-
Human-Aligned Calibration for AI-Assisted Decision Making
Authors:
Nina L. Corvelo Benz,
Manuel Gomez Rodriguez
Abstract:
Whenever a binary classifier is used to provide decision support, it typically provides both a label prediction and a confidence value. Then, the decision maker is supposed to use the confidence value to calibrate how much to trust the prediction. In this context, it has been often argued that the confidence value should correspond to a well calibrated estimate of the probability that the predicte…
▽ More
Whenever a binary classifier is used to provide decision support, it typically provides both a label prediction and a confidence value. Then, the decision maker is supposed to use the confidence value to calibrate how much to trust the prediction. In this context, it has been often argued that the confidence value should correspond to a well calibrated estimate of the probability that the predicted label matches the ground truth label. However, multiple lines of empirical evidence suggest that decision makers have difficulties at developing a good sense on when to trust a prediction using these confidence values. In this paper, our goal is first to understand why and then investigate how to construct more useful confidence values. We first argue that, for a broad class of utility functions, there exist data distributions for which a rational decision maker is, in general, unlikely to discover the optimal decision policy using the above confidence values -- an optimal decision maker would need to sometimes place more (less) trust on predictions with lower (higher) confidence values. However, we then show that, if the confidence values satisfy a natural alignment property with respect to the decision maker's confidence on her own predictions, there always exists an optimal decision policy under which the level of trust the decision maker would need to place on predictions is monotone on the confidence values, facilitating its discoverability. Further, we show that multicalibration with respect to the decision maker's confidence on her own predictions is a sufficient condition for alignment. Experiments on four different AI-assisted decision making tasks where a classifier provides decision support to real human experts validate our theoretical results and suggest that alignment may lead to better decisions.
△ Less
Submitted 23 February, 2024; v1 submitted 31 May, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
Counterfactual Inference of Second Opinions
Authors:
Nina L. Corvelo Benz,
Manuel Gomez Rodriguez
Abstract:
Automated decision support systems that are able to infer second opinions from experts can potentially facilitate a more efficient allocation of resources; they can help decide when and from whom to seek a second opinion. In this paper, we look at the design of this type of support systems from the perspective of counterfactual inference. We focus on a multiclass classification setting and first s…
▽ More
Automated decision support systems that are able to infer second opinions from experts can potentially facilitate a more efficient allocation of resources; they can help decide when and from whom to seek a second opinion. In this paper, we look at the design of this type of support systems from the perspective of counterfactual inference. We focus on a multiclass classification setting and first show that, if experts make predictions on their own, the underlying causal mechanism generating their predictions needs to satisfy a desirable set invariant property. Further, we show that, for any causal mechanism satisfying this property, there exists an equivalent mechanism where the predictions by each expert are generated by independent sub-mechanisms governed by a common noise. This motivates the design of a set invariant Gumbel-Max structural causal model where the structure of the noise governing the sub-mechanisms underpinning the model depends on an intuitive notion of similarity between experts which can be estimated from data. Experiments on both synthetic and real data show that our model can be used to infer second opinions more accurately than its non-causal counterpart.
△ Less
Submitted 30 June, 2022; v1 submitted 16 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
A Machine Learning Approach for Recruitment Prediction in Clinical Trial Design
Authors:
Jingshu Liu,
Patricia J Allen,
Luke Benz,
Daniel Blickstein,
Evon Okidi,
Xiao Shi
Abstract:
Significant advancements have been made in recent years to optimize patient recruitment for clinical trials, however, improved methods for patient recruitment prediction are needed to support trial site selection and to estimate appropriate enrollment timelines in the trial design stage. In this paper, using data from thousands of historical clinical trials, we explore machine learning methods to…
▽ More
Significant advancements have been made in recent years to optimize patient recruitment for clinical trials, however, improved methods for patient recruitment prediction are needed to support trial site selection and to estimate appropriate enrollment timelines in the trial design stage. In this paper, using data from thousands of historical clinical trials, we explore machine learning methods to predict the number of patients enrolled per month at a clinical trial site over the course of a trial's enrollment duration. We show that these methods can reduce the error that is observed with current industry standards and propose opportunities for further improvement.
△ Less
Submitted 14 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
