-
Population-based Evaluation in Repeated Rock-Paper-Scissors as a Benchmark for Multiagent Reinforcement Learning
Authors:
Marc Lanctot,
John Schultz,
Neil Burch,
Max Olan Smith,
Daniel Hennes,
Thomas Anthony,
Julien Perolat
Abstract:
Progress in fields of machine learning and adversarial planning has benefited significantly from benchmark domains, from checkers and the classic UCI data sets to Go and Diplomacy. In sequential decision-making, agent evaluation has largely been restricted to few interactions against experts, with the aim to reach some desired level of performance (e.g. beating a human professional player). We pro…
▽ More
Progress in fields of machine learning and adversarial planning has benefited significantly from benchmark domains, from checkers and the classic UCI data sets to Go and Diplomacy. In sequential decision-making, agent evaluation has largely been restricted to few interactions against experts, with the aim to reach some desired level of performance (e.g. beating a human professional player). We propose a benchmark for multiagent learning based on repeated play of the simple game Rock, Paper, Scissors along with a population of forty-three tournament entries, some of which are intentionally sub-optimal. We describe metrics to measure the quality of agents based both on average returns and exploitability. We then show that several RL, online learning, and language model approaches can learn good counter-strategies and generalize well, but ultimately lose to the top-performing bots, creating an opportunity for research in multiagent learning.
△ Less
Submitted 31 October, 2023; v1 submitted 2 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Developing, Evaluating and Scaling Learning Agents in Multi-Agent Environments
Authors:
Ian Gemp,
Thomas Anthony,
Yoram Bachrach,
Avishkar Bhoopchand,
Kalesha Bullard,
Jerome Connor,
Vibhavari Dasagi,
Bart De Vylder,
Edgar Duenez-Guzman,
Romuald Elie,
Richard Everett,
Daniel Hennes,
Edward Hughes,
Mina Khan,
Marc Lanctot,
Kate Larson,
Guy Lever,
Siqi Liu,
Luke Marris,
Kevin R. McKee,
Paul Muller,
Julien Perolat,
Florian Strub,
Andrea Tacchetti,
Eugene Tarassov
, et al. (2 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Game Theory & Multi-Agent team at DeepMind studies several aspects of multi-agent learning ranging from computing approximations to fundamental concepts in game theory to simulating social dilemmas in rich spatial environments and training 3-d humanoids in difficult team coordination tasks. A signature aim of our group is to use the resources and expertise made available to us at DeepMind in d…
▽ More
The Game Theory & Multi-Agent team at DeepMind studies several aspects of multi-agent learning ranging from computing approximations to fundamental concepts in game theory to simulating social dilemmas in rich spatial environments and training 3-d humanoids in difficult team coordination tasks. A signature aim of our group is to use the resources and expertise made available to us at DeepMind in deep reinforcement learning to explore multi-agent systems in complex environments and use these benchmarks to advance our understanding. Here, we summarise the recent work of our team and present a taxonomy that we feel highlights many important open challenges in multi-agent research.
△ Less
Submitted 22 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Learning Correlated Equilibria in Mean-Field Games
Authors:
Paul Muller,
Romuald Elie,
Mark Rowland,
Mathieu Lauriere,
Julien Perolat,
Sarah Perrin,
Matthieu Geist,
Georgios Piliouras,
Olivier Pietquin,
Karl Tuyls
Abstract:
The designs of many large-scale systems today, from traffic routing environments to smart grids, rely on game-theoretic equilibrium concepts. However, as the size of an $N$-player game typically grows exponentially with $N$, standard game theoretic analysis becomes effectively infeasible beyond a low number of players. Recent approaches have gone around this limitation by instead considering Mean-…
▽ More
The designs of many large-scale systems today, from traffic routing environments to smart grids, rely on game-theoretic equilibrium concepts. However, as the size of an $N$-player game typically grows exponentially with $N$, standard game theoretic analysis becomes effectively infeasible beyond a low number of players. Recent approaches have gone around this limitation by instead considering Mean-Field games, an approximation of anonymous $N$-player games, where the number of players is infinite and the population's state distribution, instead of every individual player's state, is the object of interest. The practical computability of Mean-Field Nash equilibria, the most studied Mean-Field equilibrium to date, however, typically depends on beneficial non-generic structural properties such as monotonicity or contraction properties, which are required for known algorithms to converge. In this work, we provide an alternative route for studying Mean-Field games, by developing the concepts of Mean-Field correlated and coarse-correlated equilibria. We show that they can be efficiently learnt in \emph{all games}, without requiring any additional assumption on the structure of the game, using three classical algorithms. Furthermore, we establish correspondences between our notions and those already present in the literature, derive optimality bounds for the Mean-Field - $N$-player transition, and empirically demonstrate the convergence of these algorithms on simple games.
△ Less
Submitted 22 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
Mastering the Game of Stratego with Model-Free Multiagent Reinforcement Learning
Authors:
Julien Perolat,
Bart de Vylder,
Daniel Hennes,
Eugene Tarassov,
Florian Strub,
Vincent de Boer,
Paul Muller,
Jerome T. Connor,
Neil Burch,
Thomas Anthony,
Stephen McAleer,
Romuald Elie,
Sarah H. Cen,
Zhe Wang,
Audrunas Gruslys,
Aleksandra Malysheva,
Mina Khan,
Sherjil Ozair,
Finbarr Timbers,
Toby Pohlen,
Tom Eccles,
Mark Rowland,
Marc Lanctot,
Jean-Baptiste Lespiau,
Bilal Piot
, et al. (9 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We introduce DeepNash, an autonomous agent capable of learning to play the imperfect information game Stratego from scratch, up to a human expert level. Stratego is one of the few iconic board games that Artificial Intelligence (AI) has not yet mastered. This popular game has an enormous game tree on the order of $10^{535}$ nodes, i.e., $10^{175}$ times larger than that of Go. It has the additiona…
▽ More
We introduce DeepNash, an autonomous agent capable of learning to play the imperfect information game Stratego from scratch, up to a human expert level. Stratego is one of the few iconic board games that Artificial Intelligence (AI) has not yet mastered. This popular game has an enormous game tree on the order of $10^{535}$ nodes, i.e., $10^{175}$ times larger than that of Go. It has the additional complexity of requiring decision-making under imperfect information, similar to Texas hold'em poker, which has a significantly smaller game tree (on the order of $10^{164}$ nodes). Decisions in Stratego are made over a large number of discrete actions with no obvious link between action and outcome. Episodes are long, with often hundreds of moves before a player wins, and situations in Stratego can not easily be broken down into manageably-sized sub-problems as in poker. For these reasons, Stratego has been a grand challenge for the field of AI for decades, and existing AI methods barely reach an amateur level of play. DeepNash uses a game-theoretic, model-free deep reinforcement learning method, without search, that learns to master Stratego via self-play. The Regularised Nash Dynamics (R-NaD) algorithm, a key component of DeepNash, converges to an approximate Nash equilibrium, instead of 'cycling' around it, by directly modifying the underlying multi-agent learning dynamics. DeepNash beats existing state-of-the-art AI methods in Stratego and achieved a yearly (2022) and all-time top-3 rank on the Gravon games platform, competing with human expert players.
