Showing 1–19 of 19 results for author: Onions, J

Cosmic CARNage II: the evolution of the galaxy stellar mass function in observations and galaxy formation models

Authors: Rachel Asquith, Frazer R. Pearce, Omar Almaini, Alexander Knebe, Violeta Gonzalez-Perez, Andrew Benson, Jeremy Blaizot, Jorge Carretero, Francisco J. Castander, Andrea Cattaneo, Sofía A. Cora, Darren J. Croton, Julien E. Devriendt, Fabio Fontanot, Ignacio D. Gargiulo, Will Hartley, Bruno Henriques, Jaehyun Lee, Gary A. Mamon, Julian Onions, Nelson D. Padilla, Chris Power, Chaichalit Srisawat, Adam R. H. Stevens, Peter A. Thomas , et al. (2 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: We present a comparison of the observed evolving galaxy stellar mass functions with the predictions of eight semi-analytic models and one halo occupation distribution model. While most models are able to fit the data at low redshift, some of them struggle to simultaneously fit observations at high redshift. We separate the galaxies into 'passive' and 'star-forming' classes and find that several of… ▽ More We present a comparison of the observed evolving galaxy stellar mass functions with the predictions of eight semi-analytic models and one halo occupation distribution model. While most models are able to fit the data at low redshift, some of them struggle to simultaneously fit observations at high redshift. We separate the galaxies into 'passive' and 'star-forming' classes and find that several of the models produce too many low-mass star-forming galaxies at high redshift compared to observations, in some cases by nearly a factor of 10 in the redshift range $2.5 < z < 3.0$. We also find important differences in the implied mass of the dark matter haloes the galaxies inhabit, by comparing with halo masses inferred from observations. Galaxies at high redshift in the models are in lower mass haloes than suggested by observations, and the star formation efficiency in low-mass haloes is higher than observed. We conclude that many of the models require a physical prescription that acts to dissociate the growth of low-mass galaxies from the growth of their dark matter haloes at high redshift. △ Less

Submitted 27 July, 2018; v1 submitted 10 July, 2018; originally announced July 2018.

Comments: 16 pages, 8 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS

Cosmic CARNage I: on the calibration of galaxy formation models

Authors: Alexander Knebe, Frazer R. Pearce, Violeta Gonzalez-Perez, Peter A. Thomas, Andrew Benson, Rachel Asquith, Jeremy Blaizot, Richard Bower, Jorge Carretero, Francisco J. Castander, Andrea Cattaneo, Sofia A. Cora, Darren J. Croton, Weiguang Cui, Daniel Cunnama, Julien E. Devriendt, Pascal J. Elahi, Andreea Font, Fabio Fontanot, Ignacio D. Gargiulo, John Helly, Bruno Henriques, Jaehyun Lee, Gary A. Mamon, Julian Onions , et al. (9 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: We present a comparison of nine galaxy formation models, eight semi-analytical and one halo occupation distribution model, run on the same underlying cold dark matter simulation (cosmological box of co-moving width 125$h^{-1}$ Mpc, with a dark-matter particle mass of $1.24\times 10^9 h^{-1}$ Msun) and the same merger trees. While their free parameters have been calibrated to the same observational… ▽ More We present a comparison of nine galaxy formation models, eight semi-analytical and one halo occupation distribution model, run on the same underlying cold dark matter simulation (cosmological box of co-moving width 125$h^{-1}$ Mpc, with a dark-matter particle mass of $1.24\times 10^9 h^{-1}$ Msun) and the same merger trees. While their free parameters have been calibrated to the same observational data sets using two approaches, they nevertheless retain some 'memory' of any previous calibration that served as the starting point (especially for the manually-tuned models). For the first calibration, models reproduce the observed z = 0 galaxy stellar mass function (SMF) within 3-σ. The second calibration extended the observational data to include the z = 2 SMF alongside the z~0 star formation rate function, cold gas mass and the black hole-bulge mass relation. Encapsulating the observed evolution of the SMF from z = 2 to z = 0 is found to be very hard within the context of the physics currently included in the models. We finally use our calibrated models to study the evolution of the stellar-to-halo mass (SHM) ratio. For all models we find that the peak value of the SHM relation decreases with redshift. However, the trends seen for the evolution of the peak position as well as the mean scatter in the SHM relation are rather weak and strongly model dependent. Both the calibration data sets and model results are publicly available. △ Less

Submitted 18 December, 2017; originally announced December 2017.

