-
Temporal Fairness in Decision Making Problems
Authors:
Manuel R. Torres,
Parisa Zehtabi,
Michael Cashmore,
Daniele Magazzeni,
Manuela Veloso
Abstract:
In this work we consider a new interpretation of fairness in decision making problems. Building upon existing fairness formulations, we focus on how to reason over fairness from a temporal perspective, taking into account the fairness of a history of past decisions. After introducing the concept of temporal fairness, we propose three approaches that incorporate temporal fairness in decision making…
▽ More
In this work we consider a new interpretation of fairness in decision making problems. Building upon existing fairness formulations, we focus on how to reason over fairness from a temporal perspective, taking into account the fairness of a history of past decisions. After introducing the concept of temporal fairness, we propose three approaches that incorporate temporal fairness in decision making problems formulated as optimization problems. We present a qualitative evaluation of our approach in four different domains and compare the solutions against a baseline approach that does not consider the temporal aspect of fairness.
△ Less
Submitted 23 August, 2024;
originally announced August 2024.
-
Deep Reinforcement Learning and Mean-Variance Strategies for Responsible Portfolio Optimization
Authors:
Fernando Acero,
Parisa Zehtabi,
Nicolas Marchesotti,
Michael Cashmore,
Daniele Magazzeni,
Manuela Veloso
Abstract:
Portfolio optimization involves determining the optimal allocation of portfolio assets in order to maximize a given investment objective. Traditionally, some form of mean-variance optimization is used with the aim of maximizing returns while minimizing risk, however, more recently, deep reinforcement learning formulations have been explored. Increasingly, investors have demonstrated an interest in…
▽ More
Portfolio optimization involves determining the optimal allocation of portfolio assets in order to maximize a given investment objective. Traditionally, some form of mean-variance optimization is used with the aim of maximizing returns while minimizing risk, however, more recently, deep reinforcement learning formulations have been explored. Increasingly, investors have demonstrated an interest in incorporating ESG objectives when making investment decisions, and modifications to the classical mean-variance optimization framework have been developed. In this work, we study the use of deep reinforcement learning for responsible portfolio optimization, by incorporating ESG states and objectives, and provide comparisons against modified mean-variance approaches. Our results show that deep reinforcement learning policies can provide competitive performance against mean-variance approaches for responsible portfolio allocation across additive and multiplicative utility functions of financial and ESG responsibility objectives.
△ Less
Submitted 25 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Surrogate Assisted Monte Carlo Tree Search in Combinatorial Optimization
Authors:
Saeid Amiri,
Parisa Zehtabi,
Danial Dervovic,
Michael Cashmore
Abstract:
Industries frequently adjust their facilities network by opening new branches in promising areas and closing branches in areas where they expect low profits. In this paper, we examine a particular class of facility location problems. Our objective is to minimize the loss of sales resulting from the removal of several retail stores. However, estimating sales accurately is expensive and time-consumi…
▽ More
Industries frequently adjust their facilities network by opening new branches in promising areas and closing branches in areas where they expect low profits. In this paper, we examine a particular class of facility location problems. Our objective is to minimize the loss of sales resulting from the removal of several retail stores. However, estimating sales accurately is expensive and time-consuming. To overcome this challenge, we leverage Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) assisted by a surrogate model that computes evaluations faster. Results suggest that MCTS supported by a fast surrogate function can generate solutions faster while maintaining a consistent solution compared to MCTS that does not benefit from the surrogate function.
△ Less
Submitted 14 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Accelerating Cutting-Plane Algorithms via Reinforcement Learning Surrogates
Authors:
Kyle Mana,
Fernando Acero,
Stephen Mak,
Parisa Zehtabi,
Michael Cashmore,
Daniele Magazzeni,
Manuela Veloso
Abstract:
Discrete optimization belongs to the set of $\mathcal{NP}$-hard problems, spanning fields such as mixed-integer programming and combinatorial optimization. A current standard approach to solving convex discrete optimization problems is the use of cutting-plane algorithms, which reach optimal solutions by iteratively adding inequalities known as \textit{cuts} to refine a feasible set. Despite the e…
▽ More
Discrete optimization belongs to the set of $\mathcal{NP}$-hard problems, spanning fields such as mixed-integer programming and combinatorial optimization. A current standard approach to solving convex discrete optimization problems is the use of cutting-plane algorithms, which reach optimal solutions by iteratively adding inequalities known as \textit{cuts} to refine a feasible set. Despite the existence of a number of general-purpose cut-generating algorithms, large-scale discrete optimization problems continue to suffer from intractability. In this work, we propose a method for accelerating cutting-plane algorithms via reinforcement learning. Our approach uses learned policies as surrogates for $\mathcal{NP}$-hard elements of the cut generating procedure in a way that (i) accelerates convergence, and (ii) retains guarantees of optimality. We apply our method on two types of problems where cutting-plane algorithms are commonly used: stochastic optimization, and mixed-integer quadratic programming. We observe the benefits of our method when applied to Benders decomposition (stochastic optimization) and iterative loss approximation (quadratic programming), achieving up to $45\%$ faster average convergence when compared to modern alternative algorithms.