△ Less
Submitted 30 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
Learning in Mean Field Games: A Survey
Authors:
Mathieu Laurière,
Sarah Perrin,
Julien Pérolat,
Sertan Girgin,
Paul Muller,
Romuald Élie,
Matthieu Geist,
Olivier Pietquin
Abstract:
Non-cooperative and cooperative games with a very large number of players have many applications but remain generally intractable when the number of players increases. Introduced by Lasry and Lions, and Huang, Caines and Malhamé, Mean Field Games (MFGs) rely on a mean-field approximation to allow the number of players to grow to infinity. Traditional methods for solving these games generally rely…
▽ More
Non-cooperative and cooperative games with a very large number of players have many applications but remain generally intractable when the number of players increases. Introduced by Lasry and Lions, and Huang, Caines and Malhamé, Mean Field Games (MFGs) rely on a mean-field approximation to allow the number of players to grow to infinity. Traditional methods for solving these games generally rely on solving partial or stochastic differential equations with a full knowledge of the model. Recently, Reinforcement Learning (RL) has appeared promising to solve complex problems at scale. The combination of RL and MFGs is promising to solve games at a very large scale both in terms of population size and environment complexity. In this survey, we review the quickly growing recent literature on RL methods to learn equilibria and social optima in MFGs. We first identify the most common settings (static, stationary, and evolutive) of MFGs. We then present a general framework for classical iterative methods (based on best-response computation or policy evaluation) to solve MFGs in an exact way. Building on these algorithms and the connection with Markov Decision Processes, we explain how RL can be used to learn MFG solutions in a model-free way. Last, we present numerical illustrations on a benchmark problem, and conclude with some perspectives.
△ Less
Submitted 26 July, 2024; v1 submitted 25 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
Scalable Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithms for Mean Field Games
Authors:
Mathieu Laurière,
Sarah Perrin,
Sertan Girgin,
Paul Muller,
Ayush Jain,
Theophile Cabannes,
Georgios Piliouras,
Julien Pérolat,
Romuald Élie,
Olivier Pietquin,
Matthieu Geist
Abstract:
Mean Field Games (MFGs) have been introduced to efficiently approximate games with very large populations of strategic agents. Recently, the question of learning equilibria in MFGs has gained momentum, particularly using model-free reinforcement learning (RL) methods. One limiting factor to further scale up using RL is that existing algorithms to solve MFGs require the mixing of approximated quant…
▽ More
Mean Field Games (MFGs) have been introduced to efficiently approximate games with very large populations of strategic agents. Recently, the question of learning equilibria in MFGs has gained momentum, particularly using model-free reinforcement learning (RL) methods. One limiting factor to further scale up using RL is that existing algorithms to solve MFGs require the mixing of approximated quantities such as strategies or $q$-values. This is far from being trivial in the case of non-linear function approximation that enjoy good generalization properties, e.g. neural networks. We propose two methods to address this shortcoming. The first one learns a mixed strategy from distillation of historical data into a neural network and is applied to the Fictitious Play algorithm. The second one is an online mixing method based on regularization that does not require memorizing historical data or previous estimates. It is used to extend Online Mirror Descent. We demonstrate numerically that these methods efficiently enable the use of Deep RL algorithms to solve various MFGs. In addition, we show that these methods outperform SotA baselines from the literature.
△ Less
Submitted 17 June, 2022; v1 submitted 22 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Learning Equilibria in Mean-Field Games: Introducing Mean-Field PSRO
Authors:
Paul Muller,
Mark Rowland,
Romuald Elie,
Georgios Piliouras,
Julien Perolat,
Mathieu Lauriere,
Raphael Marinier,
Olivier Pietquin,
Karl Tuyls
Abstract:
Recent advances in multiagent learning have seen the introduction ofa family of algorithms that revolve around the population-based trainingmethod PSRO, showing convergence to Nash, correlated and coarse corre-lated equilibria. Notably, when the number of agents increases, learningbest-responses becomes exponentially more difficult, and as such ham-pers PSRO training methods. The paradigm of mean-…
▽ More
Recent advances in multiagent learning have seen the introduction ofa family of algorithms that revolve around the population-based trainingmethod PSRO, showing convergence to Nash, correlated and coarse corre-lated equilibria. Notably, when the number of agents increases, learningbest-responses becomes exponentially more difficult, and as such ham-pers PSRO training methods. The paradigm of mean-field games pro-vides an asymptotic solution to this problem when the considered gamesare anonymous-symmetric. Unfortunately, the mean-field approximationintroduces non-linearities which prevent a straightforward adaptation ofPSRO. Building upon optimization and adversarial regret minimization,this paper sidesteps this issue and introduces mean-field PSRO, an adap-tation of PSRO which learns Nash, coarse correlated and correlated equi-libria in mean-field games. The key is to replace the exact distributioncomputation step by newly-defined mean-field no-adversarial-regret learn-ers, or by black-box optimization. We compare the asymptotic complexityof the approach to standard PSRO, greatly improve empirical bandit con-vergence speed by compressing temporal mixture weights, and ensure itis theoretically robust to payoff noise. Finally, we illustrate the speed andaccuracy of mean-field PSRO on several mean-field games, demonstratingconvergence to strong and weak equilibria.
△ Less
Submitted 29 August, 2022; v1 submitted 16 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
Solving N-player dynamic routing games with congestion: a mean field approach
Authors:
Theophile Cabannes,
Mathieu Lauriere,
Julien Perolat,
Raphael Marinier,
Sertan Girgin,
Sarah Perrin,
Olivier Pietquin,
Alexandre M. Bayen,
Eric Goubault,
Romuald Elie
Abstract:
The recent emergence of navigational tools has changed traffic patterns and has now enabled new types of congestion-aware routing control like dynamic road pricing. Using the fundamental diagram of traffic flows - applied in macroscopic and mesoscopic traffic modeling - the article introduces a new N-player dynamic routing game with explicit congestion dynamics. The model is well-posed and can rep…
▽ More
The recent emergence of navigational tools has changed traffic patterns and has now enabled new types of congestion-aware routing control like dynamic road pricing. Using the fundamental diagram of traffic flows - applied in macroscopic and mesoscopic traffic modeling - the article introduces a new N-player dynamic routing game with explicit congestion dynamics. The model is well-posed and can reproduce heterogeneous departure times and congestion spill back phenomena. However, as Nash equilibrium computations are PPAD-complete, solving the game becomes intractable for large but realistic numbers of vehicles N. Therefore, the corresponding mean field game is also introduced. Experiments were performed on several classical benchmark networks of the traffic community: the Pigou, Braess, and Sioux Falls networks with heterogeneous origin, destination and departure time tuples. The Pigou and the Braess examples reveal that the mean field approximation is generally very accurate and computationally efficient as soon as the number of vehicles exceeds a few dozen. On the Sioux Falls network (76 links, 100 time steps), this approach enables learning traffic dynamics with more than 14,000 vehicles.
△ Less
Submitted 27 October, 2021; v1 submitted 22 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Shaking the foundations: delusions in sequence models for interaction and control
Authors:
Pedro A. Ortega,
Markus Kunesch,
Grégoire Delétang,
Tim Genewein,
Jordi Grau-Moya,
Joel Veness,
Jonas Buchli,
Jonas Degrave,
Bilal Piot,
Julien Perolat,
Tom Everitt,
Corentin Tallec,
Emilio Parisotto,
Tom Erez,
Yutian Chen,
Scott Reed,
Marcus Hutter,
Nando de Freitas,
Shane Legg
Abstract:
The recent phenomenal success of language models has reinvigorated machine learning research, and large sequence models such as transformers are being applied to a variety of domains. One important problem class that has remained relatively elusive however is purposeful adaptive behavior. Currently there is a common perception that sequence models "lack the understanding of the cause and effect of…
▽ More
The recent phenomenal success of language models has reinvigorated machine learning research, and large sequence models such as transformers are being applied to a variety of domains. One important problem class that has remained relatively elusive however is purposeful adaptive behavior. Currently there is a common perception that sequence models "lack the understanding of the cause and effect of their actions" leading them to draw incorrect inferences due to auto-suggestive delusions. In this report we explain where this mismatch originates, and show that it can be resolved by treating actions as causal interventions. Finally, we show that in supervised learning, one can teach a system to condition or intervene on data by training with factual and counterfactual error signals respectively.
