an internal utility function. For example, humans often maximize their expected reward when gambling and this is considered as a "rational" decision. However, humans tend to change their betting strategies depending on how they "feel". If someone has experienced a losing streak, they may "feel" that they are more likely to win on the next hand even though the odds of the game have not changed. That is, their decisions are driven by their emotional state. In this paper, we investigate how the human brain responds to wins and losses during gambling. Using a combination of local field potential recordings in human subjects performing a financial decision-making task, spectral analyses, and non-parametric cluster statistics, we investigated whether neural responses in different cognitive and limbic brain areas differ between wins and losses after decisions are made. In eleven subjects, the neural activity modulated significantly between win and loss trials in one brain region: the anterior insula ($p=0.01$). In particular, gamma activity (30-70 Hz) increased in the anterior insula when subjects just realized that they won. Modulation of metabolic activity in the anterior insula has been observed previously in functional magnetic resonance imaging studies during decision making and when emotions are elicited. However, our study is able to characterize temporal dynamics of electrical activity in this brain region at the millisecond resolution while decisions are made and after outcomes are revealed.
△ Less
Submitted 10 February, 2016;
originally announced February 2016.
