-
Benchmarking foundation models as feature extractors for weakly-supervised computational pathology
Authors:
Peter Neidlinger,
Omar S. M. El Nahhas,
Hannah Sophie Muti,
Tim Lenz,
Michael Hoffmeister,
Hermann Brenner,
Marko van Treeck,
Rupert Langer,
Bastian Dislich,
Hans Michael Behrens,
Christoph Röcken,
Sebastian Foersch,
Daniel Truhn,
Antonio Marra,
Oliver Lester Saldanha,
Jakob Nikolas Kather
Abstract:
Advancements in artificial intelligence have driven the development of numerous pathology foundation models capable of extracting clinically relevant information. However, there is currently limited literature independently evaluating these foundation models on truly external cohorts and clinically-relevant tasks to uncover adjustments for future improvements. In this study, we benchmarked ten his…
▽ More
Advancements in artificial intelligence have driven the development of numerous pathology foundation models capable of extracting clinically relevant information. However, there is currently limited literature independently evaluating these foundation models on truly external cohorts and clinically-relevant tasks to uncover adjustments for future improvements. In this study, we benchmarked ten histopathology foundation models on 13 patient cohorts with 6,791 patients and 9,493 slides from lung, colorectal, gastric, and breast cancers. The models were evaluated on weakly-supervised tasks related to biomarkers, morphological properties, and prognostic outcomes. We show that a vision-language foundation model, CONCH, yielded the highest performance in 42% of tasks when compared to vision-only foundation models. The experiments reveal that foundation models trained on distinct cohorts learn complementary features to predict the same label, and can be fused to outperform the current state of the art. Creating an ensemble of complementary foundation models outperformed CONCH in 66% of tasks. Moreover, our findings suggest that data diversity outweighs data volume for foundation models. Our work highlights actionable adjustments to improve pathology foundation models.
△ Less
Submitted 28 August, 2024;
originally announced August 2024.
-
Regression-based Deep-Learning predicts molecular biomarkers from pathology slides
Authors:
Omar S. M. El Nahhas,
Chiara M. L. Loeffler,
Zunamys I. Carrero,
Marko van Treeck,
Fiona R. Kolbinger,
Katherine J. Hewitt,
Hannah S. Muti,
Mara Graziani,
Qinghe Zeng,
Julien Calderaro,
Nadina Ortiz-Brüchle,
Tanwei Yuan,
Michael Hoffmeister,
Hermann Brenner,
Alexander Brobeil,
Jorge S. Reis-Filho,
Jakob Nikolas Kather
Abstract:
Deep Learning (DL) can predict biomarkers from cancer histopathology. Several clinically approved applications use this technology. Most approaches, however, predict categorical labels, whereas biomarkers are often continuous measurements. We hypothesized that regression-based DL outperforms classification-based DL. Therefore, we developed and evaluated a new self-supervised attention-based weakly…
▽ More
Deep Learning (DL) can predict biomarkers from cancer histopathology. Several clinically approved applications use this technology. Most approaches, however, predict categorical labels, whereas biomarkers are often continuous measurements. We hypothesized that regression-based DL outperforms classification-based DL. Therefore, we developed and evaluated a new self-supervised attention-based weakly supervised regression method that predicts continuous biomarkers directly from images in 11,671 patients across nine cancer types. We tested our method for multiple clinically and biologically relevant biomarkers: homologous repair deficiency (HRD) score, a clinically used pan-cancer biomarker, as well as markers of key biological processes in the tumor microenvironment. Using regression significantly enhances the accuracy of biomarker prediction, while also improving the interpretability of the results over classification. In a large cohort of colorectal cancer patients, regression-based prediction scores provide a higher prognostic value than classification-based scores. Our open-source regression approach offers a promising alternative for continuous biomarker analysis in computational pathology.
