-
Disentangling spatio-temporal knowledge for weakly supervised object detection and segmentation in surgical video
Authors:
Guiqiu Liao,
Matjaz Jogan,
Sai Koushik,
Eric Eaton,
Daniel A. Hashimoto
Abstract:
Weakly supervised video object segmentation (WSVOS) enables the identification of segmentation maps without requiring an extensive training dataset of object masks, relying instead on coarse video labels indicating object presence. Current state-of-the-art methods either require multiple independent stages of processing that employ motion cues or, in the case of end-to-end trainable networks, lack…
▽ More
Weakly supervised video object segmentation (WSVOS) enables the identification of segmentation maps without requiring an extensive training dataset of object masks, relying instead on coarse video labels indicating object presence. Current state-of-the-art methods either require multiple independent stages of processing that employ motion cues or, in the case of end-to-end trainable networks, lack in segmentation accuracy, in part due to the difficulty of learning segmentation maps from videos with transient object presence. This limits the application of WSVOS for semantic annotation of surgical videos where multiple surgical tools frequently move in and out of the field of view, a problem that is more difficult than typically encountered in WSVOS. This paper introduces Video Spatio-Temporal Disentanglement Networks (VDST-Net), a framework to disentangle spatiotemporal information using semi-decoupled knowledge distillation to predict high-quality class activation maps (CAMs). A teacher network designed to resolve temporal conflicts when specifics about object location and timing in the video are not provided works with a student network that integrates information over time by leveraging temporal dependencies. We demonstrate the efficacy of our framework on a public reference dataset and on a more challenging surgical video dataset where objects are, on average, present in less than 60\% of annotated frames. Our method outperforms state-of-the-art techniques and generates superior segmentation masks under video-level weak supervision.
△ Less
Submitted 23 July, 2024; v1 submitted 22 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
-
The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making
Authors:
Valerio Capraro,
Austin Lentsch,
Daron Acemoglu,
Selin Akgun,
Aisel Akhmedova,
Ennio Bilancini,
Jean-François Bonnefon,
Pablo Brañas-Garza,
Luigi Butera,
Karen M. Douglas,
Jim A. C. Everett,
Gerd Gigerenzer,
Christine Greenhow,
Daniel A. Hashimoto,
Julianne Holt-Lunstad,
Jolanda Jetten,
Simon Johnson,
Chiara Longoni,
Pete Lunn,
Simone Natale,
Iyad Rahwan,
Neil Selwyn,
Vivek Singh,
Siddharth Suri,
Jennifer Sutcliffe
, et al. (6 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Generative artificial intelligence has the potential to both exacerbate and ameliorate existing socioeconomic inequalities. In this article, we provide a state-of-the-art interdisciplinary overview of the potential impacts of generative AI on (mis)information and three information-intensive domains: work, education, and healthcare. Our goal is to highlight how generative AI could worsen existing i…
▽ More
Generative artificial intelligence has the potential to both exacerbate and ameliorate existing socioeconomic inequalities. In this article, we provide a state-of-the-art interdisciplinary overview of the potential impacts of generative AI on (mis)information and three information-intensive domains: work, education, and healthcare. Our goal is to highlight how generative AI could worsen existing inequalities while illuminating how AI may help mitigate pervasive social problems. In the information domain, generative AI can democratize content creation and access, but may dramatically expand the production and proliferation of misinformation. In the workplace, it can boost productivity and create new jobs, but the benefits will likely be distributed unevenly. In education, it offers personalized learning, but may widen the digital divide. In healthcare, it might improve diagnostics and accessibility, but could deepen pre-existing inequalities. In each section we cover a specific topic, evaluate existing research, identify critical gaps, and recommend research directions, including explicit trade-offs that complicate the derivation of a priori hypotheses. We conclude with a section highlighting the role of policymaking to maximize generative AI's potential to reduce inequalities while mitigating its harmful effects. We discuss strengths and weaknesses of existing policy frameworks in the European Union, the United States, and the United Kingdom, observing that each fails to fully confront the socioeconomic challenges we have identified. We propose several concrete policies that could promote shared prosperity through the advancement of generative AI. This article emphasizes the need for interdisciplinary collaborations to understand and address the complex challenges of generative AI.