Comments: 20 pages, 14 figures (+5 supplementary figures in the Appendix), accepted for publication in MNRAS

nIFTy Cosmology: the clustering consistency of galaxy formation models

Authors: Arnau Pujol, Ramin A. Skibba, Enrique Gaztañaga, Andrew Benson, Jeremy Blaizot, Richard Bower, Jorge Carretero, Francisco J. Castander, Andrea Cattaneo, Sofia A. Cora, Darren J. Croton, Weiguang Cui, Daniel Cunnama, Gabriella De Lucia, Julien E. Devriendt, Pascal J. Elahi, Andreea Font, Fabio Fontanot, Juan Garcia-Bellido, Ignacio D. Gargiulo, Violeta Gonzalez-Perez, John Helly, Bruno M. B. Henriques, Michaela Hirschmann, Alexander Knebe , et al. (13 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: We present a clustering comparison of 12 galaxy formation models (including Semi-Analytic Models (SAMs) and Halo Occupation Distribution (HOD) models) all run on halo catalogues and merger trees extracted from a single ΛCDM N-body simulation. We compare the results of the measurements of the mean halo occupation numbers, the radial distribution of galaxies in haloes and the 2-Point Correlation Fun… ▽ More We present a clustering comparison of 12 galaxy formation models (including Semi-Analytic Models (SAMs) and Halo Occupation Distribution (HOD) models) all run on halo catalogues and merger trees extracted from a single ΛCDM N-body simulation. We compare the results of the measurements of the mean halo occupation numbers, the radial distribution of galaxies in haloes and the 2-Point Correlation Functions (2PCF). We also study the implications of the different treatments of orphan (galaxies not assigned to any dark matter subhalo) and non-orphan galaxies in these measurements. Our main result is that the galaxy formation models generally agree in their clustering predictions but they disagree significantly between HOD and SAMs for the orphan satellites. Although there is a very good agreement between the models on the 2PCF of central galaxies, the scatter between the models when orphan satellites are included can be larger than a factor of 2 for scales smaller than 1 Mpc/h. We also show that galaxy formation models that do not include orphan satellite galaxies have a significantly lower 2PCF on small scales, consistent with previous studies. Finally, we show that the 2PCF of orphan satellites is remarkably different between SAMs and HOD models. Orphan satellites in SAMs present a higher clustering than in HOD models because they tend to occupy more massive haloes. We conclude that orphan satellites have an important role on galaxy clustering and they are the main cause of the differences in the clustering between HOD models and SAMs. △ Less

Submitted 13 April, 2017; v1 submitted 8 February, 2017; originally announced February 2017.

Comments: 17 pages, 7 figures

Sussing Merger Trees: Stability and Convergence

Authors: Yang Wang, Frazer R. Pearce, Alexander Knebe, Aurel Schneider, Chaichalit Srisawat, Dylan Tweed, Intae Jung, Jiaxin Han, John Helly, Julian Onions, Pascal J. Elahi, Peter A. Thomas, Peter Behroozi, Sukyoung K. Yi, Vicente Rodriguez-Gomez, Yao-Yuan Mao, Yipeng Jing, Weipeng Lin

Abstract: Merger trees are routinely used to follow the growth and merging history of dark matter haloes and subhaloes in simulations of cosmic structure formation. Srisawat et al. (2013) compared a wide range of merger-tree-building codes. Here we test the influence of output strategies and mass resolution on tree-building. We find that, somewhat surprisingly, building the tree from more snapshots does not… ▽ More Merger trees are routinely used to follow the growth and merging history of dark matter haloes and subhaloes in simulations of cosmic structure formation. Srisawat et al. (2013) compared a wide range of merger-tree-building codes. Here we test the influence of output strategies and mass resolution on tree-building. We find that, somewhat surprisingly, building the tree from more snapshots does not generally produce more complete trees; instead, it tends to short- en them. Significant improvements are seen for patching schemes which attempt to bridge over occasional dropouts in the underlying halo catalogues or schemes which combine the halo-finding and tree-building steps seamlessly. The adopted output strategy does not affec- t the average number of branches (bushiness) of the resultant merger trees. However, mass resolution has an influence on both main branch length and the bushiness. As the resolution increases, a halo with the same mass can be traced back further in time and will encounter more small progenitors during its evolutionary history. Given these results, we recommend that, for simulations intended as precursors for galaxy formation models where of order 100 or more snapshots are analysed, the tree-building routine should be integrated with the halo finder, or at the very least be able to patch over multiple adjacent snapshots. △ Less

Submitted 5 April, 2016; originally announced April 2016.

Comments: 16 pages, 14 figures, accepted by MNRAS

Sussing Merger Trees: A proposed Merger Tree data format

Authors: Peter A. Thomas, Julian Onions, Dylan Tweed, Andrew J. Benson, Darren Croton, Pascal Elahi, Bruno Henriques, Ilian T. Iliev, Alexander Knebe, Hanni Lux, Yao-Yuan Mao, Mark Neyrinck, Frazer R. Pearce, Vicente Rodriguez-Gomez, Aurel Schneider, Chaichalit Srisawat

Abstract: We propose a common terminology for use in describing both temporal merger trees and spatial structure trees for dark-matter halos. We specify a unified data format in HDF5 and provide example I/O routines in C, FORTRAN and PYTHON. We propose a common terminology for use in describing both temporal merger trees and spatial structure trees for dark-matter halos. We specify a unified data format in HDF5 and provide example I/O routines in C, FORTRAN and PYTHON. △ Less

Submitted 21 August, 2015; originally announced August 2015.