△ Less
Submitted 20 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Generalization in Mean Field Games by Learning Master Policies
Authors:
Sarah Perrin,
Mathieu Laurière,
Julien Pérolat,
Romuald Élie,
Matthieu Geist,
Olivier Pietquin
Abstract:
Mean Field Games (MFGs) can potentially scale multi-agent systems to extremely large populations of agents. Yet, most of the literature assumes a single initial distribution for the agents, which limits the practical applications of MFGs. Machine Learning has the potential to solve a wider diversity of MFG problems thanks to generalizations capacities. We study how to leverage these generalization…
▽ More
Mean Field Games (MFGs) can potentially scale multi-agent systems to extremely large populations of agents. Yet, most of the literature assumes a single initial distribution for the agents, which limits the practical applications of MFGs. Machine Learning has the potential to solve a wider diversity of MFG problems thanks to generalizations capacities. We study how to leverage these generalization properties to learn policies enabling a typical agent to behave optimally against any population distribution. In reference to the Master equation in MFGs, we coin the term ``Master policies'' to describe them and we prove that a single Master policy provides a Nash equilibrium, whatever the initial distribution. We propose a method to learn such Master policies. Our approach relies on three ingredients: adding the current population distribution as part of the observation, approximating Master policies with neural networks, and training via Reinforcement Learning and Fictitious Play. We illustrate on numerical examples not only the efficiency of the learned Master policy but also its generalization capabilities beyond the distributions used for training.
△ Less
Submitted 20 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
Concave Utility Reinforcement Learning: the Mean-Field Game Viewpoint
Authors:
Matthieu Geist,
Julien Pérolat,
Mathieu Laurière,
Romuald Elie,
Sarah Perrin,
Olivier Bachem,
Rémi Munos,
Olivier Pietquin
Abstract:
Concave Utility Reinforcement Learning (CURL) extends RL from linear to concave utilities in the occupancy measure induced by the agent's policy. This encompasses not only RL but also imitation learning and exploration, among others. Yet, this more general paradigm invalidates the classical Bellman equations, and calls for new algorithms. Mean-field Games (MFGs) are a continuous approximation of m…
▽ More
Concave Utility Reinforcement Learning (CURL) extends RL from linear to concave utilities in the occupancy measure induced by the agent's policy. This encompasses not only RL but also imitation learning and exploration, among others. Yet, this more general paradigm invalidates the classical Bellman equations, and calls for new algorithms. Mean-field Games (MFGs) are a continuous approximation of many-agent RL. They consider the limit case of a continuous distribution of identical agents, anonymous with symmetric interests, and reduce the problem to the study of a single representative agent in interaction with the full population. Our core contribution consists in showing that CURL is a subclass of MFGs. We think this important to bridge together both communities. It also allows to shed light on aspects of both fields: we show the equivalence between concavity in CURL and monotonicity in the associated MFG, between optimality conditions in CURL and Nash equilibrium in MFG, or that Fictitious Play (FP) for this class of MFGs is simply Frank-Wolfe, bringing the first convergence rate for discrete-time FP for MFGs. We also experimentally demonstrate that, using algorithms recently introduced for solving MFGs, we can address the CURL problem more efficiently.
△ Less
Submitted 16 February, 2022; v1 submitted 7 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
Mean Field Games Flock! The Reinforcement Learning Way
Authors:
Sarah Perrin,
Mathieu Laurière,
Julien Pérolat,
Matthieu Geist,
Romuald Élie,
Olivier Pietquin
Abstract:
We present a method enabling a large number of agents to learn how to flock, which is a natural behavior observed in large populations of animals. This problem has drawn a lot of interest but requires many structural assumptions and is tractable only in small dimensions. We phrase this problem as a Mean Field Game (MFG), where each individual chooses its acceleration depending on the population be…
▽ More
We present a method enabling a large number of agents to learn how to flock, which is a natural behavior observed in large populations of animals. This problem has drawn a lot of interest but requires many structural assumptions and is tractable only in small dimensions. We phrase this problem as a Mean Field Game (MFG), where each individual chooses its acceleration depending on the population behavior. Combining Deep Reinforcement Learning (RL) and Normalizing Flows (NF), we obtain a tractable solution requiring only very weak assumptions. Our algorithm finds a Nash Equilibrium and the agents adapt their velocity to match the neighboring flock's average one. We use Fictitious Play and alternate: (1) computing an approximate best response with Deep RL, and (2) estimating the next population distribution with NF. We show numerically that our algorithm learn multi-group or high-dimensional flocking with obstacles.
△ Less
Submitted 17 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Scaling up Mean Field Games with Online Mirror Descent
Authors:
Julien Perolat,
Sarah Perrin,
Romuald Elie,
Mathieu Laurière,
Georgios Piliouras,
Matthieu Geist,
Karl Tuyls,
Olivier Pietquin
Abstract:
We address scaling up equilibrium computation in Mean Field Games (MFGs) using Online Mirror Descent (OMD). We show that continuous-time OMD provably converges to a Nash equilibrium under a natural and well-motivated set of monotonicity assumptions. This theoretical result nicely extends to multi-population games and to settings involving common noise. A thorough experimental investigation on vari…
▽ More
We address scaling up equilibrium computation in Mean Field Games (MFGs) using Online Mirror Descent (OMD). We show that continuous-time OMD provably converges to a Nash equilibrium under a natural and well-motivated set of monotonicity assumptions. This theoretical result nicely extends to multi-population games and to settings involving common noise. A thorough experimental investigation on various single and multi-population MFGs shows that OMD outperforms traditional algorithms such as Fictitious Play (FP). We empirically show that OMD scales up and converges significantly faster than FP by solving, for the first time to our knowledge, examples of MFGs with hundreds of billions states. This study establishes the state-of-the-art for learning in large-scale multi-agent and multi-population games.
△ Less
Submitted 28 February, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
Game Plan: What AI can do for Football, and What Football can do for AI
Authors:
Karl Tuyls,
Shayegan Omidshafiei,
Paul Muller,
Zhe Wang,
Jerome Connor,
Daniel Hennes,
Ian Graham,
William Spearman,
Tim Waskett,
Dafydd Steele,
Pauline Luc,
Adria Recasens,
Alexandre Galashov,
Gregory Thornton,
Romuald Elie,
Pablo Sprechmann,
Pol Moreno,
Kris Cao,
Marta Garnelo,
Praneet Dutta,
Michal Valko,
Nicolas Heess,
Alex Bridgland,
Julien Perolat,
Bart De Vylder
, et al. (11 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The rapid progress in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning has opened unprecedented analytics possibilities in various team and individual sports, including baseball, basketball, and tennis. More recently, AI techniques have been applied to football, due to a huge increase in data collection by professional teams, increased computational power, and advances in machine learning, with t…
▽ More
The rapid progress in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning has opened unprecedented analytics possibilities in various team and individual sports, including baseball, basketball, and tennis. More recently, AI techniques have been applied to football, due to a huge increase in data collection by professional teams, increased computational power, and advances in machine learning, with the goal of better addressing new scientific challenges involved in the analysis of both individual players' and coordinated teams' behaviors. The research challenges associated with predictive and prescriptive football analytics require new developments and progress at the intersection of statistical learning, game theory, and computer vision. In this paper, we provide an overarching perspective highlighting how the combination of these fields, in particular, forms a unique microcosm for AI research, while offering mutual benefits for professional teams, spectators, and broadcasters in the years to come. We illustrate that this duality makes football analytics a game changer of tremendous value, in terms of not only changing the game of football itself, but also in terms of what this domain can mean for the field of AI. We review the state-of-the-art and exemplify the types of analysis enabled by combining the aforementioned fields, including illustrative examples of counterfactual analysis using predictive models, and the combination of game-theoretic analysis of penalty kicks with statistical learning of player attributes. We conclude by highlighting envisioned downstream impacts, including possibilities for extensions to other sports (real and virtual).
