Zum Hauptinhalt springen

Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Boström, P

Searching in archive cs. Search in all archives.
.
  1. arXiv:2407.18060  [pdf, other

    cs.LG

    Cross-Vendor Reproducibility of Radiomics-based Machine Learning Models for Computer-aided Diagnosis

    Authors: Jatin Chaudhary, Ivan Jambor, Hannu Aronen, Otto Ettala, Jani Saunavaara, Peter Boström, Jukka Heikkonen, Rajeev Kanth, Harri Merisaari

    Abstract: Background: The reproducibility of machine-learning models in prostate cancer detection across different MRI vendors remains a significant challenge. Methods: This study investigates Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Random Forest (RF) models trained on radiomic features extracted from T2-weighted MRI images using Pyradiomics and MRCradiomics libraries. Feature selection was performed using the ma… ▽ More

    Submitted 25 July, 2024; originally announced July 2024.

  2. arXiv:2010.15233  [pdf

    eess.IV cs.CV cs.LG

    Accurate Prostate Cancer Detection and Segmentation on Biparametric MRI using Non-local Mask R-CNN with Histopathological Ground Truth

    Authors: Zhenzhen Dai, Ivan Jambor, Pekka Taimen, Milan Pantelic, Mohamed Elshaikh, Craig Rogers, Otto Ettala, Peter Boström, Hannu Aronen, Harri Merisaari, Ning Wen

    Abstract: Purpose: We aimed to develop deep machine learning (DL) models to improve the detection and segmentation of intraprostatic lesions (IL) on bp-MRI by using whole amount prostatectomy specimen-based delineations. We also aimed to investigate whether transfer learning and self-training would improve results with small amount labelled data. Methods: 158 patients had suspicious lesions delineated on… ▽ More

    Submitted 28 October, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

  3. Concurrent Scheduling of Event-B Models

    Authors: Pontus Boström, Fredrik Degerlund, Kaisa Sere, Marina Waldén

    Abstract: Event-B is a refinement-based formal method that has been shown to be useful in developing concurrent and distributed programs. Large models can be decomposed into sub-models that can be refined semi-independently and executed in parallel. In this paper, we show how to introduce explicit control flow for the concurrent sub-models in the form of event schedules. We explore how schedules can be desi… ▽ More

    Submitted 21 June, 2011; originally announced June 2011.

    Comments: In Proceedings Refine 2011, arXiv:1106.3488

    Journal ref: EPTCS 55, 2011, pp. 166-182