Comments: Technical report: a proposed merger tree data format. Not submitted to any journal. Source code available at https://bitbucket.org/ProfPAThomas/mergertree

nIFTy Cosmology: Comparison of Galaxy Formation Models

Authors: Alexander Knebe, Frazer R. Pearce, Peter A. Thomas, Andrew Benson, Jeremy Blaizot, Richard Bower, Jorge Carretero, Francisco J. Castander, Andrea Cattaneo, Sofia A. Cora, Darren J. Croton, Weiguang Cui, Daniel Cunnama, Gabriella De Lucia, Julien E. Devriendt, Pascal J. Elahi, Andreea Font, Fabio Fontanot, Juan Garcia-Bellido, Ignacio D. Gargiulo, Violeta Gonzalez-Perez, John Helly, Bruno Henriques, Michaela Hirschmann, Jaehyun Lee , et al. (11 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: We present a comparison of 14 galaxy formation models: 12 different semi-analytical models and 2 halo-occupation distribution models for galaxy formation based upon the same cosmological simulation and merger tree information derived from it. The participating codes have proven to be very successful in their own right but they have all been calibrated independently using various observational data… ▽ More We present a comparison of 14 galaxy formation models: 12 different semi-analytical models and 2 halo-occupation distribution models for galaxy formation based upon the same cosmological simulation and merger tree information derived from it. The participating codes have proven to be very successful in their own right but they have all been calibrated independently using various observational data sets, stellar models, and merger trees. In this paper we apply them without recalibration and this leads to a wide variety of predictions for the stellar mass function, specific star formation rates, stellar-to- halo mass ratios, and the abundance of orphan galaxies. The scatter is much larger than seen in previous comparison studies primarily because the codes have been used outside of their native environment within which they are well tested and calibrated. The purpose of the `nIFTy comparison of galaxy formation models' is to bring together as many different galaxy formation modellers as possible and to investigate a common approach to model calibration. This paper provides a unified description for all participating models and presents the initial, uncalibrated comparison as a baseline for our future studies where we will develop a common calibration framework and address the extent to which that reduces the scatter in the model predictions seen here. △ Less

Submitted 18 May, 2015; originally announced May 2015.

Comments: 35 pages, 20 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS

Matter power spectrum and the challenge of percent accuracy

Authors: Aurel Schneider, Romain Teyssier, Doug Potter, Joachim Stadel, Julian Onions, Darren S. Reed, Robert E. Smith, Volker Springel, Frazer R. Pearce, Roman Scoccimarro

Abstract: Future galaxy surveys require one percent precision in the theoretical knowledge of the power spectrum over a large range including very nonlinear scales. While this level of accuracy is easily obtained in the linear regime with perturbation theory, it represents a serious challenge for small scales where numerical simulations are required. In this paper we quantify the precision of present-day… ▽ More Future galaxy surveys require one percent precision in the theoretical knowledge of the power spectrum over a large range including very nonlinear scales. While this level of accuracy is easily obtained in the linear regime with perturbation theory, it represents a serious challenge for small scales where numerical simulations are required. In this paper we quantify the precision of present-day $N$-body methods, identifying main potential error sources from the set-up of initial conditions to the measurement of the final power spectrum. We directly compare three widely used $N$-body codes, Ramses, Pkdgrav3, and Gadget3 which represent three main discretisation techniques: the particle-mesh method, the tree method, and a hybrid combination of the two. For standard run parameters, the codes agree to within one percent at $k\leq1$ $h\,\rm Mpc^{-1}$ and to within three percent at $k\leq10$ $h\,\rm Mpc^{-1}$. We also consider the bispectrum and show that the reduced bispectra agree at the sub-percent level for $k\leq 2$ $h\,\rm Mpc^{-1}$. In a second step, we quantify potential errors due to initial conditions, box size, and resolution using an extended suite of simulations performed with our fastest code Pkdgrav3. We demonstrate that the simulation box size should not be smaller than $L=0.5$ $h^{-1}\rm Gpc$ to avoid systematic finite-volume effects (while much larger boxes are required to beat down the statistical sample variance). Furthermore, a maximum particle mass of $M_{\rm p}=10^{9}$ $h^{-1}\rm M_{\odot}$ is required to conservatively obtain one percent precision of the matter power spectrum. As a consequence, numerical simulations covering large survey volumes of upcoming missions such as DES, LSST, and Euclid will need more than a trillion particles to reproduce clustering properties at the targeted accuracy. △ Less

Submitted 25 April, 2016; v1 submitted 19 March, 2015; originally announced March 2015.