△ Less
Submitted 18 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
-
The Advantage Regret-Matching Actor-Critic
Authors:
Audrūnas Gruslys,
Marc Lanctot,
Rémi Munos,
Finbarr Timbers,
Martin Schmid,
Julien Perolat,
Dustin Morrill,
Vinicius Zambaldi,
Jean-Baptiste Lespiau,
John Schultz,
Mohammad Gheshlaghi Azar,
Michael Bowling,
Karl Tuyls
Abstract:
Regret minimization has played a key role in online learning, equilibrium computation in games, and reinforcement learning (RL). In this paper, we describe a general model-free RL method for no-regret learning based on repeated reconsideration of past behavior. We propose a model-free RL algorithm, the AdvantageRegret-Matching Actor-Critic (ARMAC): rather than saving past state-action data, ARMAC…
▽ More
Regret minimization has played a key role in online learning, equilibrium computation in games, and reinforcement learning (RL). In this paper, we describe a general model-free RL method for no-regret learning based on repeated reconsideration of past behavior. We propose a model-free RL algorithm, the AdvantageRegret-Matching Actor-Critic (ARMAC): rather than saving past state-action data, ARMAC saves a buffer of past policies, replaying through them to reconstruct hindsight assessments of past behavior. These retrospective value estimates are used to predict conditional advantages which, combined with regret matching, produces a new policy. In particular, ARMAC learns from sampled trajectories in a centralized training setting, without requiring the application of importance sampling commonly used in Monte Carlo counterfactual regret (CFR) minimization; hence, it does not suffer from excessive variance in large environments. In the single-agent setting, ARMAC shows an interesting form of exploration by keeping past policies intact. In the multiagent setting, ARMAC in self-play approaches Nash equilibria on some partially-observable zero-sum benchmarks. We provide exploitability estimates in the significantly larger game of betting-abstracted no-limit Texas Hold'em.
△ Less
Submitted 27 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Fictitious Play for Mean Field Games: Continuous Time Analysis and Applications
Authors:
Sarah Perrin,
Julien Perolat,
Mathieu Laurière,
Matthieu Geist,
Romuald Elie,
Olivier Pietquin
Abstract:
In this paper, we deepen the analysis of continuous time Fictitious Play learning algorithm to the consideration of various finite state Mean Field Game settings (finite horizon, $γ$-discounted), allowing in particular for the introduction of an additional common noise.
We first present a theoretical convergence analysis of the continuous time Fictitious Play process and prove that the induced e…
▽ More
In this paper, we deepen the analysis of continuous time Fictitious Play learning algorithm to the consideration of various finite state Mean Field Game settings (finite horizon, $γ$-discounted), allowing in particular for the introduction of an additional common noise.
We first present a theoretical convergence analysis of the continuous time Fictitious Play process and prove that the induced exploitability decreases at a rate $O(\frac{1}{t})$. Such analysis emphasizes the use of exploitability as a relevant metric for evaluating the convergence towards a Nash equilibrium in the context of Mean Field Games. These theoretical contributions are supported by numerical experiments provided in either model-based or model-free settings. We provide hereby for the first time converging learning dynamics for Mean Field Games in the presence of common noise.
△ Less
Submitted 26 October, 2020; v1 submitted 5 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
Learning to Play No-Press Diplomacy with Best Response Policy Iteration
Authors:
Thomas Anthony,
Tom Eccles,
Andrea Tacchetti,
János Kramár,
Ian Gemp,
Thomas C. Hudson,
Nicolas Porcel,
Marc Lanctot,
Julien Pérolat,
Richard Everett,
Roman Werpachowski,
Satinder Singh,
Thore Graepel,
Yoram Bachrach
Abstract:
Recent advances in deep reinforcement learning (RL) have led to considerable progress in many 2-player zero-sum games, such as Go, Poker and Starcraft. The purely adversarial nature of such games allows for conceptually simple and principled application of RL methods. However real-world settings are many-agent, and agent interactions are complex mixtures of common-interest and competitive aspects.…
▽ More
Recent advances in deep reinforcement learning (RL) have led to considerable progress in many 2-player zero-sum games, such as Go, Poker and Starcraft. The purely adversarial nature of such games allows for conceptually simple and principled application of RL methods. However real-world settings are many-agent, and agent interactions are complex mixtures of common-interest and competitive aspects. We consider Diplomacy, a 7-player board game designed to accentuate dilemmas resulting from many-agent interactions. It also features a large combinatorial action space and simultaneous moves, which are challenging for RL algorithms. We propose a simple yet effective approximate best response operator, designed to handle large combinatorial action spaces and simultaneous moves. We also introduce a family of policy iteration methods that approximate fictitious play. With these methods, we successfully apply RL to Diplomacy: we show that our agents convincingly outperform the previous state-of-the-art, and game theoretic equilibrium analysis shows that the new process yields consistent improvements.
△ Less
Submitted 4 January, 2022; v1 submitted 8 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Navigating the Landscape of Multiplayer Games
Authors:
Shayegan Omidshafiei,
Karl Tuyls,
Wojciech M. Czarnecki,
Francisco C. Santos,
Mark Rowland,
Jerome Connor,
Daniel Hennes,
Paul Muller,
Julien Perolat,
Bart De Vylder,
Audrunas Gruslys,
Remi Munos
Abstract:
Multiplayer games have long been used as testbeds in artificial intelligence research, aptly referred to as the Drosophila of artificial intelligence. Traditionally, researchers have focused on using well-known games to build strong agents. This progress, however, can be better informed by characterizing games and their topological landscape. Tackling this latter question can facilitate understand…
▽ More
Multiplayer games have long been used as testbeds in artificial intelligence research, aptly referred to as the Drosophila of artificial intelligence. Traditionally, researchers have focused on using well-known games to build strong agents. This progress, however, can be better informed by characterizing games and their topological landscape. Tackling this latter question can facilitate understanding of agents and help determine what game an agent should target next as part of its training. Here, we show how network measures applied to response graphs of large-scale games enable the creation of a landscape of games, quantifying relationships between games of varying sizes and characteristics. We illustrate our findings in domains ranging from canonical games to complex empirical games capturing the performance of trained agents pitted against one another. Our results culminate in a demonstration leveraging this information to generate new and interesting games, including mixtures of empirical games synthesized from real world games.