△ Less
Submitted 6 May, 2024; v1 submitted 16 December, 2023;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Understanding metric-related pitfalls in image analysis validation
Authors:
Annika Reinke,
Minu D. Tizabi,
Michael Baumgartner,
Matthias Eisenmann,
Doreen Heckmann-Nötzel,
A. Emre Kavur,
Tim Rädsch,
Carole H. Sudre,
Laura Acion,
Michela Antonelli,
Tal Arbel,
Spyridon Bakas,
Arriel Benis,
Matthew Blaschko,
Florian Buettner,
M. Jorge Cardoso,
Veronika Cheplygina,
Jianxu Chen,
Evangelia Christodoulou,
Beth A. Cimini,
Gary S. Collins,
Keyvan Farahani,
Luciana Ferrer,
Adrian Galdran,
Bram van Ginneken
, et al. (53 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Validation metrics are key for the reliable tracking of scientific progress and for bridging the current chasm between artificial intelligence (AI) research and its translation into practice. However, increasing evidence shows that particularly in image analysis, metrics are often chosen inadequately in relation to the underlying research problem. This could be attributed to a lack of accessibilit…
▽ More
Validation metrics are key for the reliable tracking of scientific progress and for bridging the current chasm between artificial intelligence (AI) research and its translation into practice. However, increasing evidence shows that particularly in image analysis, metrics are often chosen inadequately in relation to the underlying research problem. This could be attributed to a lack of accessibility of metric-related knowledge: While taking into account the individual strengths, weaknesses, and limitations of validation metrics is a critical prerequisite to making educated choices, the relevant knowledge is currently scattered and poorly accessible to individual researchers. Based on a multi-stage Delphi process conducted by a multidisciplinary expert consortium as well as extensive community feedback, the present work provides the first reliable and comprehensive common point of access to information on pitfalls related to validation metrics in image analysis. Focusing on biomedical image analysis but with the potential of transfer to other fields, the addressed pitfalls generalize across application domains and are categorized according to a newly created, domain-agnostic taxonomy. To facilitate comprehension, illustrations and specific examples accompany each pitfall. As a structured body of information accessible to researchers of all levels of expertise, this work enhances global comprehension of a key topic in image analysis validation.
△ Less
Submitted 23 February, 2024; v1 submitted 3 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
Metrics reloaded: Recommendations for image analysis validation
Authors:
Lena Maier-Hein,
Annika Reinke,
Patrick Godau,
Minu D. Tizabi,
Florian Buettner,
Evangelia Christodoulou,
Ben Glocker,
Fabian Isensee,
Jens Kleesiek,
Michal Kozubek,
Mauricio Reyes,
Michael A. Riegler,
Manuel Wiesenfarth,
A. Emre Kavur,
Carole H. Sudre,
Michael Baumgartner,
Matthias Eisenmann,
Doreen Heckmann-Nötzel,
Tim Rädsch,
Laura Acion,
Michela Antonelli,
Tal Arbel,
Spyridon Bakas,
Arriel Benis,
Matthew Blaschko
, et al. (49 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Increasing evidence shows that flaws in machine learning (ML) algorithm validation are an underestimated global problem. Particularly in automatic biomedical image analysis, chosen performance metrics often do not reflect the domain interest, thus failing to adequately measure scientific progress and hindering translation of ML techniques into practice. To overcome this, our large international ex…
▽ More
Increasing evidence shows that flaws in machine learning (ML) algorithm validation are an underestimated global problem. Particularly in automatic biomedical image analysis, chosen performance metrics often do not reflect the domain interest, thus failing to adequately measure scientific progress and hindering translation of ML techniques into practice. To overcome this, our large international expert consortium created Metrics Reloaded, a comprehensive framework guiding researchers in the problem-aware selection of metrics. Following the convergence of ML methodology across application domains, Metrics Reloaded fosters the convergence of validation methodology. The framework was developed in a multi-stage Delphi process and is based on the novel concept of a problem fingerprint - a structured representation of the given problem that captures all aspects that are relevant for metric selection, from the domain interest to the properties of the target structure(s), data set and algorithm output. Based on the problem fingerprint, users are guided through the process of choosing and applying appropriate validation metrics while being made aware of potential pitfalls. Metrics Reloaded targets image analysis problems that can be interpreted as a classification task at image, object or pixel level, namely image-level classification, object detection, semantic segmentation, and instance segmentation tasks. To improve the user experience, we implemented the framework in the Metrics Reloaded online tool, which also provides a point of access to explore weaknesses, strengths and specific recommendations for the most common validation metrics. The broad applicability of our framework across domains is demonstrated by an instantiation for various biological and medical image analysis use cases.