Comments: matches published version

Solving the puzzle of subhalo spins

Authors: Yang Wang, Weipeng Lin, Frazer R. Pearce, Hanni Lux, Stuart I. Muldrew, Julian Onions

Abstract: Investigating the spin parameter distribution of subhaloes in two high resolution isolated halo simulations, re- cent work by Onions et al. suggested that typical subhalo spins are consistently lower than the spin distribution found for field haloes. To further examine this puzzle, we have analyzed simulations of a cosmological volume with sufficient resolution to resolve a significant subhalo pop… ▽ More Investigating the spin parameter distribution of subhaloes in two high resolution isolated halo simulations, re- cent work by Onions et al. suggested that typical subhalo spins are consistently lower than the spin distribution found for field haloes. To further examine this puzzle, we have analyzed simulations of a cosmological volume with sufficient resolution to resolve a significant subhalo population. We confirm the result of Onions et al. and show that the typical spin of a subhalo decreases with decreasing mass and increasing proximity to the host halo center. We interpret this as the growing influence of tidal stripping in removing the outer layers, and hence the higher angular momentum particles, of the subhaloes as they move within the host potential. Investigating the redshift dependence of this effect, we find that the typical subhalo spin is smaller with decreasing redshift. This indicates a temporal evolution as expected in the tidal stripping scenario. △ Less

Submitted 14 January, 2015; originally announced January 2015.

Comments: 10 pages; 5 figures

Journal ref: Yang Wang et al. 2015 ApJ 801 93

Sussing Merger Trees : The Impact of Halo Merger Trees on Galaxy Properties in a Semi-Analytic Model

Authors: Jaehyun Lee, Sukyoung K. Yi, Pascal J. Elahi, Peter A. Thomas, Frazer R. Pearce, Peter Behroozi, Jiaxin Han, John Helly, Intae Jung, Alexander Knebe, Yao-Yuan Mao, Julian Onions, Vicente Rodriguez-Gomez, Aurel Schneider, Chaichalit Srisawat, Dylan Tweed

Abstract: A halo merger tree forms the essential backbone of a semi-analytic model for galaxy formation and evolution. Recent studies have pointed out that extracting merger trees from numerical simulations of structure formation is non-trivial; different tree building algorithms can give differing merger histories. These differences should be carefully understood before merger trees are used as input for m… ▽ More A halo merger tree forms the essential backbone of a semi-analytic model for galaxy formation and evolution. Recent studies have pointed out that extracting merger trees from numerical simulations of structure formation is non-trivial; different tree building algorithms can give differing merger histories. These differences should be carefully understood before merger trees are used as input for models of galaxy formation. We investigate the impact of different halo merger trees on a semi-analytic model. We find that the z=0 galaxy properties in our model show differences between trees when using a common parameter set. The star formation history of the Universe and the properties of satellite galaxies can show marked differences between trees with different construction methods. Independently calibrating the semi-analytic model for each tree can reduce the discrepancies between the z=0 global galaxy properties, at the cost of increasing the differences in the evolutionary histories of galaxies. Furthermore, the underlying physics implied can vary, resulting in key quantities such as the supernova feedback efficiency differing by factors of 2. Such a change alters the regimes where star formation is primarily suppressed by supernovae. Therefore, halo merger trees extracted from a common halo catalogue using different, but reliable, algorithms can result in a difference in the semi-analytic model. Given the uncertainties in galaxy formation physics, however, these differences may not necessarily be viewed as significant. △ Less

Submitted 5 October, 2014; originally announced October 2014.

Comments: 15 pages, 18 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS

The life and death of cosmic voids

Authors: P. M. Sutter, Pascal Elahi, Bridget Falck, Julian Onions, Nico Hamaus, Alexander Knebe, Chaichalit Srisawat, Aurel Schneider

Abstract: We investigate the formation, growth, merger history, movement, and destruction of cosmic voids detected via the watershed transform code VIDE in a cosmological N-body dark matter ΛCDM simulation. By adapting a method used to construct halo merger trees, we are able to trace individual voids back to their initial appearance and record the merging and evolution of their progenitors at high redshift… ▽ More We investigate the formation, growth, merger history, movement, and destruction of cosmic voids detected via the watershed transform code VIDE in a cosmological N-body dark matter ΛCDM simulation. By adapting a method used to construct halo merger trees, we are able to trace individual voids back to their initial appearance and record the merging and evolution of their progenitors at high redshift. For the scales of void sizes captured in our simulation, we find that the void formation rate peaks at scale factor 0.3, which coincides with a growth in the void hierarchy and the emergence of dark energy. Voids of all sizes appear at all scale factors, though the median initial void size decreases with time. When voids become detectable they have nearly their present-day volumes. Almost all voids have relatively stable growth rates and suffer only infrequent minor mergers. Dissolution of a void via merging is very rare. Instead, most voids maintain their distinct identity as annexed subvoids of a larger parent. The smallest voids are collapsing at the present epoch, but void destruction ceases after scale factor 0.3. In addition, voids centers tend to move very little, less than 0.01 of their effective radii per ln a, over their lifetimes. Overall, most voids exhibit little radical dynamical evolution; their quiet lives make them pristine probes of cosmological initial conditions and the imprint of dark energy. △ Less

Submitted 20 September, 2014; v1 submitted 28 March, 2014; originally announced March 2014.