△ Less
Submitted 17 November, 2020; v1 submitted 4 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
From Poincaré Recurrence to Convergence in Imperfect Information Games: Finding Equilibrium via Regularization
Authors:
Julien Perolat,
Remi Munos,
Jean-Baptiste Lespiau,
Shayegan Omidshafiei,
Mark Rowland,
Pedro Ortega,
Neil Burch,
Thomas Anthony,
David Balduzzi,
Bart De Vylder,
Georgios Piliouras,
Marc Lanctot,
Karl Tuyls
Abstract:
In this paper we investigate the Follow the Regularized Leader dynamics in sequential imperfect information games (IIG). We generalize existing results of Poincaré recurrence from normal-form games to zero-sum two-player imperfect information games and other sequential game settings. We then investigate how adapting the reward (by adding a regularization term) of the game can give strong convergen…
▽ More
In this paper we investigate the Follow the Regularized Leader dynamics in sequential imperfect information games (IIG). We generalize existing results of Poincaré recurrence from normal-form games to zero-sum two-player imperfect information games and other sequential game settings. We then investigate how adapting the reward (by adding a regularization term) of the game can give strong convergence guarantees in monotone games. We continue by showing how this reward adaptation technique can be leveraged to build algorithms that converge exactly to the Nash equilibrium. Finally, we show how these insights can be directly used to build state-of-the-art model-free algorithms for zero-sum two-player Imperfect Information Games (IIG).
△ Less
Submitted 19 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
-
A Generalized Training Approach for Multiagent Learning
Authors:
Paul Muller,
Shayegan Omidshafiei,
Mark Rowland,
Karl Tuyls,
Julien Perolat,
Siqi Liu,
Daniel Hennes,
Luke Marris,
Marc Lanctot,
Edward Hughes,
Zhe Wang,
Guy Lever,
Nicolas Heess,
Thore Graepel,
Remi Munos
Abstract:
This paper investigates a population-based training regime based on game-theoretic principles called Policy-Spaced Response Oracles (PSRO). PSRO is general in the sense that it (1) encompasses well-known algorithms such as fictitious play and double oracle as special cases, and (2) in principle applies to general-sum, many-player games. Despite this, prior studies of PSRO have been focused on two-…
▽ More
This paper investigates a population-based training regime based on game-theoretic principles called Policy-Spaced Response Oracles (PSRO). PSRO is general in the sense that it (1) encompasses well-known algorithms such as fictitious play and double oracle as special cases, and (2) in principle applies to general-sum, many-player games. Despite this, prior studies of PSRO have been focused on two-player zero-sum games, a regime wherein Nash equilibria are tractably computable. In moving from two-player zero-sum games to more general settings, computation of Nash equilibria quickly becomes infeasible. Here, we extend the theoretical underpinnings of PSRO by considering an alternative solution concept, $α$-Rank, which is unique (thus faces no equilibrium selection issues, unlike Nash) and applies readily to general-sum, many-player settings. We establish convergence guarantees in several games classes, and identify links between Nash equilibria and $α$-Rank. We demonstrate the competitive performance of $α$-Rank-based PSRO against an exact Nash solver-based PSRO in 2-player Kuhn and Leduc Poker. We then go beyond the reach of prior PSRO applications by considering 3- to 5-player poker games, yielding instances where $α$-Rank achieves faster convergence than approximate Nash solvers, thus establishing it as a favorable general games solver. We also carry out an initial empirical validation in MuJoCo soccer, illustrating the feasibility of the proposed approach in another complex domain.
△ Less
Submitted 14 February, 2020; v1 submitted 27 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
-
Multiagent Evaluation under Incomplete Information
Authors:
Mark Rowland,
Shayegan Omidshafiei,
Karl Tuyls,
Julien Perolat,
Michal Valko,
Georgios Piliouras,
Remi Munos
Abstract:
This paper investigates the evaluation of learned multiagent strategies in the incomplete information setting, which plays a critical role in ranking and training of agents. Traditionally, researchers have relied on Elo ratings for this purpose, with recent works also using methods based on Nash equilibria. Unfortunately, Elo is unable to handle intransitive agent interactions, and other technique…
▽ More
This paper investigates the evaluation of learned multiagent strategies in the incomplete information setting, which plays a critical role in ranking and training of agents. Traditionally, researchers have relied on Elo ratings for this purpose, with recent works also using methods based on Nash equilibria. Unfortunately, Elo is unable to handle intransitive agent interactions, and other techniques are restricted to zero-sum, two-player settings or are limited by the fact that the Nash equilibrium is intractable to compute. Recently, a ranking method called α-Rank, relying on a new graph-based game-theoretic solution concept, was shown to tractably apply to general games. However, evaluations based on Elo or α-Rank typically assume noise-free game outcomes, despite the data often being collected from noisy simulations, making this assumption unrealistic in practice. This paper investigates multiagent evaluation in the incomplete information regime, involving general-sum many-player games with noisy outcomes. We derive sample complexity guarantees required to confidently rank agents in this setting. We propose adaptive algorithms for accurate ranking, provide correctness and sample complexity guarantees, then introduce a means of connecting uncertainties in noisy match outcomes to uncertainties in rankings. We evaluate the performance of these approaches in several domains, including Bernoulli games, a soccer meta-game, and Kuhn poker.
△ Less
Submitted 10 January, 2020; v1 submitted 21 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
-
OpenSpiel: A Framework for Reinforcement Learning in Games
Authors:
Marc Lanctot,
Edward Lockhart,
Jean-Baptiste Lespiau,
Vinicius Zambaldi,
Satyaki Upadhyay,
Julien Pérolat,
Sriram Srinivasan,
Finbarr Timbers,
Karl Tuyls,
Shayegan Omidshafiei,
Daniel Hennes,
Dustin Morrill,
Paul Muller,
Timo Ewalds,
Ryan Faulkner,
János Kramár,
Bart De Vylder,
Brennan Saeta,
James Bradbury,
David Ding,
Sebastian Borgeaud,
Matthew Lai,
Julian Schrittwieser,
Thomas Anthony,
Edward Hughes
, et al. (2 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
OpenSpiel is a collection of environments and algorithms for research in general reinforcement learning and search/planning in games. OpenSpiel supports n-player (single- and multi- agent) zero-sum, cooperative and general-sum, one-shot and sequential, strictly turn-taking and simultaneous-move, perfect and imperfect information games, as well as traditional multiagent environments such as (partia…
▽ More
OpenSpiel is a collection of environments and algorithms for research in general reinforcement learning and search/planning in games. OpenSpiel supports n-player (single- and multi- agent) zero-sum, cooperative and general-sum, one-shot and sequential, strictly turn-taking and simultaneous-move, perfect and imperfect information games, as well as traditional multiagent environments such as (partially- and fully- observable) grid worlds and social dilemmas. OpenSpiel also includes tools to analyze learning dynamics and other common evaluation metrics. This document serves both as an overview of the code base and an introduction to the terminology, core concepts, and algorithms across the fields of reinforcement learning, computational game theory, and search.
△ Less
Submitted 26 September, 2020; v1 submitted 25 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
-
On the Convergence of Model Free Learning in Mean Field Games
Authors:
Romuald Elie,
Julien Pérolat,
Mathieu Laurière,
Matthieu Geist,
Olivier Pietquin
Abstract:
Learning by experience in Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) is a difficult and exciting task, due to the lack of stationarity of the environment, whose dynamics evolves as the population learns. In order to design scalable algorithms for systems with a large population of interacting agents (e.g. swarms), this paper focuses on Mean Field MAS, where the number of agents is asymptotically infinite. Recently…
▽ More
Learning by experience in Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) is a difficult and exciting task, due to the lack of stationarity of the environment, whose dynamics evolves as the population learns. In order to design scalable algorithms for systems with a large population of interacting agents (e.g. swarms), this paper focuses on Mean Field MAS, where the number of agents is asymptotically infinite. Recently, a very active burgeoning field studies the effects of diverse reinforcement learning algorithms for agents with no prior information on a stationary Mean Field Game (MFG) and learn their policy through repeated experience. We adopt a high perspective on this problem and analyze in full generality the convergence of a fictitious iterative scheme using any single agent learning algorithm at each step. We quantify the quality of the computed approximate Nash equilibrium, in terms of the accumulated errors arising at each learning iteration step. Notably, we show for the first time convergence of model free learning algorithms towards non-stationary MFG equilibria, relying only on classical assumptions on the MFG dynamics. We illustrate our theoretical results with a numerical experiment in a continuous action-space environment, where the approximate best response of the iterative fictitious play scheme is computed with a deep RL algorithm.