△ Less
Submitted 23 February, 2024; v1 submitted 3 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
Concept Graph Neural Networks for Surgical Video Understanding
Authors:
Yutong Ban,
Jennifer A. Eckhoff,
Thomas M. Ward,
Daniel A. Hashimoto,
Ozanan R. Meireles,
Daniela Rus,
Guy Rosman
Abstract:
We constantly integrate our knowledge and understanding of the world to enhance our interpretation of what we see.
This ability is crucial in application domains which entail reasoning about multiple entities and concepts, such as AI-augmented surgery. In this paper, we propose a novel way of integrating conceptual knowledge into temporal analysis tasks via temporal concept graph networks. In th…
▽ More
We constantly integrate our knowledge and understanding of the world to enhance our interpretation of what we see.
This ability is crucial in application domains which entail reasoning about multiple entities and concepts, such as AI-augmented surgery. In this paper, we propose a novel way of integrating conceptual knowledge into temporal analysis tasks via temporal concept graph networks. In the proposed networks, a global knowledge graph is incorporated into the temporal analysis of surgical instances, learning the meaning of concepts and relations as they apply to the data. We demonstrate our results in surgical video data for tasks such as verification of critical view of safety, as well as estimation of Parkland grading scale. The results show that our method improves the recognition and detection of complex benchmarks as well as enables other analytic applications of interest.
△ Less
Submitted 25 April, 2023; v1 submitted 27 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
SUPR-GAN: SUrgical PRediction GAN for Event Anticipation in Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery
Authors:
Yutong Ban,
Guy Rosman,
Jennifer A. Eckhoff,
Thomas M. Ward,
Daniel A. Hashimoto,
Taisei Kondo,
Hidekazu Iwaki,
Ozanan R. Meireles,
Daniela Rus
Abstract:
Comprehension of surgical workflow is the foundation upon which artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) holds the potential to assist intraoperative decision-making and risk mitigation. In this work, we move beyond mere identification of past surgical phases, into the prediction of future surgical steps and specification of the transitions between them. We use a novel Generative Adv…
▽ More
Comprehension of surgical workflow is the foundation upon which artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) holds the potential to assist intraoperative decision-making and risk mitigation. In this work, we move beyond mere identification of past surgical phases, into the prediction of future surgical steps and specification of the transitions between them. We use a novel Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) formulation to sample future surgical phases trajectories conditioned on past video frames from laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) videos and compare it to state-of-the-art approaches for surgical video analysis and alternative prediction methods. We demonstrate the GAN formulation's effectiveness through inferring and predicting the progress of LC videos. We quantify the horizon-accuracy trade-off and explored average performance, as well as the performance on the more challenging, and clinically relevant transitions between phases. Furthermore, we conduct a survey, asking 16 surgeons of different specialties and educational levels to qualitatively evaluate predicted surgery phases.