Comments: 11 pages, 12 figures, MNRAS accepted, minor revisions from referee comments

Sussing Merger Trees: the influence of the halo finder

Authors: Santiago Avila, Alexander Knebe, Frazer R. Pearce, Aurel Schneider, Chaichalit Srisawat, Peter A. Thomas, Peter Behroozi, Pascal J. Elahi, Jiaxin Han, Yao-Yuan Mao, Julian Onions, Vicente Rodriguez-Gomez

Abstract: Merger tree codes are routinely used to follow the growth and merger of dark matter haloes in simulations of cosmic structure formation. Whereas in Srisawat et. al. we compared the trees built using a wide variety of such codes here we study the influence of the underlying halo catalogue upon the resulting trees. We observe that the specifics of halo finding itself greatly influences the construct… ▽ More Merger tree codes are routinely used to follow the growth and merger of dark matter haloes in simulations of cosmic structure formation. Whereas in Srisawat et. al. we compared the trees built using a wide variety of such codes here we study the influence of the underlying halo catalogue upon the resulting trees. We observe that the specifics of halo finding itself greatly influences the constructed merger trees. We find that the choices made to define the halo mass are of prime importance. For instance, amongst many potential options different finders select self-bound objects or spherical regions of defined overdensity, decide whether or not to include substructures within the mass returned and vary in their initial particle selection. The impact of these decisions is seen in tree length (the period of time a particularly halo can be traced back through the simulation), branching ratio (essentially the merger rate of \subhalos) and mass evolution. We therefore conclude that the choice of the underlying halo finder is more relevant to the process of building merger trees than the tree builder itself. We also report on some built-in features of specific merger tree codes that (sometimes) help to improve the quality of the merger trees produced. △ Less

Submitted 28 April, 2014; v1 submitted 11 February, 2014; originally announced February 2014.

Comments: Accepted in MNRAS. 15 pages, 10 figures, 1 table

Subhaloes gone Notts: Subhaloes as tracers of the dark matter halo shape

Authors: Kai Hoffmann, Susana Planelles, Enrique Gaztanaga, Alexander Knebe, Frazer R. Pearce, Hanni Lux, Julian Onions, Stuart I. Muldrew, Pascal Elahi, Peter Behroozi, Yago Ascasibar, Jiaxin Han, Michal Maciejewski, Manuel E. Merchan, Mark Neyrinck, Andrés N. Ruiz, Mario A. Sgro

Abstract: We study the shapes of subhalo distributions from four dark-matter-only simulations of Milky Way type haloes. Comparing the shapes derived from the subhalo distributions at high resolution to those of the underlying dark matter fields we find the former to be more triaxial if theanalysis is restricted to massive subhaloes. For three of the four analysed haloes the increased triaxiality of the dist… ▽ More We study the shapes of subhalo distributions from four dark-matter-only simulations of Milky Way type haloes. Comparing the shapes derived from the subhalo distributions at high resolution to those of the underlying dark matter fields we find the former to be more triaxial if theanalysis is restricted to massive subhaloes. For three of the four analysed haloes the increased triaxiality of the distributions of massive subhaloes can be explained by a systematic effect caused by the low number of objects. Subhaloes of the fourth halo show indications for anisotropic accretion via their strong triaxial distribution and orbit alignment with respect to the dark matter field. These results are independent of the employed subhalo finder. Comparing the shape of the observed Milky Way satellite distribution to those of high-resolution subhalo samples from simulations, we find an agreement for samples of bright satellites, but significant deviations if faint satellites are included in the analysis. These deviations might result from observational incompleteness. △ Less

Submitted 10 September, 2014; v1 submitted 9 January, 2014; originally announced January 2014.

Comments: 15 pages, 11 figures, 2 tables. 1 figure removed to reduce paper extension, shorter discussion, accepted for publication in MNRAS

Subhaloes gone Notts: the clustering properties of subhaloes

Authors: Arnau Pujol, Enrique Gaztanaga, Carlo Giocoli, Alexander Knebe, Frazer R. Pearce, Ramin A. Skibba, Yago Ascasibar, Peter Behroozi, Pascal Elahi, Jiaxin Han, Hanni Lux, Stuart I. Muldrew, Mark Neyrinck, Julian Onions, Doug Potter, Dylan Tweed