△ Less
Submitted 20 February, 2020; v1 submitted 4 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
-
Foolproof Cooperative Learning
Authors:
Alexis Jacq,
Julien Perolat,
Matthieu Geist,
Olivier Pietquin
Abstract:
This paper extends the notion of learning equilibrium in game theory from matrix games to stochastic games. We introduce Foolproof Cooperative Learning (FCL), an algorithm that converges to a Tit-for-Tat behavior. It allows cooperative strategies when played against itself while being not exploitable by selfish players. We prove that in repeated symmetric games, this algorithm is a learning equili…
▽ More
This paper extends the notion of learning equilibrium in game theory from matrix games to stochastic games. We introduce Foolproof Cooperative Learning (FCL), an algorithm that converges to a Tit-for-Tat behavior. It allows cooperative strategies when played against itself while being not exploitable by selfish players. We prove that in repeated symmetric games, this algorithm is a learning equilibrium. We illustrate the behavior of FCL on symmetric matrix and grid games, and its robustness to selfish learners.
△ Less
Submitted 15 October, 2020; v1 submitted 24 June, 2019;
originally announced June 2019.
-
Neural Replicator Dynamics
Authors:
Daniel Hennes,
Dustin Morrill,
Shayegan Omidshafiei,
Remi Munos,
Julien Perolat,
Marc Lanctot,
Audrunas Gruslys,
Jean-Baptiste Lespiau,
Paavo Parmas,
Edgar Duenez-Guzman,
Karl Tuyls
Abstract:
Policy gradient and actor-critic algorithms form the basis of many commonly used training techniques in deep reinforcement learning. Using these algorithms in multiagent environments poses problems such as nonstationarity and instability. In this paper, we first demonstrate that standard softmax-based policy gradient can be prone to poor performance in the presence of even the most benign nonstati…
▽ More
Policy gradient and actor-critic algorithms form the basis of many commonly used training techniques in deep reinforcement learning. Using these algorithms in multiagent environments poses problems such as nonstationarity and instability. In this paper, we first demonstrate that standard softmax-based policy gradient can be prone to poor performance in the presence of even the most benign nonstationarity. By contrast, it is known that the replicator dynamics, a well-studied model from evolutionary game theory, eliminates dominated strategies and exhibits convergence of the time-averaged trajectories to interior Nash equilibria in zero-sum games. Thus, using the replicator dynamics as a foundation, we derive an elegant one-line change to policy gradient methods that simply bypasses the gradient step through the softmax, yielding a new algorithm titled Neural Replicator Dynamics (NeuRD). NeuRD reduces to the exponential weights/Hedge algorithm in the single-state all-actions case. Additionally, NeuRD has formal equivalence to softmax counterfactual regret minimization, which guarantees convergence in the sequential tabular case. Importantly, our algorithm provides a straightforward way of extending the replicator dynamics to the function approximation setting. Empirical results show that NeuRD quickly adapts to nonstationarities, outperforming policy gradient significantly in both tabular and function approximation settings, when evaluated on the standard imperfect information benchmarks of Kuhn Poker, Leduc Poker, and Goofspiel.
△ Less
Submitted 26 February, 2020; v1 submitted 1 June, 2019;
originally announced June 2019.
-
Computing Approximate Equilibria in Sequential Adversarial Games by Exploitability Descent
Authors:
Edward Lockhart,
Marc Lanctot,
Julien Pérolat,
Jean-Baptiste Lespiau,
Dustin Morrill,
Finbarr Timbers,
Karl Tuyls
Abstract:
In this paper, we present exploitability descent, a new algorithm to compute approximate equilibria in two-player zero-sum extensive-form games with imperfect information, by direct policy optimization against worst-case opponents. We prove that when following this optimization, the exploitability of a player's strategy converges asymptotically to zero, and hence when both players employ this opti…
▽ More
In this paper, we present exploitability descent, a new algorithm to compute approximate equilibria in two-player zero-sum extensive-form games with imperfect information, by direct policy optimization against worst-case opponents. We prove that when following this optimization, the exploitability of a player's strategy converges asymptotically to zero, and hence when both players employ this optimization, the joint policies converge to a Nash equilibrium. Unlike fictitious play (XFP) and counterfactual regret minimization (CFR), our convergence result pertains to the policies being optimized rather than the average policies. Our experiments demonstrate convergence rates comparable to XFP and CFR in four benchmark games in the tabular case. Using function approximation, we find that our algorithm outperforms the tabular version in two of the games, which, to the best of our knowledge, is the first such result in imperfect information games among this class of algorithms.
△ Less
Submitted 12 June, 2020; v1 submitted 13 March, 2019;
originally announced March 2019.
-
$α$-Rank: Multi-Agent Evaluation by Evolution
Authors:
Shayegan Omidshafiei,
Christos Papadimitriou,
Georgios Piliouras,
Karl Tuyls,
Mark Rowland,
Jean-Baptiste Lespiau,
Wojciech M. Czarnecki,
Marc Lanctot,
Julien Perolat,
Remi Munos
Abstract:
We introduce $α$-Rank, a principled evolutionary dynamics methodology for the evaluation and ranking of agents in large-scale multi-agent interactions, grounded in a novel dynamical game-theoretic solution concept called Markov-Conley chains (MCCs). The approach leverages continuous- and discrete-time evolutionary dynamical systems applied to empirical games, and scales tractably in the number of…
▽ More
We introduce $α$-Rank, a principled evolutionary dynamics methodology for the evaluation and ranking of agents in large-scale multi-agent interactions, grounded in a novel dynamical game-theoretic solution concept called Markov-Conley chains (MCCs). The approach leverages continuous- and discrete-time evolutionary dynamical systems applied to empirical games, and scales tractably in the number of agents, the type of interactions, and the type of empirical games (symmetric and asymmetric). Current models are fundamentally limited in one or more of these dimensions and are not guaranteed to converge to the desired game-theoretic solution concept (typically the Nash equilibrium). $α$-Rank provides a ranking over the set of agents under evaluation and provides insights into their strengths, weaknesses, and long-term dynamics. This is a consequence of the links we establish to the MCC solution concept when the underlying evolutionary model's ranking-intensity parameter, $α$, is chosen to be large, which exactly forms the basis of $α$-Rank. In contrast to the Nash equilibrium, which is a static concept based on fixed points, MCCs are a dynamical solution concept based on the Markov chain formalism, Conley's Fundamental Theorem of Dynamical Systems, and the core ingredients of dynamical systems: fixed points, recurrent sets, periodic orbits, and limit cycles. $α$-Rank runs in polynomial time with respect to the total number of pure strategy profiles, whereas computing a Nash equilibrium for a general-sum game is known to be intractable. We introduce proofs that not only provide a unifying perspective of existing continuous- and discrete-time evolutionary evaluation models, but also reveal the formal underpinnings of the $α$-Rank methodology. We empirically validate the method in several domains including AlphaGo, AlphaZero, MuJoCo Soccer, and Poker.
△ Less
Submitted 4 October, 2019; v1 submitted 4 March, 2019;
originally announced March 2019.
