Showing 1–48 of 48 results for author: Cutkosky, A

Empirical Tests of Optimization Assumptions in Deep Learning

Authors: Hoang Tran, Qinzi Zhang, Ashok Cutkosky

Abstract: There is a significant gap between our theoretical understanding of optimization algorithms used in deep learning and their practical performance. Theoretical development usually focuses on proving convergence guarantees under a variety of different assumptions, which are themselves often chosen based on a rough combination of intuitive match to practice and analytical convenience. The theory/prac… ▽ More There is a significant gap between our theoretical understanding of optimization algorithms used in deep learning and their practical performance. Theoretical development usually focuses on proving convergence guarantees under a variety of different assumptions, which are themselves often chosen based on a rough combination of intuitive match to practice and analytical convenience. The theory/practice gap may then arise because of the failure to prove a theorem under such assumptions, or because the assumptions do not reflect reality. In this paper, we carefully measure the degree to which these assumptions are capable of explaining modern optimization algorithms by developing new empirical metrics that closely track the key quantities that must be controlled in theoretical analysis. All of our tested assumptions (including typical modern assumptions based on bounds on the Hessian) fail to reliably capture optimization performance. This highlights a need for new empirical verification of analytical assumptions used in theoretical analysis. △ Less

Submitted 1 July, 2024; originally announced July 2024.

Private Zeroth-Order Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization

Authors: Qinzi Zhang, Hoang Tran, Ashok Cutkosky

Abstract: We introduce a new zeroth-order algorithm for private stochastic optimization on nonconvex and nonsmooth objectives. Given a dataset of size $M$, our algorithm ensures $(α,αρ^2/2)$-Rényi differential privacy and finds a $(δ,ε)$-stationary point so long as $M=\tildeΩ\left(\frac{d}{δε^3} + \frac{d^{3/2}}{ρδε^2}\right)$. This matches the optimal complexity of its non-private zeroth-order analog. Nota… ▽ More We introduce a new zeroth-order algorithm for private stochastic optimization on nonconvex and nonsmooth objectives. Given a dataset of size $M$, our algorithm ensures $(α,αρ^2/2)$-Rényi differential privacy and finds a $(δ,ε)$-stationary point so long as $M=\tildeΩ\left(\frac{d}{δε^3} + \frac{d^{3/2}}{ρδε^2}\right)$. This matches the optimal complexity of its non-private zeroth-order analog. Notably, although the objective is not smooth, we have privacy ``for free'' whenever $ρ\ge \sqrt{d}ε$. △ Less

Submitted 27 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

Fully Unconstrained Online Learning

Authors: Ashok Cutkosky, Zakaria Mhammedi

Abstract: We provide an online learning algorithm that obtains regret $G\|w_\star\|\sqrt{T\log(\|w_\star\|G\sqrt{T})} + \|w_\star\|^2 + G^2$ on $G$-Lipschitz convex losses for any comparison point $w_\star$ without knowing either $G$ or $\|w_\star\|$. Importantly, this matches the optimal bound $G\|w_\star\|\sqrt{T}$ available with such knowledge (up to logarithmic factors), unless either $\|w_\star\|$ or… ▽ More We provide an online learning algorithm that obtains regret $G\|w_\star\|\sqrt{T\log(\|w_\star\|G\sqrt{T})} + \|w_\star\|^2 + G^2$ on $G$-Lipschitz convex losses for any comparison point $w_\star$ without knowing either $G$ or $\|w_\star\|$. Importantly, this matches the optimal bound $G\|w_\star\|\sqrt{T}$ available with such knowledge (up to logarithmic factors), unless either $\|w_\star\|$ or $G$ is so large that even $G\|w_\star\|\sqrt{T}$ is roughly linear in $T$. Thus, it matches the optimal bound in all cases in which one can achieve sublinear regret, which arguably most "interesting" scenarios. △ Less

Submitted 30 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Online Linear Regression in Dynamic Environments via Discounting

Authors: Andrew Jacobsen, Ashok Cutkosky

Abstract: We develop algorithms for online linear regression which achieve optimal static and dynamic regret guarantees \emph{even in the complete absence of prior knowledge}. We present a novel analysis showing that a discounted variant of the Vovk-Azoury-Warmuth forecaster achieves dynamic regret of the form $R_{T}(\vec{u})\le O\left(d\log(T)\vee \sqrt{dP_{T}^γ(\vec{u})T}\right)$, where… ▽ More We develop algorithms for online linear regression which achieve optimal static and dynamic regret guarantees \emph{even in the complete absence of prior knowledge}. We present a novel analysis showing that a discounted variant of the Vovk-Azoury-Warmuth forecaster achieves dynamic regret of the form $R_{T}(\vec{u})\le O\left(d\log(T)\vee \sqrt{dP_{T}^γ(\vec{u})T}\right)$, where $P_{T}^γ(\vec{u})$ is a measure of variability of the comparator sequence, and show that the discount factor achieving this result can be learned on-the-fly. We show that this result is optimal by providing a matching lower bound. We also extend our results to \emph{strongly-adaptive} guarantees which hold over every sub-interval $[a,b]\subseteq[1,T]$ simultaneously. △ Less

Submitted 29 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Comments: ICML 2024, 38 pages

Adam with model exponential moving average is effective for nonconvex optimization

Authors: Kwangjun Ahn, Ashok Cutkosky

Abstract: In this work, we offer a theoretical analysis of two modern optimization techniques for training large and complex models: (i) adaptive optimization algorithms, such as Adam, and (ii) the model exponential moving average (EMA). Specifically, we demonstrate that a clipped version of Adam with model EMA achieves the optimal convergence rates in various nonconvex optimization settings, both smooth an… ▽ More In this work, we offer a theoretical analysis of two modern optimization techniques for training large and complex models: (i) adaptive optimization algorithms, such as Adam, and (ii) the model exponential moving average (EMA). Specifically, we demonstrate that a clipped version of Adam with model EMA achieves the optimal convergence rates in various nonconvex optimization settings, both smooth and nonsmooth. Moreover, when the scale varies significantly across different coordinates, we demonstrate that the coordinate-wise adaptivity of Adam is provably advantageous. Notably, unlike previous analyses of Adam, our analysis crucially relies on its core elements -- momentum and discounting factors -- as well as model EMA, motivating their wide applications in practice. △ Less

Submitted 28 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Comments: Comments would be appreciated!

The Road Less Scheduled

Authors: Aaron Defazio, Xingyu Alice Yang, Harsh Mehta, Konstantin Mishchenko, Ahmed Khaled, Ashok Cutkosky

Abstract: Existing learning rate schedules that do not require specification of the optimization stopping step T are greatly out-performed by learning rate schedules that depend on T. We propose an approach that avoids the need for this stopping time by eschewing the use of schedules entirely, while exhibiting state-of-the-art performance compared to schedules across a wide family of problems ranging from c… ▽ More Existing learning rate schedules that do not require specification of the optimization stopping step T are greatly out-performed by learning rate schedules that depend on T. We propose an approach that avoids the need for this stopping time by eschewing the use of schedules entirely, while exhibiting state-of-the-art performance compared to schedules across a wide family of problems ranging from convex problems to large-scale deep learning problems. Our Schedule-Free approach introduces no additional hyper-parameters over standard optimizers with momentum. Our method is a direct consequence of a new theory we develop that unifies scheduling and iterate averaging. An open source implementation of our method is available (https://github.com/facebookresearch/schedule_free). △ Less

Submitted 7 August, 2024; v1 submitted 24 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Random Scaling and Momentum for Non-smooth Non-convex Optimization