Abstract: We present a study of the substructure finder dependence of subhalo clustering in the Aquarius Simulation. We run 11 different subhalo finders on the haloes of the Aquarius Simulation and we study their differences in the density profile, mass fraction and 2-point correlation function of subhaloes in haloes. We also study the mass and vmax dependence of subhalo clustering. As the Aquarius Simulati… ▽ More We present a study of the substructure finder dependence of subhalo clustering in the Aquarius Simulation. We run 11 different subhalo finders on the haloes of the Aquarius Simulation and we study their differences in the density profile, mass fraction and 2-point correlation function of subhaloes in haloes. We also study the mass and vmax dependence of subhalo clustering. As the Aquarius Simulation has been run at different resolutions, we study the convergence with higher resolutions. We find that the agreement between finders is at around the 10% level inside R200 and at intermediate resolutions when a mass threshold is applied, and better than 5% when vmax is restricted instead of mass. However, some discrepancies appear in the highest resolution, underlined by an observed resolution dependence of subhalo clustering. This dependence is stronger for the smallest subhaloes, which are more clustered in the highest resolution, due to the detection of subhaloes within subhaloes (the sub-subhalo term). This effect modifies the mass dependence of clustering in the highest resolutions. We discuss implications of our results for models of subhalo clustering and their relation with galaxy clustering. △ Less

Submitted 22 January, 2014; v1 submitted 2 October, 2013; originally announced October 2013.

Comments: 19 pages, 15 figures

Journal ref: MNRAS, 438, 3205 (2014)

Sussing Merger Trees: The Merger Trees Comparison Project

Authors: Chaichalit Srisawat, Alexander Knebe, Frazer R. Pearce, Aurel Schneider, Peter A. Thomas, Peter Behroozi, Klaus Dolag, Pascal J. Elahi, Jiaxin Han, John Helly, Yipeng Jing, Intae Jung, Jaehyun Lee, Yao Yuan Mao, Julian Onions, Vicente Rodriguez-Gomez, Dylan Tweed, Sukyoung K. Yi

Abstract: Merger trees follow the growth and merger of dark-matter haloes over cosmic history. As well as giving important insights into the growth of cosmic structure in their own right, they provide an essential backbone to semi-analytic models of galaxy formation. This paper is the first in a series to arise from the SUSSING MERGER TREES Workshop in which ten different tree-building algorithms were appli… ▽ More Merger trees follow the growth and merger of dark-matter haloes over cosmic history. As well as giving important insights into the growth of cosmic structure in their own right, they provide an essential backbone to semi-analytic models of galaxy formation. This paper is the first in a series to arise from the SUSSING MERGER TREES Workshop in which ten different tree-building algorithms were applied to the same set of halo catalogues and their results compared. Although many of these codes were similar in nature, all algorithms produced distinct results. Our main conclusions are that a useful merger-tree code should possess the following features: (i) the use of particle IDs to match haloes between snapshots; (ii) the ability to skip at least one, and preferably more, snapshots in order to recover subhaloes that are temporarily lost during merging; (iii) the ability to cope with (and ideally smooth out) large, temporary flucuations in halo mass. Finally, to enable different groups to communicate effectively, we defined a common terminology that we used when discussing merger trees and we encourage others to adopt the same language. We also specified a minimal output format to record the results. △ Less

Submitted 10 October, 2013; v1 submitted 12 July, 2013; originally announced July 2013.

Comments: 14 pages,11 figures

Streams Going Notts: The tidal debris finder comparison project

Authors: Pascal J. Elahi, Jiaxin Han, Hanni Lux, Yago Ascasibar, Peter Behroozi, Alexander Knebe, Stuart I. Muldrew, Julian Onions, Frazer Pearce

Abstract: While various codes exist to systematically and robustly find haloes and subhaloes in cosmological simulations (Knebe et al., 2011, Onions et al., 2012), this is the first work to introduce and rigorously test codes that find tidal debris (streams and other unbound substructure) in fully cosmological simulations of structure formation. We use one tracking and three non-tracking codes to identify s… ▽ More While various codes exist to systematically and robustly find haloes and subhaloes in cosmological simulations (Knebe et al., 2011, Onions et al., 2012), this is the first work to introduce and rigorously test codes that find tidal debris (streams and other unbound substructure) in fully cosmological simulations of structure formation. We use one tracking and three non-tracking codes to identify substructure (bound and unbound) in a Milky Way type simulation from the Aquarius suite (Springel et al., 2008) and post-process their output with a common pipeline to determine the properties of these substructures in a uniform way. By using output from a fully cosmological simulation, we also take a step beyond previous studies of tidal debris that have used simple toy models. We find that both tracking and non-tracking codes agree well on the identification of subhaloes and more importantly, the {\em unbound tidal features} associated with them. The distributions of basic properties of the total substructure distribution (mass, velocity dispersion, position) are recovered with a scatter of $\sim20%$. Using the tracking code as our reference, we show that the non-tracking codes identify complex tidal debris with purities of $\sim40%$. Analysing the results of the substructure finders, we find that the general distribution of {\em substructures} differ significantly from the distribution of bound {\em subhaloes}. Most importantly, both bound and unbound {\em substructures} together constitute $\sim18%$ of the host halo mass, which is a factor of $\sim2$ higher than the fraction in self-bound {\em subhaloes}. However, this result is restricted by the remaining challenge to cleanly define when an unbound structure has become part of the host halo. Nevertheless, the more general substructure distribution provides a more complete picture of a halo's accretion history. △ Less

Submitted 10 May, 2013; originally announced May 2013.

