-
Calibration of detector time constant with a thermal source for the POLARBEAR-2A CMB polarization experiment
Authors:
S. Takatori,
M. Hasegawa,
M. Hazumi,
D. Kaneko,
N. Katayama,
A. T. Lee,
S. Takakura,
T. Tomaru,
T. Adkins,
D. Barron,
Y. Chinone,
K. T. Crowley,
T. de Haan,
T. Elleflot,
N. Farias,
C. Feng,
T. Fujino,
J. C. Groh,
H. Hirose,
F. Matsuda,
H. Nishino,
Y. Segawa,
P. Siritanasak,
A. Suzuki,
K. Yamada
Abstract:
The Simons Array (SA) project is a ground-based Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) polarization experiment. The SA observes the sky using three telescopes, and POLARBEAR-2A (PB-2A) is the receiver system on the first telescope. For the ground-based experiment, atmospheric fluctuation is the primary noise source that could cause polarization leakage. In the PB-2A receiver system, a continuously rota…
▽ More
The Simons Array (SA) project is a ground-based Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) polarization experiment. The SA observes the sky using three telescopes, and POLARBEAR-2A (PB-2A) is the receiver system on the first telescope. For the ground-based experiment, atmospheric fluctuation is the primary noise source that could cause polarization leakage. In the PB-2A receiver system, a continuously rotating half-wave plate (HWP) is used to mitigate the polarization leakage. However, due to the rapid modulation of the polarization signal, the uncertainty in the time constant of the detector results in an uncertainty in the polarization angle. For PB-2A, the time constant of each bolometer needs to be calibrated at the sub-millisecond level to avoid introducing bias to the polarization signal. We have developed a new calibrator system that can be used to calibrate the time constants of the detectors. In this study, we present the design of the calibration system and the preliminary results of the time constant calibration for PB-2A.
△ Less
Submitted 25 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Improved upper limit on degree-scale CMB B-mode polarization power from the 670 square-degree POLARBEAR survey
Authors:
The POLARBEAR Collaboration,
S. Adachi,
T. Adkins,
M. A. O. Aguilar Faúndez,
K. S. Arnold,
C. Baccigalupi,
D. Barron,
S. Chapman,
K. Cheung,
Y. Chinone,
K. T. Crowley,
T. Elleflot,
J. Errard,
G. Fabbian,
C. Feng,
T. Fujino,
N. Galitzki,
N. W. Halverson,
M. Hasegawa,
M. Hazumi,
H. Hirose,
L. Howe,
J. Ito,
O. Jeong,
D. Kaneko
, et al. (29 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We report an improved measurement of the degree-scale cosmic microwave background $B$-mode angular-power spectrum over 670 square-degree sky area at 150 GHz with POLARBEAR. In the original analysis of the data, errors in the angle measurement of the continuously rotating half-wave plate, a polarization modulator, caused significant data loss. By introducing an angle-correction algorithm, the data…
▽ More
We report an improved measurement of the degree-scale cosmic microwave background $B$-mode angular-power spectrum over 670 square-degree sky area at 150 GHz with POLARBEAR. In the original analysis of the data, errors in the angle measurement of the continuously rotating half-wave plate, a polarization modulator, caused significant data loss. By introducing an angle-correction algorithm, the data volume is increased by a factor of 1.8. We report a new analysis using the larger data set. We find the measured $B$-mode spectrum is consistent with the $Λ$CDM model with Galactic dust foregrounds. We estimate the contamination of the foreground by cross-correlating our data and Planck 143, 217, and 353 GHz measurements, where its spectrum is modeled as a power law in angular scale and a modified blackbody in frequency. We place an upper limit on the tensor-to-scalar ratio $r$ < 0.33 at 95% confidence level after marginalizing over the foreground parameters.