Authors: Qinzi Zhang, Ashok Cutkosky

Abstract: Training neural networks requires optimizing a loss function that may be highly irregular, and in particular neither convex nor smooth. Popular training algorithms are based on stochastic gradient descent with momentum (SGDM), for which classical analysis applies only if the loss is either convex or smooth. We show that a very small modification to SGDM closes this gap: simply scale the update at… ▽ More Training neural networks requires optimizing a loss function that may be highly irregular, and in particular neither convex nor smooth. Popular training algorithms are based on stochastic gradient descent with momentum (SGDM), for which classical analysis applies only if the loss is either convex or smooth. We show that a very small modification to SGDM closes this gap: simply scale the update at each time point by an exponentially distributed random scalar. The resulting algorithm achieves optimal convergence guarantees. Intriguingly, this result is not derived by a specific analysis of SGDM: instead, it falls naturally out of a more general framework for converting online convex optimization algorithms to non-convex optimization algorithms. △ Less

Submitted 15 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

When, Why and How Much? Adaptive Learning Rate Scheduling by Refinement

Authors: Aaron Defazio, Ashok Cutkosky, Harsh Mehta, Konstantin Mishchenko

Abstract: Learning rate schedules used in practice bear little resemblance to those recommended by theory. We close much of this theory/practice gap, and as a consequence are able to derive new problem-adaptive learning rate schedules. Our key technical contribution is a refined analysis of learning rate schedules for a wide class of optimization algorithms (including SGD). In contrast to most prior works t… ▽ More Learning rate schedules used in practice bear little resemblance to those recommended by theory. We close much of this theory/practice gap, and as a consequence are able to derive new problem-adaptive learning rate schedules. Our key technical contribution is a refined analysis of learning rate schedules for a wide class of optimization algorithms (including SGD). In contrast to most prior works that study the convergence of the average iterate, we study the last iterate, which is what most people use in practice. When considering only worst-case analysis, our theory predicts that the best choice is the linear decay schedule: a popular choice in practice that sets the stepsize proportionally to $1 - t/T$, where $t$ is the current iteration and $T$ is the total number of steps. To go beyond this worst-case analysis, we use the observed gradient norms to derive schedules refined for any particular task. These refined schedules exhibit learning rate warm-up and rapid learning rate annealing near the end of training. Ours is the first systematic approach to automatically yield both of these properties. We perform the most comprehensive evaluation of learning rate schedules to date, evaluating across 10 diverse deep learning problems, a series of LLMs, and a suite of logistic regression problems. We validate that overall, the linear-decay schedule matches or outperforms all commonly used default schedules including cosine annealing, and that our schedule refinement method gives further improvements. △ Less

Submitted 11 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Improving Adaptive Online Learning Using Refined Discretization

Authors: Zhiyu Zhang, Heng Yang, Ashok Cutkosky, Ioannis Ch. Paschalidis

Abstract: We study unconstrained Online Linear Optimization with Lipschitz losses. Motivated by the pursuit of instance optimality, we propose a new algorithm that simultaneously achieves ($i$) the AdaGrad-style second order gradient adaptivity; and ($ii$) the comparator norm adaptivity also known as "parameter freeness" in the literature. In particular, - our algorithm does not employ the impractical dou… ▽ More We study unconstrained Online Linear Optimization with Lipschitz losses. Motivated by the pursuit of instance optimality, we propose a new algorithm that simultaneously achieves ($i$) the AdaGrad-style second order gradient adaptivity; and ($ii$) the comparator norm adaptivity also known as "parameter freeness" in the literature. In particular, - our algorithm does not employ the impractical doubling trick, and does not require an a priori estimate of the time-uniform Lipschitz constant; - the associated regret bound has the optimal $O(\sqrt{V_T})$ dependence on the gradient variance $V_T$, without the typical logarithmic multiplicative factor; - the leading constant in the regret bound is "almost" optimal. Central to these results is a continuous time approach to online learning. We first show that the aimed simultaneous adaptivity can be achieved fairly easily in a continuous time analogue of the problem, where the environment is modeled by an arbitrary continuous semimartingale. Then, our key innovation is a new discretization argument that preserves such adaptivity in the discrete time adversarial setting. This refines a non-gradient-adaptive discretization argument from (Harvey et al., 2023), both algorithmically and analytically, which could be of independent interest. △ Less

Submitted 22 February, 2024; v1 submitted 27 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

Comments: ALT 2024

Unconstrained Online Learning with Unbounded Losses

Authors: Andrew Jacobsen, Ashok Cutkosky

Abstract: Algorithms for online learning typically require one or more boundedness assumptions: that the domain is bounded, that the losses are Lipschitz, or both. In this paper, we develop a new setting for online learning with unbounded domains and non-Lipschitz losses. For this setting we provide an algorithm which guarantees $R_{T}(u)\le \tilde O(G\|u\|\sqrt{T}+L\|u\|^{2}\sqrt{T})$ regret on any problem… ▽ More Algorithms for online learning typically require one or more boundedness assumptions: that the domain is bounded, that the losses are Lipschitz, or both. In this paper, we develop a new setting for online learning with unbounded domains and non-Lipschitz losses. For this setting we provide an algorithm which guarantees $R_{T}(u)\le \tilde O(G\|u\|\sqrt{T}+L\|u\|^{2}\sqrt{T})$ regret on any problem where the subgradients satisfy $\|g_{t}\|\le G+L\|w_{t}\|$, and show that this bound is unimprovable without further assumptions. We leverage this algorithm to develop new saddle-point optimization algorithms that converge in duality gap in unbounded domains, even in the absence of meaningful curvature. Finally, we provide the first algorithm achieving non-trivial dynamic regret in an unbounded domain for non-Lipschitz losses, as well as a matching lower bound. The regret of our dynamic regret algorithm automatically improves to a novel $L^{*}$ bound when the losses are smooth. △ Less

Submitted 14 July, 2023; v1 submitted 7 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Comments: 41 pages; ICML 2023; v2: fixed some details in the exposition introducing saddle-point problems

Mechanic: A Learning Rate Tuner

Authors: Ashok Cutkosky, Aaron Defazio, Harsh Mehta

Abstract: We introduce a technique for tuning the learning rate scale factor of any base optimization algorithm and schedule automatically, which we call \textsc{mechanic}. Our method provides a practical realization of recent theoretical reductions for accomplishing a similar goal in online convex optimization. We rigorously evaluate \textsc{mechanic} on a range of large scale deep learning tasks with vary… ▽ More We introduce a technique for tuning the learning rate scale factor of any base optimization algorithm and schedule automatically, which we call \textsc{mechanic}. Our method provides a practical realization of recent theoretical reductions for accomplishing a similar goal in online convex optimization. We rigorously evaluate \textsc{mechanic} on a range of large scale deep learning tasks with varying batch sizes, schedules, and base optimization algorithms. These experiments demonstrate that depending on the problem, \textsc{mechanic} either comes very close to, matches or even improves upon manual tuning of learning rates. △ Less

Submitted 1 June, 2023; v1 submitted 31 May, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Optimal Stochastic Non-smooth Non-convex Optimization through Online-to-Non-convex Conversion

Authors: Ashok Cutkosky, Harsh Mehta, Francesco Orabona

Abstract: We present new algorithms for optimizing non-smooth, non-convex stochastic objectives based on a novel analysis technique. This improves the current best-known complexity for finding a $(δ,ε)$-stationary point from $O(ε^{-4}δ^{-1})$ stochastic gradient queries to $O(ε^{-3}δ^{-1})$, which we also show to be optimal. Our primary technique is a reduction from non-smooth non-convex optimization to onl… ▽ More We present new algorithms for optimizing non-smooth, non-convex stochastic objectives based on a novel analysis technique. This improves the current best-known complexity for finding a $(δ,ε)$-stationary point from $O(ε^{-4}δ^{-1})$ stochastic gradient queries to $O(ε^{-3}δ^{-1})$, which we also show to be optimal. Our primary technique is a reduction from non-smooth non-convex optimization to online learning, after which our results follow from standard regret bounds in online learning. For deterministic and second-order smooth objectives, applying more advanced optimistic online learning techniques enables a new complexity of $O(ε^{-1.5}δ^{-0.5})$. Our techniques also recover all optimal or best-known results for finding $ε$ stationary points of smooth or second-order smooth objectives in both stochastic and deterministic settings. △ Less

