Frosty: Bringing strong liveness guarantees to the Snow family of consensus protocols
Authors:
Aaron Buchwald,
Stephen Buttolph,
Andrew Lewis-Pye,
Patrick O'Grady,
Kevin Sekniqi
Abstract:
Snowman is the consensus protocol implemented by the Avalanche blockchain and is part of the Snow family of protocols, first introduced through the original Avalanche leaderless consensus protocol. A major advantage of Snowman is that each consensus decision only requires an expected constant communication overhead per processor in the `common' case that the protocol is not under substantial Byzan…
▽ More
Snowman is the consensus protocol implemented by the Avalanche blockchain and is part of the Snow family of protocols, first introduced through the original Avalanche leaderless consensus protocol. A major advantage of Snowman is that each consensus decision only requires an expected constant communication overhead per processor in the `common' case that the protocol is not under substantial Byzantine attack, i.e. it provides a solution to the scalability problem which ensures that the expected communication overhead per processor is independent of the total number of processors $n$ during normal operation. This is the key property that would enable a consensus protocol to scale to 10,000 or more independent validators (i.e. processors). On the other hand, the two following concerns have remained:
(1) Providing formal proofs of consistency for Snowman has presented a formidable challenge.
(2) Liveness attacks exist in the case that a Byzantine adversary controls more than $O(\sqrt{n})$ processors, slowing termination to more than a logarithmic number of steps.
In this paper, we address the two issues above. We consider a Byzantine adversary that controls at most $f<n/5$ processors. First, we provide a simple proof of consistency for Snowman. Then we supplement Snowman with a `liveness module' that can be triggered in the case that a substantial adversary launches a liveness attack, and which guarantees liveness in this event by temporarily forgoing the communication complexity advantages of Snowman, but without sacrificing these low communication complexity advantages during normal operation.
△ Less
Submitted 26 July, 2024; v1 submitted 22 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
DDKtor: Automatic Diadochokinetic Speech Analysis
Authors:
Yael Segal,
Kasia Hitczenko,
Matthew Goldrick,
Adam Buchwald,
Angela Roberts,
Joseph Keshet
Abstract:
Diadochokinetic speech tasks (DDK), in which participants repeatedly produce syllables, are commonly used as part of the assessment of speech motor impairments. These studies rely on manual analyses that are time-intensive, subjective, and provide only a coarse-grained picture of speech. This paper presents two deep neural network models that automatically segment consonants and vowels from unanno…
▽ More
Diadochokinetic speech tasks (DDK), in which participants repeatedly produce syllables, are commonly used as part of the assessment of speech motor impairments. These studies rely on manual analyses that are time-intensive, subjective, and provide only a coarse-grained picture of speech. This paper presents two deep neural network models that automatically segment consonants and vowels from unannotated, untranscribed speech. Both models work on the raw waveform and use convolutional layers for feature extraction. The first model is based on an LSTM classifier followed by fully connected layers, while the second model adds more convolutional layers followed by fully connected layers. These segmentations predicted by the models are used to obtain measures of speech rate and sound duration. Results on a young healthy individuals dataset show that our LSTM model outperforms the current state-of-the-art systems and performs comparably to trained human annotators. Moreover, the LSTM model also presents comparable results to trained human annotators when evaluated on unseen older individuals with Parkinson's Disease dataset.
△ Less
Submitted 29 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