-
Open-ended Learning in Symmetric Zero-sum Games
Authors:
David Balduzzi,
Marta Garnelo,
Yoram Bachrach,
Wojciech M. Czarnecki,
Julien Perolat,
Max Jaderberg,
Thore Graepel
Abstract:
Zero-sum games such as chess and poker are, abstractly, functions that evaluate pairs of agents, for example labeling them `winner' and `loser'. If the game is approximately transitive, then self-play generates sequences of agents of increasing strength. However, nontransitive games, such as rock-paper-scissors, can exhibit strategic cycles, and there is no longer a clear objective -- we want agen…
▽ More
Zero-sum games such as chess and poker are, abstractly, functions that evaluate pairs of agents, for example labeling them `winner' and `loser'. If the game is approximately transitive, then self-play generates sequences of agents of increasing strength. However, nontransitive games, such as rock-paper-scissors, can exhibit strategic cycles, and there is no longer a clear objective -- we want agents to increase in strength, but against whom is unclear. In this paper, we introduce a geometric framework for formulating agent objectives in zero-sum games, in order to construct adaptive sequences of objectives that yield open-ended learning. The framework allows us to reason about population performance in nontransitive games, and enables the development of a new algorithm (rectified Nash response, PSRO_rN) that uses game-theoretic niching to construct diverse populations of effective agents, producing a stronger set of agents than existing algorithms. We apply PSRO_rN to two highly nontransitive resource allocation games and find that PSRO_rN consistently outperforms the existing alternatives.
△ Less
Submitted 13 May, 2019; v1 submitted 23 January, 2019;
originally announced January 2019.
-
Malthusian Reinforcement Learning
Authors:
Joel Z. Leibo,
Julien Perolat,
Edward Hughes,
Steven Wheelwright,
Adam H. Marblestone,
Edgar Duéñez-Guzmán,
Peter Sunehag,
Iain Dunning,
Thore Graepel
Abstract:
Here we explore a new algorithmic framework for multi-agent reinforcement learning, called Malthusian reinforcement learning, which extends self-play to include fitness-linked population size dynamics that drive ongoing innovation. In Malthusian RL, increases in a subpopulation's average return drive subsequent increases in its size, just as Thomas Malthus argued in 1798 was the relationship betwe…
▽ More
Here we explore a new algorithmic framework for multi-agent reinforcement learning, called Malthusian reinforcement learning, which extends self-play to include fitness-linked population size dynamics that drive ongoing innovation. In Malthusian RL, increases in a subpopulation's average return drive subsequent increases in its size, just as Thomas Malthus argued in 1798 was the relationship between preindustrial income levels and population growth. Malthusian reinforcement learning harnesses the competitive pressures arising from growing and shrinking population size to drive agents to explore regions of state and policy spaces that they could not otherwise reach. Furthermore, in environments where there are potential gains from specialization and division of labor, we show that Malthusian reinforcement learning is better positioned to take advantage of such synergies than algorithms based on self-play.
△ Less
Submitted 3 March, 2019; v1 submitted 17 December, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.
-
Actor-Critic Policy Optimization in Partially Observable Multiagent Environments
Authors:
Sriram Srinivasan,
Marc Lanctot,
Vinicius Zambaldi,
Julien Perolat,
Karl Tuyls,
Remi Munos,
Michael Bowling
Abstract:
Optimization of parameterized policies for reinforcement learning (RL) is an important and challenging problem in artificial intelligence. Among the most common approaches are algorithms based on gradient ascent of a score function representing discounted return. In this paper, we examine the role of these policy gradient and actor-critic algorithms in partially-observable multiagent environments.…
▽ More
Optimization of parameterized policies for reinforcement learning (RL) is an important and challenging problem in artificial intelligence. Among the most common approaches are algorithms based on gradient ascent of a score function representing discounted return. In this paper, we examine the role of these policy gradient and actor-critic algorithms in partially-observable multiagent environments. We show several candidate policy update rules and relate them to a foundation of regret minimization and multiagent learning techniques for the one-shot and tabular cases, leading to previously unknown convergence guarantees. We apply our method to model-free multiagent reinforcement learning in adversarial sequential decision problems (zero-sum imperfect information games), using RL-style function approximation. We evaluate on commonly used benchmark Poker domains, showing performance against fixed policies and empirical convergence to approximate Nash equilibria in self-play with rates similar to or better than a baseline model-free algorithm for zero sum games, without any domain-specific state space reductions.
△ Less
Submitted 12 June, 2020; v1 submitted 21 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
-
Playing the Game of Universal Adversarial Perturbations
Authors:
Julien Perolat,
Mateusz Malinowski,
Bilal Piot,
Olivier Pietquin
Abstract:
We study the problem of learning classifiers robust to universal adversarial perturbations. While prior work approaches this problem via robust optimization, adversarial training, or input transformation, we instead phrase it as a two-player zero-sum game. In this new formulation, both players simultaneously play the same game, where one player chooses a classifier that minimizes a classification…
▽ More
We study the problem of learning classifiers robust to universal adversarial perturbations. While prior work approaches this problem via robust optimization, adversarial training, or input transformation, we instead phrase it as a two-player zero-sum game. In this new formulation, both players simultaneously play the same game, where one player chooses a classifier that minimizes a classification loss whilst the other player creates an adversarial perturbation that increases the same loss when applied to every sample in the training set. By observing that performing a classification (respectively creating adversarial samples) is the best response to the other player, we propose a novel extension of a game-theoretic algorithm, namely fictitious play, to the domain of training robust classifiers. Finally, we empirically show the robustness and versatility of our approach in two defence scenarios where universal attacks are performed on several image classification datasets -- CIFAR10, CIFAR100 and ImageNet.
△ Less
Submitted 25 September, 2018; v1 submitted 20 September, 2018;
originally announced September 2018.
-
Re-evaluating Evaluation
Authors:
David Balduzzi,
Karl Tuyls,
Julien Perolat,
Thore Graepel
Abstract:
Progress in machine learning is measured by careful evaluation on problems of outstanding common interest. However, the proliferation of benchmark suites and environments, adversarial attacks, and other complications has diluted the basic evaluation model by overwhelming researchers with choices. Deliberate or accidental cherry picking is increasingly likely, and designing well-balanced evaluation…
▽ More
Progress in machine learning is measured by careful evaluation on problems of outstanding common interest. However, the proliferation of benchmark suites and environments, adversarial attacks, and other complications has diluted the basic evaluation model by overwhelming researchers with choices. Deliberate or accidental cherry picking is increasingly likely, and designing well-balanced evaluation suites requires increasing effort. In this paper we take a step back and propose Nash averaging. The approach builds on a detailed analysis of the algebraic structure of evaluation in two basic scenarios: agent-vs-agent and agent-vs-task. The key strength of Nash averaging is that it automatically adapts to redundancies in evaluation data, so that results are not biased by the incorporation of easy tasks or weak agents. Nash averaging thus encourages maximally inclusive evaluation -- since there is no harm (computational cost aside) from including all available tasks and agents.
△ Less
Submitted 30 October, 2018; v1 submitted 7 June, 2018;
originally announced June 2018.