Submitted 11 February, 2023; v1 submitted 7 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

Unconstrained Dynamic Regret via Sparse Coding

Authors: Zhiyu Zhang, Ashok Cutkosky, Ioannis Ch. Paschalidis

Abstract: Motivated by the challenge of nonstationarity in sequential decision making, we study Online Convex Optimization (OCO) under the coupling of two problem structures: the domain is unbounded, and the comparator sequence $u_1,\ldots,u_T$ is arbitrarily time-varying. As no algorithm can guarantee low regret simultaneously against all comparator sequences, handling this setting requires moving from min… ▽ More Motivated by the challenge of nonstationarity in sequential decision making, we study Online Convex Optimization (OCO) under the coupling of two problem structures: the domain is unbounded, and the comparator sequence $u_1,\ldots,u_T$ is arbitrarily time-varying. As no algorithm can guarantee low regret simultaneously against all comparator sequences, handling this setting requires moving from minimax optimality to comparator adaptivity. That is, sensible regret bounds should depend on certain complexity measures of the comparator relative to one's prior knowledge. This paper achieves a new type of these adaptive regret bounds via a sparse coding framework. The complexity of the comparator is measured by its energy and its sparsity on a user-specified dictionary, which offers considerable versatility. Equipped with a wavelet dictionary for example, our framework improves the state-of-the-art bound (Jacobsen & Cutkosky, 2022) by adapting to both ($i$) the magnitude of the comparator average $||\bar u||=||\sum_{t=1}^Tu_t/T||$, rather than the maximum $\max_t||u_t||$; and ($ii$) the comparator variability $\sum_{t=1}^T||u_t-\bar u||$, rather than the uncentered sum $\sum_{t=1}^T||u_t||$. Furthermore, our analysis is simpler due to decoupling function approximation from regret minimization. △ Less

Submitted 25 October, 2023; v1 submitted 30 January, 2023; originally announced January 2023.

Comments: NeurIPS 2023

Differentially Private Image Classification from Features

Authors: Harsh Mehta, Walid Krichene, Abhradeep Thakurta, Alexey Kurakin, Ashok Cutkosky

Abstract: Leveraging transfer learning has recently been shown to be an effective strategy for training large models with Differential Privacy (DP). Moreover, somewhat surprisingly, recent works have found that privately training just the last layer of a pre-trained model provides the best utility with DP. While past studies largely rely on algorithms like DP-SGD for training large models, in the specific c… ▽ More Leveraging transfer learning has recently been shown to be an effective strategy for training large models with Differential Privacy (DP). Moreover, somewhat surprisingly, recent works have found that privately training just the last layer of a pre-trained model provides the best utility with DP. While past studies largely rely on algorithms like DP-SGD for training large models, in the specific case of privately learning from features, we observe that computational burden is low enough to allow for more sophisticated optimization schemes, including second-order methods. To that end, we systematically explore the effect of design parameters such as loss function and optimization algorithm. We find that, while commonly used logistic regression performs better than linear regression in the non-private setting, the situation is reversed in the private setting. We find that linear regression is much more effective than logistic regression from both privacy and computational aspects, especially at stricter epsilon values ($ε< 1$). On the optimization side, we also explore using Newton's method, and find that second-order information is quite helpful even with privacy, although the benefit significantly diminishes with stricter privacy guarantees. While both methods use second-order information, least squares is effective at lower epsilons while Newton's method is effective at larger epsilon values. To combine the benefits of both, we propose a novel algorithm called DP-FC, which leverages feature covariance instead of the Hessian of the logistic regression loss and performs well across all $ε$ values we tried. With this, we obtain new SOTA results on ImageNet-1k, CIFAR-100 and CIFAR-10 across all values of $ε$ typically considered. Most remarkably, on ImageNet-1K, we obtain top-1 accuracy of 88\% under (8, $8 * 10^{-7}$)-DP and 84.3\% under (0.1, $8 * 10^{-7}$)-DP. △ Less

Submitted 23 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

Parameter-free Regret in High Probability with Heavy Tails

Authors: Jiujia Zhang, Ashok Cutkosky

Abstract: We present new algorithms for online convex optimization over unbounded domains that obtain parameter-free regret in high-probability given access only to potentially heavy-tailed subgradient estimates. Previous work in unbounded domains considers only in-expectation results for sub-exponential subgradients. Unlike in the bounded domain case, we cannot rely on straight-forward martingale concentra… ▽ More We present new algorithms for online convex optimization over unbounded domains that obtain parameter-free regret in high-probability given access only to potentially heavy-tailed subgradient estimates. Previous work in unbounded domains considers only in-expectation results for sub-exponential subgradients. Unlike in the bounded domain case, we cannot rely on straight-forward martingale concentration due to exponentially large iterates produced by the algorithm. We develop new regularization techniques to overcome these problems. Overall, with probability at most $δ$, for all comparators $\mathbf{u}$ our algorithm achieves regret $\tilde{O}(\| \mathbf{u} \| T^{1/\mathfrak{p}} \log (1/δ))$ for subgradients with bounded $\mathfrak{p}^{th}$ moments for some $\mathfrak{p} \in (1, 2]$. △ Less

Submitted 25 February, 2023; v1 submitted 25 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Differentially Private Online-to-Batch for Smooth Losses

Authors: Qinzi Zhang, Hoang Tran, Ashok Cutkosky

Abstract: We develop a new reduction that converts any online convex optimization algorithm suffering $O(\sqrt{T})$ regret into an $ε$-differentially private stochastic convex optimization algorithm with the optimal convergence rate $\tilde O(1/\sqrt{T} + \sqrt{d}/εT)$ on smooth losses in linear time, forming a direct analogy to the classical non-private "online-to-batch" conversion. By applying our techniq… ▽ More We develop a new reduction that converts any online convex optimization algorithm suffering $O(\sqrt{T})$ regret into an $ε$-differentially private stochastic convex optimization algorithm with the optimal convergence rate $\tilde O(1/\sqrt{T} + \sqrt{d}/εT)$ on smooth losses in linear time, forming a direct analogy to the classical non-private "online-to-batch" conversion. By applying our techniques to more advanced adaptive online algorithms, we produce adaptive differentially private counterparts whose convergence rates depend on apriori unknown variances or parameter norms. △ Less

Submitted 12 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Momentum Aggregation for Private Non-convex ERM

Authors: Hoang Tran, Ashok Cutkosky

Abstract: We introduce new algorithms and convergence guarantees for privacy-preserving non-convex Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) on smooth $d$-dimensional objectives. We develop an improved sensitivity analysis of stochastic gradient descent on smooth objectives that exploits the recurrence of examples in different epochs. By combining this new approach with recent analysis of momentum with private aggr… ▽ More We introduce new algorithms and convergence guarantees for privacy-preserving non-convex Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) on smooth $d$-dimensional objectives. We develop an improved sensitivity analysis of stochastic gradient descent on smooth objectives that exploits the recurrence of examples in different epochs. By combining this new approach with recent analysis of momentum with private aggregation techniques, we provide an $(ε,δ)$-differential private algorithm that finds a gradient of norm $\tilde O\left(\frac{d^{1/3}}{(εN)^{2/3}}\right)$ in $O\left(\frac{N^{7/3}ε^{4/3}}{d^{2/3}}\right)$ gradient evaluations, improving the previous best gradient bound of $\tilde O\left(\frac{d^{1/4}}{\sqrt{εN}}\right)$. △ Less