Comments: 19 pages, 12 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS

Structure Finding in Cosmological Simulations: The State of Affairs

Authors: Alexander Knebe, Frazer R. Pearce, Hanni Lux, Yago Ascasibar, Peter Behroozi, Javier Casado, Christine Corbett Moran, Juerg Diemand, Klaus Dolag, Rosa Dominguez-Tenreiro, Pascal Elahi, Bridget Falck, Stefan Gottloeber, Jiaxin Han, Anatoly Klypin, Zarija Lukic, Michal Maciejewski, Cameron K. McBride, Manuel E. Merchan, Stuart I. Muldrew, Mark Neyrinck, Julian Onions, Susana Planelles, Doug Potter, Vicent Quilis , et al. (10 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: The ever increasing size and complexity of data coming from simulations of cosmic structure formation demands equally sophisticated tools for their analysis. During the past decade, the art of object finding in these simulations has hence developed into an important discipline itself. A multitude of codes based upon a huge variety of methods and techniques have been spawned yet the question remain… ▽ More The ever increasing size and complexity of data coming from simulations of cosmic structure formation demands equally sophisticated tools for their analysis. During the past decade, the art of object finding in these simulations has hence developed into an important discipline itself. A multitude of codes based upon a huge variety of methods and techniques have been spawned yet the question remained as to whether or not they will provide the same (physical) information about the structures of interest. Here we summarize and extent previous work of the "halo finder comparison project": we investigate in detail the (possible) origin of any deviations across finders. To this extent we decipher and discuss differences in halo finding methods, clearly separating them from the disparity in definitions of halo properties. We observe that different codes not only find different numbers of objects leading to a scatter of up to 20 per cent in the halo mass and Vmax function, but also that the particulars of those objects that are identified by all finders differ. The strength of the variation, however, depends on the property studied, e.g. the scatter in position, bulk velocity, mass, and the peak value of the rotation curve is practically below a few per cent, whereas derived quantities such as spin and shape show larger deviations. Our study indicates that the prime contribution to differences in halo properties across codes stems from the distinct particle collection methods and -- to a minor extent -- the particular aspects of how the procedure for removing unbound particles is implemented. We close with a discussion of the relevance and implications of the scatter across different codes for other fields such as semi-analytical galaxy formation models, gravitational lensing, and observables in general. △ Less

Submitted 26 July, 2013; v1 submitted 2 April, 2013; originally announced April 2013.

Comments: 28 pages containing 13 figures & 4 tables + 9 pages appendix containing another 4 tables + 4 pages of references, accepted for publication in MNRAS

Subhaloes gone Notts: Spin across subhaloes and finders

Authors: Julian Onions, Yago Ascasibar, Peter Behroozi, Javier Casado, Pascal Elahi, Jiaxin Han, Alexander Knebe, Hanni Lux, Manuel E. Merchán, Stuart I. Muldrew, Mark Neyrinck, Lyndsay Old, Frazer R. Pearce, Doug Potter, Andrés N. Ruiz, Mario A. Sgró, Dylan Tweed, Thomas Yue

Abstract: We present a study of a comparison of spin distributions of subhaloes found associated with a host halo. The subhaloes are found within two cosmological simulation families of Milky Way-like galaxies, namely the Aquarius and GHALO simulations. These two simulations use different gravity codes and cosmologies. We employ ten different substructure finders, which span a wide range of methodologies fr… ▽ More We present a study of a comparison of spin distributions of subhaloes found associated with a host halo. The subhaloes are found within two cosmological simulation families of Milky Way-like galaxies, namely the Aquarius and GHALO simulations. These two simulations use different gravity codes and cosmologies. We employ ten different substructure finders, which span a wide range of methodologies from simple overdensity in configuration space to full 6-d phase space analysis of particles.We subject the results to a common post-processing pipeline to analyse the results in a consistent manner, recovering the dimensionless spin parameter. We find that spin distribution is an excellent indicator of how well the removal of background particles (unbinding) has been carried out. We also find that the spin distribution decreases for substructure the nearer they are to the host halo's, and that the value of the spin parameter rises with enclosed mass towards the edge of the substructure. Finally subhaloes are less rotationally supported than field haloes, with the peak of the spin distribution having a lower spin parameter. △ Less

Submitted 4 December, 2012; originally announced December 2012.