△ Less
Submitted 11 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
Fully transformer-based biomarker prediction from colorectal cancer histology: a large-scale multicentric study
Authors:
Sophia J. Wagner,
Daniel Reisenbüchler,
Nicholas P. West,
Jan Moritz Niehues,
Gregory Patrick Veldhuizen,
Philip Quirke,
Heike I. Grabsch,
Piet A. van den Brandt,
Gordon G. A. Hutchins,
Susan D. Richman,
Tanwei Yuan,
Rupert Langer,
Josien Christina Anna Jenniskens,
Kelly Offermans,
Wolfram Mueller,
Richard Gray,
Stephen B. Gruber,
Joel K. Greenson,
Gad Rennert,
Joseph D. Bonner,
Daniel Schmolze,
Jacqueline A. James,
Maurice B. Loughrey,
Manuel Salto-Tellez,
Hermann Brenner
, et al. (6 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Background: Deep learning (DL) can extract predictive and prognostic biomarkers from routine pathology slides in colorectal cancer. For example, a DL test for the diagnosis of microsatellite instability (MSI) in CRC has been approved in 2022. Current approaches rely on convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Transformer networks are outperforming CNNs and are replacing them in many applications, but…
▽ More
Background: Deep learning (DL) can extract predictive and prognostic biomarkers from routine pathology slides in colorectal cancer. For example, a DL test for the diagnosis of microsatellite instability (MSI) in CRC has been approved in 2022. Current approaches rely on convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Transformer networks are outperforming CNNs and are replacing them in many applications, but have not been used for biomarker prediction in cancer at a large scale. In addition, most DL approaches have been trained on small patient cohorts, which limits their clinical utility. Methods: In this study, we developed a new fully transformer-based pipeline for end-to-end biomarker prediction from pathology slides. We combine a pre-trained transformer encoder and a transformer network for patch aggregation, capable of yielding single and multi-target prediction at patient level. We train our pipeline on over 9,000 patients from 10 colorectal cancer cohorts. Results: A fully transformer-based approach massively improves the performance, generalizability, data efficiency, and interpretability as compared with current state-of-the-art algorithms. After training on a large multicenter cohort, we achieve a sensitivity of 0.97 with a negative predictive value of 0.99 for MSI prediction on surgical resection specimens. We demonstrate for the first time that resection specimen-only training reaches clinical-grade performance on endoscopic biopsy tissue, solving a long-standing diagnostic problem. Interpretation: A fully transformer-based end-to-end pipeline trained on thousands of pathology slides yields clinical-grade performance for biomarker prediction on surgical resections and biopsies. Our new methods are freely available under an open source license.
△ Less
Submitted 1 March, 2023; v1 submitted 23 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
Impossibility of Differentially Private Universally Optimal Mechanisms
Authors:
Hai Brenner,
Kobbi Nissim
Abstract:
The notion of a universally utility-maximizing privacy mechanism was recently introduced by Ghosh, Roughgarden, and Sundararajan [STOC 2009]. These are mechanisms that guarantee optimal utility to a large class of information consumers, simultaneously, while preserving Differential Privacy [Dwork, McSherry, Nissim, and Smith, TCC 2006]. Ghosh et al. have demonstrated, quite surprisingly, a case wh…
▽ More
The notion of a universally utility-maximizing privacy mechanism was recently introduced by Ghosh, Roughgarden, and Sundararajan [STOC 2009]. These are mechanisms that guarantee optimal utility to a large class of information consumers, simultaneously, while preserving Differential Privacy [Dwork, McSherry, Nissim, and Smith, TCC 2006]. Ghosh et al. have demonstrated, quite surprisingly, a case where such a universally-optimal differentially-private mechanisms exists, when the information consumers are Bayesian. This result was recently extended by Gupte and Sundararajan [PODS 2010] to risk-averse consumers.
Both positive results deal with mechanisms (approximately) computing a single count query (i.e., the number of individuals satisfying a specific property in a given population), and the starting point of our work is a trial at extending these results to similar settings, such as sum queries with non-binary individual values, histograms, and two (or more) count queries. We show, however, that universally-optimal mechanisms do not exist for all these queries, both for Bayesian and risk-averse consumers.
For the Bayesian case, we go further, and give a characterization of those functions that admit universally-optimal mechanisms, showing that a universally-optimal mechanism exists, essentially, only for a (single) count query. At the heart of our proof is a representation of a query function $f$ by its privacy constraint graph $G_f$ whose edges correspond to values resulting by applying $f$ to neighboring databases.
△ Less
Submitted 2 August, 2010;
originally announced August 2010.