Submitted 12 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Long Range Language Modeling via Gated State Spaces

Authors: Harsh Mehta, Ankit Gupta, Ashok Cutkosky, Behnam Neyshabur

Abstract: State space models have shown to be effective at modeling long range dependencies, specially on sequence classification tasks. In this work we focus on autoregressive sequence modeling over English books, Github source code and ArXiv mathematics articles. Based on recent developments around the effectiveness of gated activation functions, we propose a new layer named Gated State Space (GSS) and sh… ▽ More State space models have shown to be effective at modeling long range dependencies, specially on sequence classification tasks. In this work we focus on autoregressive sequence modeling over English books, Github source code and ArXiv mathematics articles. Based on recent developments around the effectiveness of gated activation functions, we propose a new layer named Gated State Space (GSS) and show that it trains significantly faster than the diagonal version of S4 (i.e. DSS) on TPUs, is fairly competitive with several well-tuned Transformer-based baselines and exhibits zero-shot generalization to longer inputs while being straightforward to implement. Finally, we show that leveraging self-attention to model local dependencies improves the performance of GSS even further. △ Less

Submitted 2 July, 2022; v1 submitted 26 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Optimal Comparator Adaptive Online Learning with Switching Cost

Authors: Zhiyu Zhang, Ashok Cutkosky, Ioannis Ch. Paschalidis

Abstract: Practical online learning tasks are often naturally defined on unconstrained domains, where optimal algorithms for general convex losses are characterized by the notion of comparator adaptivity. In this paper, we design such algorithms in the presence of switching cost - the latter penalizes the typical optimism in adaptive algorithms, leading to a delicate design trade-off. Based on a novel dual… ▽ More Practical online learning tasks are often naturally defined on unconstrained domains, where optimal algorithms for general convex losses are characterized by the notion of comparator adaptivity. In this paper, we design such algorithms in the presence of switching cost - the latter penalizes the typical optimism in adaptive algorithms, leading to a delicate design trade-off. Based on a novel dual space scaling strategy discovered by a continuous-time analysis, we propose a simple algorithm that improves the existing comparator adaptive regret bound [ZCP22a] to the optimal rate. The obtained benefits are further extended to the expert setting, and the practicality of the proposed algorithm is demonstrated through a sequential investment task. △ Less

Submitted 11 October, 2022; v1 submitted 13 May, 2022; originally announced May 2022.

Comments: NeurIPS 2022

Large Scale Transfer Learning for Differentially Private Image Classification

Authors: Harsh Mehta, Abhradeep Thakurta, Alexey Kurakin, Ashok Cutkosky

Abstract: Differential Privacy (DP) provides a formal framework for training machine learning models with individual example level privacy. In the field of deep learning, Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) has emerged as a popular private training algorithm. Unfortunately, the computational cost of training large-scale models with DP-SGD is substantially higher than non-private trai… ▽ More Differential Privacy (DP) provides a formal framework for training machine learning models with individual example level privacy. In the field of deep learning, Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) has emerged as a popular private training algorithm. Unfortunately, the computational cost of training large-scale models with DP-SGD is substantially higher than non-private training. This is further exacerbated by the fact that increasing the number of parameters leads to larger degradation in utility with DP. In this work, we zoom in on the ImageNet dataset and demonstrate that, similar to the non-private case, pre-training over-parameterized models on a large public dataset can lead to substantial gains when the model is finetuned privately. Moreover, by systematically comparing private and non-private models across a range of large batch sizes, we find that similar to non-private setting, choice of optimizer can further improve performance substantially with DP. By using LAMB optimizer with DP-SGD we saw improvement of up to 20$\%$ points (absolute). Finally, we show that finetuning just the last layer for a \emph{single step} in the full batch setting, combined with extremely small-scale (near-zero) initialization leads to both SOTA results of 81.7 $\%$ under a wide privacy budget range of $ε\in [4, 10]$ and $δ$ = $10^{-6}$ while minimizing the computational overhead substantially. △ Less

Submitted 20 May, 2022; v1 submitted 5 May, 2022; originally announced May 2022.

Implicit Parameter-free Online Learning with Truncated Linear Models

Authors: Keyi Chen, Ashok Cutkosky, Francesco Orabona

Abstract: Parameter-free algorithms are online learning algorithms that do not require setting learning rates. They achieve optimal regret with respect to the distance between the initial point and any competitor. Yet, parameter-free algorithms do not take into account the geometry of the losses. Recently, in the stochastic optimization literature, it has been proposed to instead use truncated linear lower… ▽ More Parameter-free algorithms are online learning algorithms that do not require setting learning rates. They achieve optimal regret with respect to the distance between the initial point and any competitor. Yet, parameter-free algorithms do not take into account the geometry of the losses. Recently, in the stochastic optimization literature, it has been proposed to instead use truncated linear lower bounds, which produce better performance by more closely modeling the losses. In particular, truncated linear models greatly reduce the problem of overshooting the minimum of the loss function. Unfortunately, truncated linear models cannot be used with parameter-free algorithms because the updates become very expensive to compute. In this paper, we propose new parameter-free algorithms that can take advantage of truncated linear models through a new update that has an "implicit" flavor. Based on a novel decomposition of the regret, the new update is efficient, requires only one gradient at each step, never overshoots the minimum of the truncated model, and retains the favorable parameter-free properties. We also conduct an empirical study demonstrating the practical utility of our algorithms. △ Less

Submitted 19 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

Leveraging Initial Hints for Free in Stochastic Linear Bandits

Authors: Ashok Cutkosky, Chris Dann, Abhimanyu Das, Qiuyi, Zhang

Abstract: We study the setting of optimizing with bandit feedback with additional prior knowledge provided to the learner in the form of an initial hint of the optimal action. We present a novel algorithm for stochastic linear bandits that uses this hint to improve its regret to $\tilde O(\sqrt{T})$ when the hint is accurate, while maintaining a minimax-optimal $\tilde O(d\sqrt{T})$ regret independent of th… ▽ More We study the setting of optimizing with bandit feedback with additional prior knowledge provided to the learner in the form of an initial hint of the optimal action. We present a novel algorithm for stochastic linear bandits that uses this hint to improve its regret to $\tilde O(\sqrt{T})$ when the hint is accurate, while maintaining a minimax-optimal $\tilde O(d\sqrt{T})$ regret independent of the quality of the hint. Furthermore, we provide a Pareto frontier of tight tradeoffs between best-case and worst-case regret, with matching lower bounds. Perhaps surprisingly, our work shows that leveraging a hint shows provable gains without sacrificing worst-case performance, implying that our algorithm adapts to the quality of the hint for free. We also provide an extension of our algorithm to the case of $m$ initial hints, showing that we can achieve a $\tilde O(m^{2/3}\sqrt{T})$ regret. △ Less

Submitted 8 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

Comments: ALT 2022

Parameter-free Mirror Descent

Authors: Andrew Jacobsen, Ashok Cutkosky

Abstract: We develop a modified online mirror descent framework that is suitable for building adaptive and parameter-free algorithms in unbounded domains. We leverage this technique to develop the first unconstrained online linear optimization algorithm achieving an optimal dynamic regret bound, and we further demonstrate that natural strategies based on Follow-the-Regularized-Leader are unable to achieve s… ▽ More We develop a modified online mirror descent framework that is suitable for building adaptive and parameter-free algorithms in unbounded domains. We leverage this technique to develop the first unconstrained online linear optimization algorithm achieving an optimal dynamic regret bound, and we further demonstrate that natural strategies based on Follow-the-Regularized-Leader are unable to achieve similar results. We also apply our mirror descent framework to build new parameter-free implicit updates, as well as a simplified and improved unconstrained scale-free algorithm. △ Less