△ Less
Submitted 15 June, 2022; v1 submitted 4 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
A measurement of the CMB E-mode angular power spectrum at subdegree scales from 670 square degrees of POLARBEAR data
Authors:
S. Adachi,
M. A. O. Aguilar Faúndez,
K. Arnold,
C. Baccigalupi,
D. Barron,
D. Beck,
F. Bianchini,
S. Chapman,
K. Cheung,
Y. Chinone,
K. Crowley,
M. Dobbs,
H. El Bouhargani,
T. Elleflot,
J. Errard,
G. Fabbian,
C. Feng,
T. Fujino,
N. Galitzki,
N. Goeckner-Wald,
J. Groh,
G. Hall,
M. Hasegawa,
M. Hazumi,
H. Hirose
, et al. (31 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We report a measurement of the E-mode polarization power spectrum of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) using 150 GHz data taken from July 2014 to December 2016 with the POLARBEAR experiment. We reach an effective polarization map noise level of $32\,μ\mathrm{K}$-$\mathrm{arcmin}$ across an observation area of 670 square degrees. We measure the EE power spectrum over the angular multipole range…
▽ More
We report a measurement of the E-mode polarization power spectrum of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) using 150 GHz data taken from July 2014 to December 2016 with the POLARBEAR experiment. We reach an effective polarization map noise level of $32\,μ\mathrm{K}$-$\mathrm{arcmin}$ across an observation area of 670 square degrees. We measure the EE power spectrum over the angular multipole range $500 \leq \ell <3000$, tracing the third to seventh acoustic peaks with high sensitivity. The statistical uncertainty on E-mode bandpowers is $\sim 2.3 μ{\rm K}^2$ at $\ell \sim 1000$ with a systematic uncertainty of 0.5$μ{\rm K}^2$. The data are consistent with the standard $Λ$CDM cosmological model with a probability-to-exceed of 0.38. We combine recent CMB E-mode measurements and make inferences about cosmological parameters in $Λ$CDM as well as in extensions to $Λ$CDM. Adding the ground-based CMB polarization measurements to the Planck dataset reduces the uncertainty on the Hubble constant by a factor of 1.2 to $H_0 = 67.20 \pm 0.57 {\rm km\,s^{-1} \,Mpc^{-1}}$. When allowing the number of relativistic species ($N_{eff}$) to vary, we find $N_{eff} = 2.94 \pm 0.16$, which is in good agreement with the standard value of 3.046. Instead allowing the primordial helium abundance ($Y_{He}$) to vary, the data favor $Y_{He} = 0.248 \pm 0.012$. This is very close to the expectation of 0.2467 from Big Bang Nucleosynthesis. When varying both $Y_{He}$ and $N_{eff}$, we find $N_{eff} = 2.70 \pm 0.26$ and $Y_{He} = 0.262 \pm 0.015$.
△ Less
Submitted 13 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Lensing Power Spectrum from Two Years of POLARBEAR Data
Authors:
Mario Aguilar Faúndez,
Kam Arnold,
Carlo Baccigalupi,
Darcy Barron,
Dominic Beck,
Shawn Beckman,
Federico Bianchini,
Julien Carron,
Kolen Cheung,
Yuji Chinone,
Hamza El Bouhargani,
Tucker Elleflot,
Josquin Errard,
Giulio Fabbian,
Chang Feng,
Takuro Fujino,
Neil Goeckner-Wald,
Takaho Hamada,
Masaya Hasegawa,
Masashi Hazumi,
Charles A. Hill,
Haruaki Hirose,
Oliver Jeong,
Nobuhiko Katayama,
Brian Keating
, et al. (26 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present a measurement of the gravitational lensing deflection power spectrum reconstructed with two seasons cosmic microwave background polarization data from the POLARBEAR experiment. Observations were taken at 150 GHz from 2012 to 2014 which survey three patches of sky totaling 30 square degrees. We test the consistency of the lensing spectrum with a Cold Dark Matter (CDM) cosmology and rejec…
▽ More
We present a measurement of the gravitational lensing deflection power spectrum reconstructed with two seasons cosmic microwave background polarization data from the POLARBEAR experiment. Observations were taken at 150 GHz from 2012 to 2014 which survey three patches of sky totaling 30 square degrees. We test the consistency of the lensing spectrum with a Cold Dark Matter (CDM) cosmology and reject the no-lensing hypothesis at a confidence of 10.9 sigma including statistical and systematic uncertainties. We observe a value of A_L = 1.33 +/- 0.32 (statistical) +/- 0.02 (systematic) +/- 0.07 (foreground) using all polarization lensing estimators, which corresponds to a 24% accurate measurement of the lensing amplitude. Compared to the analysis of the first year data, we have improved the breadth of both the suite of null tests and the error terms included in the estimation of systematic contamination.
△ Less
Submitted 6 March, 2020; v1 submitted 25 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