-
A Generalised Method for Empirical Game Theoretic Analysis
Authors:
Karl Tuyls,
Julien Perolat,
Marc Lanctot,
Joel Z Leibo,
Thore Graepel
Abstract:
This paper provides theoretical bounds for empirical game theoretical analysis of complex multi-agent interactions. We provide insights in the empirical meta game showing that a Nash equilibrium of the meta-game is an approximate Nash equilibrium of the true underlying game. We investigate and show how many data samples are required to obtain a close enough approximation of the underlying game. Ad…
▽ More
This paper provides theoretical bounds for empirical game theoretical analysis of complex multi-agent interactions. We provide insights in the empirical meta game showing that a Nash equilibrium of the meta-game is an approximate Nash equilibrium of the true underlying game. We investigate and show how many data samples are required to obtain a close enough approximation of the underlying game. Additionally, we extend the meta-game analysis methodology to asymmetric games. The state-of-the-art has only considered empirical games in which agents have access to the same strategy sets and the payoff structure is symmetric, implying that agents are interchangeable. Finally, we carry out an empirical illustration of the generalised method in several domains, illustrating the theory and evolutionary dynamics of several versions of the AlphaGo algorithm (symmetric), the dynamics of the Colonel Blotto game played by human players on Facebook (symmetric), and an example of a meta-game in Leduc Poker (asymmetric), generated by the PSRO multi-agent learning algorithm.
△ Less
Submitted 16 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
-
Symmetric Decomposition of Asymmetric Games
Authors:
Karl Tuyls,
Julien Perolat,
Marc Lanctot,
Georg Ostrovski,
Rahul Savani,
Joel Leibo,
Toby Ord,
Thore Graepel,
Shane Legg
Abstract:
We introduce new theoretical insights into two-population asymmetric games allowing for an elegant symmetric decomposition into two single population symmetric games. Specifically, we show how an asymmetric bimatrix game (A,B) can be decomposed into its symmetric counterparts by envisioning and investigating the payoff tables (A and B) that constitute the asymmetric game, as two independent, singl…
▽ More
We introduce new theoretical insights into two-population asymmetric games allowing for an elegant symmetric decomposition into two single population symmetric games. Specifically, we show how an asymmetric bimatrix game (A,B) can be decomposed into its symmetric counterparts by envisioning and investigating the payoff tables (A and B) that constitute the asymmetric game, as two independent, single population, symmetric games. We reveal several surprising formal relationships between an asymmetric two-population game and its symmetric single population counterparts, which facilitate a convenient analysis of the original asymmetric game due to the dimensionality reduction of the decomposition. The main finding reveals that if (x,y) is a Nash equilibrium of an asymmetric game (A,B), this implies that y is a Nash equilibrium of the symmetric counterpart game determined by payoff table A, and x is a Nash equilibrium of the symmetric counterpart game determined by payoff table B. Also the reverse holds and combinations of Nash equilibria of the counterpart games form Nash equilibria of the asymmetric game. We illustrate how these formal relationships aid in identifying and analysing the Nash structure of asymmetric games, by examining the evolutionary dynamics of the simpler counterpart games in several canonical examples.
△ Less
Submitted 17 January, 2018; v1 submitted 14 November, 2017;
originally announced November 2017.
-
A Unified Game-Theoretic Approach to Multiagent Reinforcement Learning
Authors:
Marc Lanctot,
Vinicius Zambaldi,
Audrunas Gruslys,
Angeliki Lazaridou,
Karl Tuyls,
Julien Perolat,
David Silver,
Thore Graepel
Abstract:
To achieve general intelligence, agents must learn how to interact with others in a shared environment: this is the challenge of multiagent reinforcement learning (MARL). The simplest form is independent reinforcement learning (InRL), where each agent treats its experience as part of its (non-stationary) environment. In this paper, we first observe that policies learned using InRL can overfit to t…
▽ More
To achieve general intelligence, agents must learn how to interact with others in a shared environment: this is the challenge of multiagent reinforcement learning (MARL). The simplest form is independent reinforcement learning (InRL), where each agent treats its experience as part of its (non-stationary) environment. In this paper, we first observe that policies learned using InRL can overfit to the other agents' policies during training, failing to sufficiently generalize during execution. We introduce a new metric, joint-policy correlation, to quantify this effect. We describe an algorithm for general MARL, based on approximate best responses to mixtures of policies generated using deep reinforcement learning, and empirical game-theoretic analysis to compute meta-strategies for policy selection. The algorithm generalizes previous ones such as InRL, iterated best response, double oracle, and fictitious play. Then, we present a scalable implementation which reduces the memory requirement using decoupled meta-solvers. Finally, we demonstrate the generality of the resulting policies in two partially observable settings: gridworld coordination games and poker.
△ Less
Submitted 7 November, 2017; v1 submitted 2 November, 2017;
originally announced November 2017.
-
A multi-agent reinforcement learning model of common-pool resource appropriation
Authors:
Julien Perolat,
Joel Z. Leibo,
Vinicius Zambaldi,
Charles Beattie,
Karl Tuyls,
Thore Graepel
Abstract:
Humanity faces numerous problems of common-pool resource appropriation. This class of multi-agent social dilemma includes the problems of ensuring sustainable use of fresh water, common fisheries, grazing pastures, and irrigation systems. Abstract models of common-pool resource appropriation based on non-cooperative game theory predict that self-interested agents will generally fail to find social…
▽ More
Humanity faces numerous problems of common-pool resource appropriation. This class of multi-agent social dilemma includes the problems of ensuring sustainable use of fresh water, common fisheries, grazing pastures, and irrigation systems. Abstract models of common-pool resource appropriation based on non-cooperative game theory predict that self-interested agents will generally fail to find socially positive equilibria---a phenomenon called the tragedy of the commons. However, in reality, human societies are sometimes able to discover and implement stable cooperative solutions. Decades of behavioral game theory research have sought to uncover aspects of human behavior that make this possible. Most of that work was based on laboratory experiments where participants only make a single choice: how much to appropriate. Recognizing the importance of spatial and temporal resource dynamics, a recent trend has been toward experiments in more complex real-time video game-like environments. However, standard methods of non-cooperative game theory can no longer be used to generate predictions for this case. Here we show that deep reinforcement learning can be used instead. To that end, we study the emergent behavior of groups of independently learning agents in a partially observed Markov game modeling common-pool resource appropriation. Our experiments highlight the importance of trial-and-error learning in common-pool resource appropriation and shed light on the relationship between exclusion, sustainability, and inequality.
△ Less
Submitted 6 September, 2017; v1 submitted 20 July, 2017;
originally announced July 2017.
-
Learning Nash Equilibrium for General-Sum Markov Games from Batch Data
Authors:
Julien Pérolat,
Florian Strub,
Bilal Piot,
Olivier Pietquin
Abstract:
This paper addresses the problem of learning a Nash equilibrium in $γ$-discounted multiplayer general-sum Markov Games (MG). A key component of this model is the possibility for the players to either collaborate or team apart to increase their rewards. Building an artificial player for general-sum MGs implies to learn more complex strategies which are impossible to obtain by using techniques devel…
▽ More
This paper addresses the problem of learning a Nash equilibrium in $γ$-discounted multiplayer general-sum Markov Games (MG). A key component of this model is the possibility for the players to either collaborate or team apart to increase their rewards. Building an artificial player for general-sum MGs implies to learn more complex strategies which are impossible to obtain by using techniques developed for two-player zero-sum MGs. In this paper, we introduce a new definition of $ε$-Nash equilibrium in MGs which grasps the strategy's quality for multiplayer games. We prove that minimizing the norm of two Bellman-like residuals implies the convergence to such an $ε$-Nash equilibrium. Then, we show that minimizing an empirical estimate of the $L_p$ norm of these Bellman-like residuals allows learning for general-sum games within the batch setting. Finally, we introduce a neural network architecture named NashNetwork that successfully learns a Nash equilibrium in a generic multiplayer general-sum turn-based MG.
△ Less
Submitted 6 March, 2017; v1 submitted 28 June, 2016;
originally announced June 2016.