Submitted 8 February, 2024; v1 submitted 26 February, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

Comments: 59 pages. v4: Added a new section (7. Trade-offs in the Horizon Dependence) discussing how to achieve an alternative type of parameter-free bound using our framework; v3: published at COLT 2022 + fixed typos; v2: improved the algorithms in sections 3, 5, and 6 (tighter regret, simpler updates and analysis), corrected minor technical details and fixed typos

Understanding AdamW through Proximal Methods and Scale-Freeness

Authors: Zhenxun Zhuang, Mingrui Liu, Ashok Cutkosky, Francesco Orabona

Abstract: Adam has been widely adopted for training deep neural networks due to less hyperparameter tuning and remarkable performance. To improve generalization, Adam is typically used in tandem with a squared $\ell_2$ regularizer (referred to as Adam-$\ell_2$). However, even better performance can be obtained with AdamW, which decouples the gradient of the regularizer from the update rule of Adam-$\ell_2$.… ▽ More Adam has been widely adopted for training deep neural networks due to less hyperparameter tuning and remarkable performance. To improve generalization, Adam is typically used in tandem with a squared $\ell_2$ regularizer (referred to as Adam-$\ell_2$). However, even better performance can be obtained with AdamW, which decouples the gradient of the regularizer from the update rule of Adam-$\ell_2$. Yet, we are still lacking a complete explanation of the advantages of AdamW. In this paper, we tackle this question from both an optimization and an empirical point of view. First, we show how to re-interpret AdamW as an approximation of a proximal gradient method, which takes advantage of the closed-form proximal mapping of the regularizer instead of only utilizing its gradient information as in Adam-$\ell_2$. Next, we consider the property of "scale-freeness" enjoyed by AdamW and by its proximal counterpart: their updates are invariant to component-wise rescaling of the gradients. We provide empirical evidence across a wide range of deep learning experiments showing a correlation between the problems in which AdamW exhibits an advantage over Adam-$\ell_2$ and the degree to which we expect the gradients of the network to exhibit multiple scales, thus motivating the hypothesis that the advantage of AdamW could be due to the scale-free updates. △ Less

Submitted 31 January, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

PDE-Based Optimal Strategy for Unconstrained Online Learning

Authors: Zhiyu Zhang, Ashok Cutkosky, Ioannis Paschalidis

Abstract: Unconstrained Online Linear Optimization (OLO) is a practical problem setting to study the training of machine learning models. Existing works proposed a number of potential-based algorithms, but in general the design of these potential functions relies heavily on guessing. To streamline this workflow, we present a framework that generates new potential functions by solving a Partial Differential… ▽ More Unconstrained Online Linear Optimization (OLO) is a practical problem setting to study the training of machine learning models. Existing works proposed a number of potential-based algorithms, but in general the design of these potential functions relies heavily on guessing. To streamline this workflow, we present a framework that generates new potential functions by solving a Partial Differential Equation (PDE). Specifically, when losses are 1-Lipschitz, our framework produces a novel algorithm with anytime regret bound $C\sqrt{T}+||u||\sqrt{2T}[\sqrt{\log(1+||u||/C)}+2]$, where $C$ is a user-specified constant and $u$ is any comparator unknown and unbounded a priori. Such a bound attains an optimal loss-regret trade-off without the impractical doubling trick. Moreover, a matching lower bound shows that the leading order term, including the constant multiplier $\sqrt{2}$, is tight. To our knowledge, the proposed algorithm is the first to achieve such optimalities. △ Less

Submitted 15 June, 2022; v1 submitted 19 January, 2022; originally announced January 2022.

Comments: ICML 2022

Logarithmic Regret from Sublinear Hints

Authors: Aditya Bhaskara, Ashok Cutkosky, Ravi Kumar, Manish Purohit

Abstract: We consider the online linear optimization problem, where at every step the algorithm plays a point $x_t$ in the unit ball, and suffers loss $\langle c_t, x_t\rangle$ for some cost vector $c_t$ that is then revealed to the algorithm. Recent work showed that if an algorithm receives a hint $h_t$ that has non-trivial correlation with $c_t$ before it plays $x_t$, then it can achieve a regret guarante… ▽ More We consider the online linear optimization problem, where at every step the algorithm plays a point $x_t$ in the unit ball, and suffers loss $\langle c_t, x_t\rangle$ for some cost vector $c_t$ that is then revealed to the algorithm. Recent work showed that if an algorithm receives a hint $h_t$ that has non-trivial correlation with $c_t$ before it plays $x_t$, then it can achieve a regret guarantee of $O(\log T)$, improving on the bound of $Θ(\sqrt{T})$ in the standard setting. In this work, we study the question of whether an algorithm really requires a hint at every time step. Somewhat surprisingly, we show that an algorithm can obtain $O(\log T)$ regret with just $O(\sqrt{T})$ hints under a natural query model; in contrast, we also show that $o(\sqrt{T})$ hints cannot guarantee better than $Ω(\sqrt{T})$ regret. We give two applications of our result, to the well-studied setting of optimistic regret bounds and to the problem of online learning with abstention. △ Less

Submitted 9 November, 2021; originally announced November 2021.

Online Selective Classification with Limited Feedback

Authors: Aditya Gangrade, Anil Kag, Ashok Cutkosky, Venkatesh Saligrama

Abstract: Motivated by applications to resource-limited and safety-critical domains, we study selective classification in the online learning model, wherein a predictor may abstain from classifying an instance. For example, this may model an adaptive decision to invoke more resources on this instance. Two salient aspects of the setting we consider are that the data may be non-realisable, due to which absten… ▽ More Motivated by applications to resource-limited and safety-critical domains, we study selective classification in the online learning model, wherein a predictor may abstain from classifying an instance. For example, this may model an adaptive decision to invoke more resources on this instance. Two salient aspects of the setting we consider are that the data may be non-realisable, due to which abstention may be a valid long-term action, and that feedback is only received when the learner abstains, which models the fact that reliable labels are only available when the resource intensive processing is invoked. Within this framework, we explore strategies that make few mistakes, while not abstaining too many times more than the best-in-hindsight error-free classifier from a given class. That is, the one that makes no mistakes, while abstaining the fewest number of times. We construct simple versioning-based schemes for any $μ\in (0,1],$ that make most $T^μ$ mistakes while incurring \smash{$\tilde{O}(T^{1-μ})$} excess abstention against adaptive adversaries. We further show that this dependence on $T$ is tight, and provide illustrative experiments on realistic datasets. △ Less

Submitted 27 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Comments: To appear at NeurIPS 2021

High-probability Bounds for Non-Convex Stochastic Optimization with Heavy Tails

Authors: Ashok Cutkosky, Harsh Mehta

Abstract: We consider non-convex stochastic optimization using first-order algorithms for which the gradient estimates may have heavy tails. We show that a combination of gradient clipping, momentum, and normalized gradient descent yields convergence to critical points in high-probability with best-known rates for smooth losses when the gradients only have bounded $\mathfrak{p}$th moments for some… ▽ More We consider non-convex stochastic optimization using first-order algorithms for which the gradient estimates may have heavy tails. We show that a combination of gradient clipping, momentum, and normalized gradient descent yields convergence to critical points in high-probability with best-known rates for smooth losses when the gradients only have bounded $\mathfrak{p}$th moments for some $\mathfrak{p}\in(1,2]$. We then consider the case of second-order smooth losses, which to our knowledge have not been studied in this setting, and again obtain high-probability bounds for any $\mathfrak{p}$. Moreover, our results hold for arbitrary smooth norms, in contrast to the typical SGD analysis which requires a Hilbert space norm. Further, we show that after a suitable "burn-in" period, the objective value will monotonically decrease for every iteration until a critical point is identified, which provides intuition behind the popular practice of learning rate "warm-up" and also yields a last-iterate guarantee. △ Less

Submitted 9 November, 2021; v1 submitted 27 June, 2021; originally announced June 2021.

