Predicting Opioid Use Outcomes in Minoritized Communities
Authors:
Abhay Goyal,
Nimay Parekh,
Lam Yin Cheung,
Koustuv Saha,
Frederick L Altice,
Robin O'hanlon,
Roger Ho Chun Man,
Christian Poellabauer,
Honoria Guarino,
Pedro Mateu Gelabert,
Navin Kumar
Abstract:
Machine learning algorithms can sometimes exacerbate health disparities based on ethnicity, gender, and other factors. There has been limited work at exploring potential biases within algorithms deployed on a small scale, and/or within minoritized communities. Understanding the nature of potential biases may improve the prediction of various health outcomes. As a case study, we used data from a sa…
▽ More
Machine learning algorithms can sometimes exacerbate health disparities based on ethnicity, gender, and other factors. There has been limited work at exploring potential biases within algorithms deployed on a small scale, and/or within minoritized communities. Understanding the nature of potential biases may improve the prediction of various health outcomes. As a case study, we used data from a sample of 539 young adults from minoritized communities who engaged in nonmedical use of prescription opioids and/or heroin. We addressed the indicated issues through the following contributions: 1) Using machine learning techniques, we predicted a range of opioid use outcomes for participants in our dataset; 2) We assessed if algorithms trained only on a majority sub-sample (e.g., Non-Hispanic/Latino, male), could accurately predict opioid use outcomes for a minoritized sub-sample (e.g., Latino, female). Results indicated that models trained on a random sample of our data could predict a range of opioid use outcomes with high precision. However, we noted a decrease in precision when we trained our models on data from a majority sub-sample, and tested these models on a minoritized sub-sample. We posit that a range of cultural factors and systemic forms of discrimination are not captured by data from majority sub-samples. Broadly, for predictions to be valid, models should be trained on data that includes adequate representation of the groups of people about whom predictions will be made. Stakeholders may utilize our findings to mitigate biases in models for predicting opioid use outcomes within minoritized communities.
△ Less
Submitted 6 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
Clustering Network Tree Data From Respondent-driven sampling with application to opioid users in New York City
Authors:
Shuaimin Kang,
Krista Gile,
Pedro Mateu-Gelabert,
Honoria Guarino
Abstract:
There is great interest in finding meaningful subgroups of attributed network data. There are many available methods for clustering complete network. Unfortunately, much network data is collected through sampling, and therefore incomplete. Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a widely used method for sampling hard-to-reach human populations based on tracing links in the underlying unobserved social…
▽ More
There is great interest in finding meaningful subgroups of attributed network data. There are many available methods for clustering complete network. Unfortunately, much network data is collected through sampling, and therefore incomplete. Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a widely used method for sampling hard-to-reach human populations based on tracing links in the underlying unobserved social network. The resulting data therefore have tree structure representing a sub-sample of the network, along with many nodal attributes. In this paper, we introduce an approach to adjust mixture models for general network clustering for samplings by RDS. We apply our model to data on opioid users in New York City, and detect communities reflecting group characteristics of interest for intervention activities, including drug use patterns, social connections and other community variables
△ Less
Submitted 8 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
