-
Mapping polygons to the grid with small Hausdorff and Fréchet distance
Authors:
Quirijn W. Bouts,
Irina Kostitsyna,
Marc van Kreveld,
Wouter Meulemans,
Willem Sonke,
Kevin Verbeek
Abstract:
We show how to represent a simple polygon $P$ by a grid (pixel-based) polygon $Q$ that is simple and whose Hausdorff or Fréchet distance to $P$ is small. For any simple polygon $P$, a grid polygon exists with constant Hausdorff distance between their boundaries and their interiors. Moreover, we show that with a realistic input assumption we can also realize constant Fréchet distance between the bo…
▽ More
We show how to represent a simple polygon $P$ by a grid (pixel-based) polygon $Q$ that is simple and whose Hausdorff or Fréchet distance to $P$ is small. For any simple polygon $P$, a grid polygon exists with constant Hausdorff distance between their boundaries and their interiors. Moreover, we show that with a realistic input assumption we can also realize constant Fréchet distance between the boundaries. We present algorithms accompanying these constructions, heuristics to improve their output while keeping the distance bounds, and experiments to assess the output.
△ Less
Submitted 21 June, 2016;
originally announced June 2016.
-
Distribution-Sensitive Construction of the Greedy Spanner
Authors:
Sander P. A. Alewijnse,
Quirijn W. Bouts,
Alex P. ten Brink,
Kevin Buchin
Abstract:
The greedy spanner is the highest quality geometric spanner (in e.g. edge count and weight, both in theory and practice) known to be computable in polynomial time. Unfortunately, all known algorithms for computing it take Omega(n^2) time, limiting its applicability on large data sets.
We observe that for many point sets, the greedy spanner has many `short' edges that can be determined locally an…
▽ More
The greedy spanner is the highest quality geometric spanner (in e.g. edge count and weight, both in theory and practice) known to be computable in polynomial time. Unfortunately, all known algorithms for computing it take Omega(n^2) time, limiting its applicability on large data sets.
We observe that for many point sets, the greedy spanner has many `short' edges that can be determined locally and usually quickly, and few or no `long' edges that can usually be determined quickly using local information and the well-separated pair decomposition. We give experimental results showing large to massive performance increases over the state-of-the-art on nearly all tests and real-life data sets. On the theoretical side we prove a near-linear expected time bound on uniform point sets and a near-quadratic worst-case bound.
Our bound for point sets drawn uniformly and independently at random in a square follows from a local characterization of t-spanners we give on such point sets: we give a geometric property that holds with high probability on such point sets. This property implies that if an edge set on these points has t-paths between pairs of points `close' to each other, then it has t-paths between all pairs of points.
This characterization gives a O(n log^2 n log^2 log n) expected time bound on our greedy spanner algorithm, making it the first subquadratic time algorithm for this problem on any interesting class of points. We also use this characterization to give a O((n + |E|) log^2 n log log n) expected time algorithm on uniformly distributed points that determines if E is a t-spanner, making it the first subquadratic time algorithm for this problem that does not make assumptions on E.
△ Less
Submitted 30 June, 2014; v1 submitted 6 January, 2014;
originally announced January 2014.
-
Computing the Greedy Spanner in Linear Space
Authors:
Sander P. A. Alewijnse,
Quirijn W. Bouts,
Alex P. ten Brink,
Kevin Buchin
Abstract:
The greedy spanner is a high-quality spanner: its total weight, edge count and maximal degree are asymptotically optimal and in practice significantly better than for any other spanner with reasonable construction time. Unfortunately, all known algorithms that compute the greedy spanner of n points use Omega(n^2) space, which is impractical on large instances. To the best of our knowledge, the lar…
▽ More
The greedy spanner is a high-quality spanner: its total weight, edge count and maximal degree are asymptotically optimal and in practice significantly better than for any other spanner with reasonable construction time. Unfortunately, all known algorithms that compute the greedy spanner of n points use Omega(n^2) space, which is impractical on large instances. To the best of our knowledge, the largest instance for which the greedy spanner was computed so far has about 13,000 vertices.
We present a O(n)-space algorithm that computes the same spanner for points in R^d running in O(n^2 log^2 n) time for any fixed stretch factor and dimension. We discuss and evaluate a number of optimizations to its running time, which allowed us to compute the greedy spanner on a graph with a million vertices. To our knowledge, this is also the first algorithm for the greedy spanner with a near-quadratic running time guarantee that has actually been implemented.
△ Less
Submitted 20 June, 2013;
originally announced June 2013.