Better SGD using Second-order Momentum

Authors: Hoang Tran, Ashok Cutkosky

Abstract: We develop a new algorithm for non-convex stochastic optimization that finds an $ε$-critical point in the optimal $O(ε^{-3})$ stochastic gradient and Hessian-vector product computations. Our algorithm uses Hessian-vector products to "correct" a bias term in the momentum of SGD with momentum. This leads to better gradient estimates in a manner analogous to variance reduction methods. In contrast to… ▽ More We develop a new algorithm for non-convex stochastic optimization that finds an $ε$-critical point in the optimal $O(ε^{-3})$ stochastic gradient and Hessian-vector product computations. Our algorithm uses Hessian-vector products to "correct" a bias term in the momentum of SGD with momentum. This leads to better gradient estimates in a manner analogous to variance reduction methods. In contrast to prior work, we do not require excessively large batch sizes, and are able to provide an adaptive algorithm whose convergence rate automatically improves with decreasing variance in the gradient estimates. We validate our results on a variety of large-scale deep learning architectures and benchmarks tasks. △ Less

Submitted 11 July, 2021; v1 submitted 4 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

Adversarial Tracking Control via Strongly Adaptive Online Learning with Memory

Authors: Zhiyu Zhang, Ashok Cutkosky, Ioannis Ch. Paschalidis

Abstract: We consider the problem of tracking an adversarial state sequence in a linear dynamical system subject to adversarial disturbances and loss functions, generalizing earlier settings in the literature. To this end, we develop three techniques, each of independent interest. First, we propose a comparator-adaptive algorithm for online linear optimization with movement cost. Without tuning, it nearly m… ▽ More We consider the problem of tracking an adversarial state sequence in a linear dynamical system subject to adversarial disturbances and loss functions, generalizing earlier settings in the literature. To this end, we develop three techniques, each of independent interest. First, we propose a comparator-adaptive algorithm for online linear optimization with movement cost. Without tuning, it nearly matches the performance of the optimally tuned gradient descent in hindsight. Next, considering a related problem called online learning with memory, we construct a novel strongly adaptive algorithm that uses our first contribution as a building block. Finally, we present the first reduction from adversarial tracking control to strongly adaptive online learning with memory. Summarizing these individual techniques, we obtain an adversarial tracking controller with a strong performance guarantee even when the reference trajectory has a large range of movement. △ Less

Submitted 21 February, 2022; v1 submitted 2 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

Comments: AISTATS 2022

Upper Confidence Bounds for Combining Stochastic Bandits

Authors: Ashok Cutkosky, Abhimanyu Das, Manish Purohit

Abstract: We provide a simple method to combine stochastic bandit algorithms. Our approach is based on a "meta-UCB" procedure that treats each of $N$ individual bandit algorithms as arms in a higher-level $N$-armed bandit problem that we solve with a variant of the classic UCB algorithm. Our final regret depends only on the regret of the base algorithm with the best regret in hindsight. This approach provid… ▽ More We provide a simple method to combine stochastic bandit algorithms. Our approach is based on a "meta-UCB" procedure that treats each of $N$ individual bandit algorithms as arms in a higher-level $N$-armed bandit problem that we solve with a variant of the classic UCB algorithm. Our final regret depends only on the regret of the base algorithm with the best regret in hindsight. This approach provides an easy and intuitive alternative strategy to the CORRAL algorithm for adversarial bandits, without requiring the stability conditions imposed by CORRAL on the base algorithms. Our results match lower bounds in several settings, and we provide empirical validation of our algorithm on misspecified linear bandit and model selection problems. △ Less

Submitted 24 December, 2020; originally announced December 2020.

Online Linear Optimization with Many Hints

Authors: Aditya Bhaskara, Ashok Cutkosky, Ravi Kumar, Manish Purohit

Abstract: We study an online linear optimization (OLO) problem in which the learner is provided access to $K$ "hint" vectors in each round prior to making a decision. In this setting, we devise an algorithm that obtains logarithmic regret whenever there exists a convex combination of the $K$ hints that has positive correlation with the cost vectors. This significantly extends prior work that considered only… ▽ More We study an online linear optimization (OLO) problem in which the learner is provided access to $K$ "hint" vectors in each round prior to making a decision. In this setting, we devise an algorithm that obtains logarithmic regret whenever there exists a convex combination of the $K$ hints that has positive correlation with the cost vectors. This significantly extends prior work that considered only the case $K=1$. To accomplish this, we develop a way to combine many arbitrary OLO algorithms to obtain regret only a logarithmically worse factor than the minimum regret of the original algorithms in hindsight; this result is of independent interest. △ Less

Submitted 6 October, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

Comments: Accepted at Neurips 2020

Extreme Memorization via Scale of Initialization

Authors: Harsh Mehta, Ashok Cutkosky, Behnam Neyshabur

Abstract: We construct an experimental setup in which changing the scale of initialization strongly impacts the implicit regularization induced by SGD, interpolating from good generalization performance to completely memorizing the training set while making little progress on the test set. Moreover, we find that the extent and manner in which generalization ability is affected depends on the activation and… ▽ More We construct an experimental setup in which changing the scale of initialization strongly impacts the implicit regularization induced by SGD, interpolating from good generalization performance to completely memorizing the training set while making little progress on the test set. Moreover, we find that the extent and manner in which generalization ability is affected depends on the activation and loss function used, with $\sin$ activation demonstrating extreme memorization. In the case of the homogeneous ReLU activation, we show that this behavior can be attributed to the loss function. Our empirical investigation reveals that increasing the scale of initialization correlates with misalignment of representations and gradients across examples in the same class. This insight allows us to devise an alignment measure over gradients and representations which can capture this phenomenon. We demonstrate that our alignment measure correlates with generalization of deep models trained on image classification tasks. △ Less

Submitted 1 May, 2021; v1 submitted 31 August, 2020; originally announced August 2020.

Comparator-adaptive Convex Bandits

Authors: Dirk van der Hoeven, Ashok Cutkosky, Haipeng Luo

Abstract: We study bandit convex optimization methods that adapt to the norm of the comparator, a topic that has only been studied before for its full-information counterpart. Specifically, we develop convex bandit algorithms with regret bounds that are small whenever the norm of the comparator is small. We first use techniques from the full-information setting to develop comparator-adaptive algorithms for… ▽ More We study bandit convex optimization methods that adapt to the norm of the comparator, a topic that has only been studied before for its full-information counterpart. Specifically, we develop convex bandit algorithms with regret bounds that are small whenever the norm of the comparator is small. We first use techniques from the full-information setting to develop comparator-adaptive algorithms for linear bandits. Then, we extend the ideas to convex bandits with Lipschitz or smooth loss functions, using a new single-point gradient estimator and carefully designed surrogate losses. △ Less

Submitted 16 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

Comments: 15 pages

Online Learning with Imperfect Hints

Authors: Aditya Bhaskara, Ashok Cutkosky, Ravi Kumar, Manish Purohit

Abstract: We consider a variant of the classical online linear optimization problem in which at every step, the online player receives a "hint" vector before choosing the action for that round. Rather surprisingly, it was shown that if the hint vector is guaranteed to have a positive correlation with the cost vector, then the online player can achieve a regret of $O(\log T)$, thus significantly improving ov… ▽ More We consider a variant of the classical online linear optimization problem in which at every step, the online player receives a "hint" vector before choosing the action for that round. Rather surprisingly, it was shown that if the hint vector is guaranteed to have a positive correlation with the cost vector, then the online player can achieve a regret of $O(\log T)$, thus significantly improving over the $O(\sqrt{T})$ regret in the general setting. However, the result and analysis require the correlation property at \emph{all} time steps, thus raising the natural question: can we design online learning algorithms that are resilient to bad hints? In this paper we develop algorithms and nearly matching lower bounds for online learning with imperfect directional hints. Our algorithms are oblivious to the quality of the hints, and the regret bounds interpolate between the always-correlated hints case and the no-hints case. Our results also generalize, simplify, and improve upon previous results on optimistic regret bounds, which can be viewed as an additive version of hints. △ Less