△ Less
Submitted 27 February, 2024; v1 submitted 17 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Contrastive Explanations of Plans Through Model Restrictions
Authors:
Benjamin Krarup,
Senka Krivic,
Daniele Magazzeni,
Derek Long,
Michael Cashmore,
David E. Smith
Abstract:
In automated planning, the need for explanations arises when there is a mismatch between a proposed plan and the user's expectation. We frame Explainable AI Planning in the context of the plan negotiation problem, in which a succession of hypothetical planning problems are generated and solved. The object of the negotiation is for the user to understand and ultimately arrive at a satisfactory plan…
▽ More
In automated planning, the need for explanations arises when there is a mismatch between a proposed plan and the user's expectation. We frame Explainable AI Planning in the context of the plan negotiation problem, in which a succession of hypothetical planning problems are generated and solved. The object of the negotiation is for the user to understand and ultimately arrive at a satisfactory plan. We present the results of a user study that demonstrates that when users ask questions about plans, those questions are contrastive, i.e. "why A rather than B?". We use the data from this study to construct a taxonomy of user questions that often arise during plan negotiation. We formally define our approach to plan negotiation through model restriction as an iterative process. This approach generates hypothetical problems and contrastive plans by restricting the model through constraints implied by user questions. We formally define model-based compilations in PDDL2.1 of each constraint derived from a user question in the taxonomy, and empirically evaluate the compilations in terms of computational complexity. The compilations were implemented as part of an explanation framework that employs iterative model restriction. We demonstrate its benefits in a second user study.
△ Less
Submitted 29 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
Robust Plan Execution with Unexpected Observations
Authors:
Oscar Lima,
Michael Cashmore,
Daniele Magazzeni,
Andrea Micheli,
Rodrigo Ventura
Abstract:
In order to ensure the robust actuation of a plan, execution must be adaptable to unexpected situations in the world and to exogenous events. This is critical in domains in which committing to a wrong ordering of actions can cause the plan failure, even when all the actions succeed. We propose an approach to the execution of a task plan that permits some adaptability to unexpected observations of…
▽ More
In order to ensure the robust actuation of a plan, execution must be adaptable to unexpected situations in the world and to exogenous events. This is critical in domains in which committing to a wrong ordering of actions can cause the plan failure, even when all the actions succeed. We propose an approach to the execution of a task plan that permits some adaptability to unexpected observations of the state while maintaining the validity of the plan through online reasoning.
Our approach computes an adaptable, partially-ordered plan from a given totally-ordered plan. The partially-ordered plan is adaptable in that it can exploit beneficial differences between the world and what was expected. The approach is general in that it can be used with any task planner that produces either a totally or a partially-ordered plan. We propose a plan execution algorithm that computes online the complete set of valid totally-ordered plans described by an adaptable partially-ordered plan together with the probability of success for each of them. This set is then used to choose the next action to execute.
△ Less
Submitted 20 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.
-
Towards Efficient Anytime Computation and Execution of Decoupled Robustness Envelopes for Temporal Plans
Authors:
Michael Cashmore,
Alessandro Cimatti,
Daniele Magazzeni,
Andrea Micheli,
Parisa Zehtabi
Abstract:
One of the major limitations for the employment of model-based planning and scheduling in practical applications is the need of costly re-planning when an incongruence between the observed reality and the formal model is encountered during execution. Robustness Envelopes characterize the set of possible contingencies that a plan is able to address without re-planning, but their exact computation i…
▽ More
One of the major limitations for the employment of model-based planning and scheduling in practical applications is the need of costly re-planning when an incongruence between the observed reality and the formal model is encountered during execution. Robustness Envelopes characterize the set of possible contingencies that a plan is able to address without re-planning, but their exact computation is extremely expensive; furthermore, general robustness envelopes are not amenable for efficient execution. In this paper, we present a novel, anytime algorithm to approximate Robustness Envelopes, making them scalable and executable. This is proven by an experimental analysis showing the efficiency of the algorithm, and by a concrete case study where the execution of robustness envelopes significantly reduces the number of re-plannings.
△ Less
Submitted 17 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
Towards Explainable AI Planning as a Service
Authors:
Michael Cashmore,
Anna Collins,
Benjamin Krarup,
Senka Krivic,
Daniele Magazzeni,
David Smith
Abstract:
Explainable AI is an important area of research within which Explainable Planning is an emerging topic. In this paper, we argue that Explainable Planning can be designed as a service -- that is, as a wrapper around an existing planning system that utilises the existing planner to assist in answering contrastive questions. We introduce a prototype framework to facilitate this, along with some examp…
▽ More
Explainable AI is an important area of research within which Explainable Planning is an emerging topic. In this paper, we argue that Explainable Planning can be designed as a service -- that is, as a wrapper around an existing planning system that utilises the existing planner to assist in answering contrastive questions. We introduce a prototype framework to facilitate this, along with some examples of how a planner can be used to address certain types of contrastive questions. We discuss the main advantages and limitations of such an approach and we identify open questions for Explainable Planning as a service that identify several possible research directions.
△ Less
Submitted 14 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
-
Towards Providing Explanations for AI Planner Decisions
Authors:
Rita Borgo,
Michael Cashmore,
Daniele Magazzeni
Abstract:
In order to engender trust in AI, humans must understand what an AI system is trying to achieve, and why. To overcome this problem, the underlying AI process must produce justifications and explanations that are both transparent and comprehensible to the user. AI Planning is well placed to be able to address this challenge. In this paper we present a methodology to provide initial explanations for…
▽ More
In order to engender trust in AI, humans must understand what an AI system is trying to achieve, and why. To overcome this problem, the underlying AI process must produce justifications and explanations that are both transparent and comprehensible to the user. AI Planning is well placed to be able to address this challenge. In this paper we present a methodology to provide initial explanations for the decisions made by the planner. Explanations are created by allowing the user to suggest alternative actions in plans and then compare the resulting plans with the one found by the planner. The methodology is implemented in the new XAI-Plan framework.
△ Less
Submitted 15 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
