-
Understanding GPU Triggering APIs for MPI+X Communication
Authors:
Patrick G. Bridges,
Anthony Skjellum,
Evan D. Suggs,
Derek Schafer,
Purushotham V. Bangalore
Abstract:
GPU-enhanced architectures are now dominant in HPC systems, but message-passing communication involving GPUs with MPI has proven to be both complex and expensive, motivating new approaches that lower such costs. We compare and contrast stream/graph- and kernel-triggered MPI communication abstractions, whose principal purpose is to enhance the performance of communication when GPU kernels create or…
▽ More
GPU-enhanced architectures are now dominant in HPC systems, but message-passing communication involving GPUs with MPI has proven to be both complex and expensive, motivating new approaches that lower such costs. We compare and contrast stream/graph- and kernel-triggered MPI communication abstractions, whose principal purpose is to enhance the performance of communication when GPU kernels create or consume data for transfer through MPI operations. Researchers and practitioners have proposed multiple potential APIs for stream and/or kernel triggering that span various GPU architectures and approaches, including MPI-4 partitioned point-to-point communication, stream communicators, and explicit MPI stream/queue objects. Designs breaking backward compatibility with MPI are duly noted. Some of these strengthen or weaken the semantics of MPI operations. A key contribution of this paper is to promote community convergence toward a stream- and/or kernel-triggering abstraction by highlighting the common and differing goals and contributions of existing abstractions. We describe the design space in which these abstractions reside, their implicit or explicit use of stream and other non-MPI abstractions, their relationship to partitioned and persistent operations, and discuss their potential for added performance, how usable these abstractions are, and where functional and/or semantic gaps exist. Finally, we provide a taxonomy for stream- and kernel-triggered abstractions, including disambiguation of similar semantic terms, and consider directions for future standardization in MPI-5.
△ Less
Submitted 31 July, 2024; v1 submitted 8 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
MPIs Language Bindings are Holding MPI Back
Authors:
Martin Ruefenacht,
Derek Schafer,
Anthony Skjellum,
Purushotham V. Bangalore
Abstract:
Over the past two decades, C++ has been adopted as a major HPC language (displacing C to a large extent, andFortran to some degree as well). Idiomatic C++ is clearly how C++ is being used nowadays. But, MPIs syntax and semantics defined and extended with C and Fortran interfaces that align with the capabilities and limitations of C89 and Fortran-77.Unfortunately, the language-independent specifica…
▽ More
Over the past two decades, C++ has been adopted as a major HPC language (displacing C to a large extent, andFortran to some degree as well). Idiomatic C++ is clearly how C++ is being used nowadays. But, MPIs syntax and semantics defined and extended with C and Fortran interfaces that align with the capabilities and limitations of C89 and Fortran-77.Unfortunately, the language-independent specification also clearly reflects the intersection of what these languages could syntactically and semantically manage at the outset in 1993, rather than being truly language neutral.In this paper, we propose a modern C++ language interface to replace the C language binding for C++ programmers with an upward-compatible architecture that leverages all the benefits of C++11-20 for performance, productivity, and interoperability with other popular C++ libraries and interfaces for HPC. Demand is demonstrably strong for this second attempt at language support for C++ in MPI after the original interface, which was added in MPI-2, then was found to lack specific benefits over theC binding, and so was subsequently removed in MPI-3. Since C++ and its idiomatic usage have evolved since the original C++ language binding was removed from the standard, this new effort is both timely and important for MPI applications. Also, many C++ application programmers create their own, ad hoc shim libraries over MPI to provide some degree of abstraction unique to their particular project, which means many such abstraction libraries are being devised without any specific commonality other than the demand for such.
△ Less
Submitted 22 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
Analyzing the HCP Datasets using GPUs: The Anatomy of a Science Engagement
Authors:
John-Paul Robinson,
Thomas Anthony,
Ravi Tripathi,
Sara A. Sims,
Kristina M. Visscher,
Purushotham V. Bangalore
Abstract:
This paper documents the experience improving the performance of a data processing workflow for analysis of the Human Connectome Project's HCP900 data set. It describes how network and compute bottlenecks were discovered and resolved during the course of a science engagement. A series of computational enhancements to the stock FSL BedpostX workflow are described. These enhancements migrated the wo…
▽ More
This paper documents the experience improving the performance of a data processing workflow for analysis of the Human Connectome Project's HCP900 data set. It describes how network and compute bottlenecks were discovered and resolved during the course of a science engagement. A series of computational enhancements to the stock FSL BedpostX workflow are described. These enhancements migrated the workflow from a slow serial execution of computations resulting from Slurm scheduler incompatibilities to eventual execution on GPU resources, going from a 21-day execution on a single CPU core to a 2 hour execution on a GPU. This workflow contributed a vital use-case to the build-out of the campus compute cluster with additional GPUs and resulted in enhancements to network bandwidth. It also shares insights on potential improvements to distribution of scientific software to avoid stagnation in site-specific deployment decisions. The discussion highlights the advantages of open licenses and popular code collaboration sites like GitHub.com in feeding contributions upstream.
△ Less
Submitted 7 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