Submitted 2 October, 2020; v1 submitted 11 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

Comments: appeared in ICML 2020

Adaptive Online Learning with Varying Norms

Authors: Ashok Cutkosky

Abstract: Given any increasing sequence of norms $\|\cdot\|_0,\dots,\|\cdot\|_{T-1}$, we provide an online convex optimization algorithm that outputs points $w_t$ in some domain $W$ in response to convex losses $\ell_t:W\to \mathbb{R}$ that guarantees regret $R_T(u)=\sum_{t=1}^T \ell_t(w_t)-\ell_t(u)\le \tilde O\left(\|u\|_{T-1}\sqrt{\sum_{t=1}^T \|g_t\|_{t-1,\star}^2}\right)$ where $g_t$ is a subgradient o… ▽ More Given any increasing sequence of norms $\|\cdot\|_0,\dots,\|\cdot\|_{T-1}$, we provide an online convex optimization algorithm that outputs points $w_t$ in some domain $W$ in response to convex losses $\ell_t:W\to \mathbb{R}$ that guarantees regret $R_T(u)=\sum_{t=1}^T \ell_t(w_t)-\ell_t(u)\le \tilde O\left(\|u\|_{T-1}\sqrt{\sum_{t=1}^T \|g_t\|_{t-1,\star}^2}\right)$ where $g_t$ is a subgradient of $\ell_t$ at $w_t$. Our method does not require tuning to the value of $u$ and allows for arbitrary convex $W$. We apply this result to obtain new "full-matrix"-style regret bounds. Along the way, we provide a new examination of the full-matrix AdaGrad algorithm, suggesting a better learning rate value that improves significantly upon prior analysis. We use our new techniques to tune AdaGrad on-the-fly, realizing our improved bound in a concrete algorithm. △ Less

Submitted 10 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

Momentum Improves Normalized SGD

Authors: Ashok Cutkosky, Harsh Mehta

Abstract: We provide an improved analysis of normalized SGD showing that adding momentum provably removes the need for large batch sizes on non-convex objectives. Then, we consider the case of objectives with bounded second derivative and show that in this case a small tweak to the momentum formula allows normalized SGD with momentum to find an $ε$-critical point in $O(1/ε^{3.5})$ iterations, matching the b… ▽ More We provide an improved analysis of normalized SGD showing that adding momentum provably removes the need for large batch sizes on non-convex objectives. Then, we consider the case of objectives with bounded second derivative and show that in this case a small tweak to the momentum formula allows normalized SGD with momentum to find an $ε$-critical point in $O(1/ε^{3.5})$ iterations, matching the best-known rates without accruing any logarithmic factors or dependence on dimension. We also provide an adaptive method that automatically improves convergence rates when the variance in the gradients is small. Finally, we show that our method is effective when employed on popular large scale tasks such as ResNet-50 and BERT pretraining, matching the performance of the disparate methods used to get state-of-the-art results on both tasks. △ Less

Submitted 16 May, 2020; v1 submitted 9 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

Matrix-Free Preconditioning in Online Learning

Authors: Ashok Cutkosky, Tamas Sarlos

Abstract: We provide an online convex optimization algorithm with regret that interpolates between the regret of an algorithm using an optimal preconditioning matrix and one using a diagonal preconditioning matrix. Our regret bound is never worse than that obtained by diagonal preconditioning, and in certain setting even surpasses that of algorithms with full-matrix preconditioning. Importantly, our algorit… ▽ More We provide an online convex optimization algorithm with regret that interpolates between the regret of an algorithm using an optimal preconditioning matrix and one using a diagonal preconditioning matrix. Our regret bound is never worse than that obtained by diagonal preconditioning, and in certain setting even surpasses that of algorithms with full-matrix preconditioning. Importantly, our algorithm runs in the same time and space complexity as online gradient descent. Along the way we incorporate new techniques that mildly streamline and improve logarithmic factors in prior regret analyses. We conclude by benchmarking our algorithm on synthetic data and deep learning tasks. △ Less

Submitted 29 May, 2019; originally announced May 2019.

Comments: ICML 2019

Kernel Truncated Randomized Ridge Regression: Optimal Rates and Low Noise Acceleration

Authors: Kwang-Sung Jun, Ashok Cutkosky, Francesco Orabona

Abstract: In this paper, we consider the nonparametric least square regression in a Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space (RKHS). We propose a new randomized algorithm that has optimal generalization error bounds with respect to the square loss, closing a long-standing gap between upper and lower bounds. Moreover, we show that our algorithm has faster finite-time and asymptotic rates on problems where the Bayes… ▽ More In this paper, we consider the nonparametric least square regression in a Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space (RKHS). We propose a new randomized algorithm that has optimal generalization error bounds with respect to the square loss, closing a long-standing gap between upper and lower bounds. Moreover, we show that our algorithm has faster finite-time and asymptotic rates on problems where the Bayes risk with respect to the square loss is small. We state our results using standard tools from the theory of least square regression in RKHSs, namely, the decay of the eigenvalues of the associated integral operator and the complexity of the optimal predictor measured through the integral operator. △ Less

Submitted 25 May, 2019; originally announced May 2019.

Momentum-Based Variance Reduction in Non-Convex SGD

Authors: Ashok Cutkosky, Francesco Orabona

Abstract: Variance reduction has emerged in recent years as a strong competitor to stochastic gradient descent in non-convex problems, providing the first algorithms to improve upon the converge rate of stochastic gradient descent for finding first-order critical points. However, variance reduction techniques typically require carefully tuned learning rates and willingness to use excessively large "mega-bat… ▽ More Variance reduction has emerged in recent years as a strong competitor to stochastic gradient descent in non-convex problems, providing the first algorithms to improve upon the converge rate of stochastic gradient descent for finding first-order critical points. However, variance reduction techniques typically require carefully tuned learning rates and willingness to use excessively large "mega-batches" in order to achieve their improved results. We present a new algorithm, STORM, that does not require any batches and makes use of adaptive learning rates, enabling simpler implementation and less hyperparameter tuning. Our technique for removing the batches uses a variant of momentum to achieve variance reduction in non-convex optimization. On smooth losses $F$, STORM finds a point $\boldsymbol{x}$ with $\mathbb{E}[\|\nabla F(\boldsymbol{x})\|]\le O(1/\sqrt{T}+σ^{1/3}/T^{1/3})$ in $T$ iterations with $σ^2$ variance in the gradients, matching the optimal rate but without requiring knowledge of $σ$. △ Less

Submitted 21 April, 2020; v1 submitted 23 May, 2019; originally announced May 2019.