Comments: 10 pages, 14 figures and 3 tables. Accepted for publication in MNRAS

Journal ref: MNRAS (March 1, 2013) 429 (3): 2739-2747

Galaxies going MAD: The Galaxy-Finder Comparison Project

Authors: Alexander Knebe, Noam I. Libeskind, Frazer Pearce, Peter Behroozi, Javier Casado, Klaus Dolag, Rosa Dominguez-Tenreiro, Pascal Elahi, Hanni Lux, Stuart I. Muldrew, Julian Onions

Abstract: With the ever increasing size and complexity of fully self-consistent simulations of galaxy formation within the framework of the cosmic web, the demands upon object finders for these simulations has simultaneously grown. To this extent we initiated the Halo Finder Comparison Project that gathered together all the experts in the field and has so far led to two comparison papers, one for dark matte… ▽ More With the ever increasing size and complexity of fully self-consistent simulations of galaxy formation within the framework of the cosmic web, the demands upon object finders for these simulations has simultaneously grown. To this extent we initiated the Halo Finder Comparison Project that gathered together all the experts in the field and has so far led to two comparison papers, one for dark matter field haloes (Knebe et al. 2011), and one for dark matter subhaloes (Onions et al. 2012). However, as state-of-the-art simulation codes are perfectly capable of not only following the formation and evolution of dark matter but also account for baryonic physics (e.g. hydrodynamics, star formation, feedback) object finders should also be capable of taking these additional processes into consideration. Here we report on a comparison of codes as applied to the Constrained Local UniversE Simulation (CLUES) of the formation of the Local Group which incorporates much of the physics relevant for galaxy formation. We compare both the properties of the three main galaxies in the simulation (representing the MW, M31, and M33) as well as their satellite populations for a variety of halo finders ranging from phase-space to velocity-space to spherical overdensity based codes, including also a mere baryonic object finder. We obtain agreement amongst codes comparable to (if not better than) our previous comparisons, at least for the total, dark, and stellar components of the objects. However, the diffuse gas content of the haloes shows great disparity, especially for low-mass satellite galaxies. This is primarily due to differences in the treatment of the thermal energy during the unbinding procedure. We acknowledge that the handling of gas in halo finders is something that needs to be dealt with carefully, and the precise treatment may depend sensitively upon the scientific problem being studied. △ Less

Submitted 26 July, 2013; v1 submitted 9 October, 2012; originally announced October 2012.

Comments: 14 interesting pages, 17 beautiful figures, and 2 informative tables accepted for publication in MNRAS (matches published version)

SubHaloes going Notts: The SubHalo-Finder Comparison Project

Authors: Julian Onions, Alexander Knebe, Frazer R. Pearce, Stuart I. Muldrew, Hanni Lux, Steffen R. Knollmann, Yago Ascasibar, Peter Behroozi, Pascal Elahi, Jiaxin Han, Michal Maciejewski, Manuel E. Merchán, Mark Neyrinck, Andrés N. Ruiz, Mario A. Sgró, Volker Springel, Dylan Tweed

Abstract: We present a detailed comparison of the substructure properties of a single Milky Way sized dark matter halo from the Aquarius suite at five different resolutions, as identified by a variety of different (sub-)halo finders for simulations of cosmic structure formation. These finders span a wide range of techniques and methodologies to extract and quantify substructures within a larger non-homogene… ▽ More We present a detailed comparison of the substructure properties of a single Milky Way sized dark matter halo from the Aquarius suite at five different resolutions, as identified by a variety of different (sub-)halo finders for simulations of cosmic structure formation. These finders span a wide range of techniques and methodologies to extract and quantify substructures within a larger non-homogeneous background density (e.g. a host halo). This includes real-space, phase-space, velocity-space and time- space based finders, as well as finders employing a Voronoi tessellation, friends-of-friends techniques, or refined meshes as the starting point for locating substructure.A common post-processing pipeline was used to uniformly analyse the particle lists provided by each finder. We extract quantitative and comparable measures for the subhaloes, primarily focusing on mass and the peak of the rotation curve for this particular study. We find that all of the finders agree extremely well on the presence and location of substructure and even for properties relating to the inner part part of the subhalo (e.g. the maximum value of the rotation curve). For properties that rely on particles near the outer edge of the subhalo the agreement is at around the 20 per cent level. We find that basic properties (mass, maximum circular velocity) of a subhalo can be reliably recovered if the subhalo contains more than 100 particles although its presence can be reliably inferred for a lower particle number limit of 20. We finally note that the logarithmic slope of the subhalo cumulative number count is remarkably consistent and <1 for all the finders that reached high resolution. If correct, this would indicate that the larger and more massive, respectively, substructures are the most dynamically interesting and that higher levels of the (sub-)subhalo hierarchy become progressively less important. △ Less

Submitted 16 March, 2012; originally announced March 2012.

Comments: 16 pages, 7 figures, 2 tables, Accepted for MNRAS

Journal ref: MNRAS, 423 (2012): 1200--1214