Supernova Pointing Capabilities of DUNE
Authors:
DUNE Collaboration,
A. Abed Abud,
B. Abi,
R. Acciarri,
M. A. Acero,
M. R. Adames,
G. Adamov,
M. Adamowski,
D. Adams,
M. Adinolfi,
C. Adriano,
A. Aduszkiewicz,
J. Aguilar,
B. Aimard,
F. Akbar,
K. Allison,
S. Alonso Monsalve,
M. Alrashed,
A. Alton,
R. Alvarez,
T. Alves,
H. Amar,
P. Amedo,
J. Anderson,
D. A. Andrade
, et al. (1340 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The determination of the direction of a stellar core collapse via its neutrino emission is crucial for the identification of the progenitor for a multimessenger follow-up. A highly effective method of reconstructing supernova directions within the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE) is introduced. The supernova neutrino pointing resolution is studied by simulating and reconstructing electr…
▽ More
The determination of the direction of a stellar core collapse via its neutrino emission is crucial for the identification of the progenitor for a multimessenger follow-up. A highly effective method of reconstructing supernova directions within the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE) is introduced. The supernova neutrino pointing resolution is studied by simulating and reconstructing electron-neutrino charged-current absorption on $^{40}$Ar and elastic scattering of neutrinos on electrons. Procedures to reconstruct individual interactions, including a newly developed technique called ``brems flipping'', as well as the burst direction from an ensemble of interactions are described. Performance of the burst direction reconstruction is evaluated for supernovae happening at a distance of 10 kpc for a specific supernova burst flux model. The pointing resolution is found to be 3.4 degrees at 68% coverage for a perfect interaction-channel classification and a fiducial mass of 40 kton, and 6.6 degrees for a 10 kton fiducial mass respectively. Assuming a 4% rate of charged-current interactions being misidentified as elastic scattering, DUNE's burst pointing resolution is found to be 4.3 degrees (8.7 degrees) at 68% coverage.
△ Less
Submitted 14 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
Discovery prospects of dwarf spheroidal galaxies for indirect dark matter searches
Authors:
Shin'ichiro Ando,
Bradley J. Kavanagh,
Oscar Macias,
Tiago Alves,
Siebren Broersen,
Stijn Delnoij,
Thomas Goldman,
Jim Groefsema,
Jorinde Kleverlaan,
Jaïr Lenssen,
Toon Muskens,
Liam X. Palma Visser,
Ebo Peerbooms,
Bram van der Linden,
Sill Verberne
Abstract:
We study the prospects for the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) to find new dwarf spheroidal galaxies in the Milky Way. Adopting models of Milky-Way halo substructure and phenomenological prescriptions connecting subhalos and satellite galaxies, we obtain surface brightness distributions of $V$-band magnitude that lead us to predict that LSST will discover tens to hundreds of dwarf spheroida…
▽ More
We study the prospects for the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) to find new dwarf spheroidal galaxies in the Milky Way. Adopting models of Milky-Way halo substructure and phenomenological prescriptions connecting subhalos and satellite galaxies, we obtain surface brightness distributions of $V$-band magnitude that lead us to predict that LSST will discover tens to hundreds of dwarf spheroidal galaxies above its sensitivity. The soon-to-be-discovered dwarfs will be interesting targets for indirect searches of dark matter annihilation yields. We forecast the distribution function of gamma-ray emission from dark matter annihilation in these objects, and discuss the detectability of these signals at both Fermi Large Area Telescope (LAT) and Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA). By combining information from the predicted dwarf galaxies, we obtain an expected sensitivity to the annihilation cross section $\langle σv \rangle$ of $10^{-26}$ cm$^3$ s$^{-1}$ (for dark matter particles of mass 10 GeV with Fermi-LAT) and $5\times 10^{-24}$ cm$^3$ s$^{-1}$ (for dark matter particles of mass 500 GeV with CTA). We find that the current uncertainties in the mass measurement of the Milky-Way halo are relatively minor compared with the Poisson errors associated to drawing the most promising dwarfs from the underlying flux distribution.
△ Less
Submitted 14 October, 2019; v1 submitted 17 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.