△ Less
Submitted 9 March, 2022; v1 submitted 10 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Common Limitations of Image Processing Metrics: A Picture Story
Authors:
Annika Reinke,
Minu D. Tizabi,
Carole H. Sudre,
Matthias Eisenmann,
Tim Rädsch,
Michael Baumgartner,
Laura Acion,
Michela Antonelli,
Tal Arbel,
Spyridon Bakas,
Peter Bankhead,
Arriel Benis,
Matthew Blaschko,
Florian Buettner,
M. Jorge Cardoso,
Jianxu Chen,
Veronika Cheplygina,
Evangelia Christodoulou,
Beth Cimini,
Gary S. Collins,
Sandy Engelhardt,
Keyvan Farahani,
Luciana Ferrer,
Adrian Galdran,
Bram van Ginneken
, et al. (68 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
While the importance of automatic image analysis is continuously increasing, recent meta-research revealed major flaws with respect to algorithm validation. Performance metrics are particularly key for meaningful, objective, and transparent performance assessment and validation of the used automatic algorithms, but relatively little attention has been given to the practical pitfalls when using spe…
▽ More
While the importance of automatic image analysis is continuously increasing, recent meta-research revealed major flaws with respect to algorithm validation. Performance metrics are particularly key for meaningful, objective, and transparent performance assessment and validation of the used automatic algorithms, but relatively little attention has been given to the practical pitfalls when using specific metrics for a given image analysis task. These are typically related to (1) the disregard of inherent metric properties, such as the behaviour in the presence of class imbalance or small target structures, (2) the disregard of inherent data set properties, such as the non-independence of the test cases, and (3) the disregard of the actual biomedical domain interest that the metrics should reflect. This living dynamically document has the purpose to illustrate important limitations of performance metrics commonly applied in the field of image analysis. In this context, it focuses on biomedical image analysis problems that can be phrased as image-level classification, semantic segmentation, instance segmentation, or object detection task. The current version is based on a Delphi process on metrics conducted by an international consortium of image analysis experts from more than 60 institutions worldwide.
△ Less
Submitted 6 December, 2023; v1 submitted 12 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Surgical Data Science -- from Concepts toward Clinical Translation
Authors:
Lena Maier-Hein,
Matthias Eisenmann,
Duygu Sarikaya,
Keno März,
Toby Collins,
Anand Malpani,
Johannes Fallert,
Hubertus Feussner,
Stamatia Giannarou,
Pietro Mascagni,
Hirenkumar Nakawala,
Adrian Park,
Carla Pugh,
Danail Stoyanov,
Swaroop S. Vedula,
Kevin Cleary,
Gabor Fichtinger,
Germain Forestier,
Bernard Gibaud,
Teodor Grantcharov,
Makoto Hashizume,
Doreen Heckmann-Nötzel,
Hannes G. Kenngott,
Ron Kikinis,
Lars Mündermann
, et al. (25 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Recent developments in data science in general and machine learning in particular have transformed the way experts envision the future of surgery. Surgical Data Science (SDS) is a new research field that aims to improve the quality of interventional healthcare through the capture, organization, analysis and modeling of data. While an increasing number of data-driven approaches and clinical applica…
▽ More
Recent developments in data science in general and machine learning in particular have transformed the way experts envision the future of surgery. Surgical Data Science (SDS) is a new research field that aims to improve the quality of interventional healthcare through the capture, organization, analysis and modeling of data. While an increasing number of data-driven approaches and clinical applications have been studied in the fields of radiological and clinical data science, translational success stories are still lacking in surgery. In this publication, we shed light on the underlying reasons and provide a roadmap for future advances in the field. Based on an international workshop involving leading researchers in the field of SDS, we review current practice, key achievements and initiatives as well as available standards and tools for a number of topics relevant to the field, namely (1) infrastructure for data acquisition, storage and access in the presence of regulatory constraints, (2) data annotation and sharing and (3) data analytics. We further complement this technical perspective with (4) a review of currently available SDS products and the translational progress from academia and (5) a roadmap for faster clinical translation and exploitation of the full potential of SDS, based on an international multi-round Delphi process.
△ Less
Submitted 30 July, 2021; v1 submitted 30 October, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.