Comments: Added Ack

Anytime Online-to-Batch Conversions, Optimism, and Acceleration

Authors: Ashok Cutkosky

Abstract: A standard way to obtain convergence guarantees in stochastic convex optimization is to run an online learning algorithm and then output the average of its iterates: the actual iterates of the online learning algorithm do not come with individual guarantees. We close this gap by introducing a black-box modification to any online learning algorithm whose iterates converge to the optimum in stochast… ▽ More A standard way to obtain convergence guarantees in stochastic convex optimization is to run an online learning algorithm and then output the average of its iterates: the actual iterates of the online learning algorithm do not come with individual guarantees. We close this gap by introducing a black-box modification to any online learning algorithm whose iterates converge to the optimum in stochastic scenarios. We then consider the case of smooth losses, and show that combining our approach with optimistic online learning algorithms immediately yields a fast convergence rate of $O(L/T^{3/2}+σ/\sqrt{T})$ on $L$-smooth problems with $σ^2$ variance in the gradients. Finally, we provide a reduction that converts any adaptive online algorithm into one that obtains the optimal accelerated rate of $\tilde O(L/T^2 + σ/\sqrt{T})$, while still maintaining $\tilde O(1/\sqrt{T})$ convergence in the non-smooth setting. Importantly, our algorithms adapt to $L$ and $σ$ automatically: they do not need to know either to obtain these rates. △ Less

Submitted 3 March, 2019; originally announced March 2019.

Artificial Constraints and Lipschitz Hints for Unconstrained Online Learning

Authors: Ashok Cutkosky

Abstract: We provide algorithms that guarantee regret $R_T(u)\le \tilde O(G\|u\|^3 + G(\|u\|+1)\sqrt{T})$ or $R_T(u)\le \tilde O(G\|u\|^3T^{1/3} + GT^{1/3}+ G\|u\|\sqrt{T})$ for online convex optimization with $G$-Lipschitz losses for any comparison point $u$ without prior knowledge of either $G$ or $\|u\|$. Previous algorithms dispense with the $O(\|u\|^3)$ term at the expense of knowledge of one or both o… ▽ More We provide algorithms that guarantee regret $R_T(u)\le \tilde O(G\|u\|^3 + G(\|u\|+1)\sqrt{T})$ or $R_T(u)\le \tilde O(G\|u\|^3T^{1/3} + GT^{1/3}+ G\|u\|\sqrt{T})$ for online convex optimization with $G$-Lipschitz losses for any comparison point $u$ without prior knowledge of either $G$ or $\|u\|$. Previous algorithms dispense with the $O(\|u\|^3)$ term at the expense of knowledge of one or both of these parameters, while a lower bound shows that some additional penalty term over $G\|u\|\sqrt{T}$ is necessary. Previous penalties were exponential while our bounds are polynomial in all quantities. Further, given a known bound $\|u\|\le D$, our same techniques allow us to design algorithms that adapt optimally to the unknown value of $\|u\|$ without requiring knowledge of $G$. △ Less

Submitted 24 February, 2019; originally announced February 2019.

Combining Online Learning Guarantees

Authors: Ashok Cutkosky

Abstract: We show how to take any two parameter-free online learning algorithms with different regret guarantees and obtain a single algorithm whose regret is the minimum of the two base algorithms. Our method is embarrassingly simple: just add the iterates. This trick can generate efficient algorithms that adapt to many norms simultaneously, as well as providing diagonal-style algorithms that still maintai… ▽ More We show how to take any two parameter-free online learning algorithms with different regret guarantees and obtain a single algorithm whose regret is the minimum of the two base algorithms. Our method is embarrassingly simple: just add the iterates. This trick can generate efficient algorithms that adapt to many norms simultaneously, as well as providing diagonal-style algorithms that still maintain dimension-free guarantees. We then proceed to show how a variant on this idea yields a black-box procedure for generating optimistic online learning algorithms. This yields the first optimistic regret guarantees in the unconstrained setting and generically increases adaptivity. Further, our optimistic algorithms are guaranteed to do no worse than their non-optimistic counterparts regardless of the quality of the optimistic estimates provided to the algorithm. △ Less

Submitted 24 February, 2019; originally announced February 2019.

Surrogate Losses for Online Learning of Stepsizes in Stochastic Non-Convex Optimization

Authors: Zhenxun Zhuang, Ashok Cutkosky, Francesco Orabona

Abstract: Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) has played a central role in machine learning. However, it requires a carefully hand-picked stepsize for fast convergence, which is notoriously tedious and time-consuming to tune. Over the last several years, a plethora of adaptive gradient-based algorithms have emerged to ameliorate this problem. They have proved efficient in reducing the labor of tuning in pract… ▽ More Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) has played a central role in machine learning. However, it requires a carefully hand-picked stepsize for fast convergence, which is notoriously tedious and time-consuming to tune. Over the last several years, a plethora of adaptive gradient-based algorithms have emerged to ameliorate this problem. They have proved efficient in reducing the labor of tuning in practice, but many of them lack theoretic guarantees even in the convex setting. In this paper, we propose new surrogate losses to cast the problem of learning the optimal stepsizes for the stochastic optimization of a non-convex smooth objective function onto an online convex optimization problem. This allows the use of no-regret online algorithms to compute optimal stepsizes on the fly. In turn, this results in a SGD algorithm with self-tuned stepsizes that guarantees convergence rates that are automatically adaptive to the level of noise. △ Less

Submitted 7 June, 2019; v1 submitted 25 January, 2019; originally announced January 2019.

Black-Box Reductions for Parameter-free Online Learning in Banach Spaces

Authors: Ashok Cutkosky, Francesco Orabona

Abstract: We introduce several new black-box reductions that significantly improve the design of adaptive and parameter-free online learning algorithms by simplifying analysis, improving regret guarantees, and sometimes even improving runtime. We reduce parameter-free online learning to online exp-concave optimization, we reduce optimization in a Banach space to one-dimensional optimization, and we reduce o… ▽ More We introduce several new black-box reductions that significantly improve the design of adaptive and parameter-free online learning algorithms by simplifying analysis, improving regret guarantees, and sometimes even improving runtime. We reduce parameter-free online learning to online exp-concave optimization, we reduce optimization in a Banach space to one-dimensional optimization, and we reduce optimization over a constrained domain to unconstrained optimization. All of our reductions run as fast as online gradient descent. We use our new techniques to improve upon the previously best regret bounds for parameter-free learning, and do so for arbitrary norms. △ Less

Submitted 25 June, 2018; v1 submitted 17 February, 2018; originally announced February 2018.

Comments: Appears in Conference on Learning Theory 2018

Distributed Stochastic Optimization via Adaptive SGD

Authors: Ashok Cutkosky, Robert Busa-Fekete

Abstract: Stochastic convex optimization algorithms are the most popular way to train machine learning models on large-scale data. Scaling up the training process of these models is crucial, but the most popular algorithm, Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), is a serial method that is surprisingly hard to parallelize. In this paper, we propose an efficient distributed stochastic optimization method by combin… ▽ More Stochastic convex optimization algorithms are the most popular way to train machine learning models on large-scale data. Scaling up the training process of these models is crucial, but the most popular algorithm, Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), is a serial method that is surprisingly hard to parallelize. In this paper, we propose an efficient distributed stochastic optimization method by combining adaptivity with variance reduction techniques. Our analysis yields a linear speedup in the number of machines, constant memory footprint, and only a logarithmic number of communication rounds. Critically, our approach is a black-box reduction that parallelizes any serial online learning algorithm, streamlining prior analysis and allowing us to leverage the significant progress that has been made in designing adaptive algorithms. In particular, we achieve optimal convergence rates without any prior knowledge of smoothness parameters, yielding a more robust algorithm that reduces the need for hyperparameter tuning. We implement our algorithm in the Spark distributed framework and exhibit dramatic performance gains on large-scale logistic regression problems. △ Less

Submitted 28 October, 2018; v1 submitted 15 February, 2018; originally announced February 2018.

Comments: NIPS 2018, 21 Pages

Online Learning Without Prior Information

Authors: Ashok Cutkosky, Kwabena Boahen

Abstract: The vast majority of optimization and online learning algorithms today require some prior information about the data (often in the form of bounds on gradients or on the optimal parameter value). When this information is not available, these algorithms require laborious manual tuning of various hyperparameters, motivating the search for algorithms that can adapt to the data with no prior informatio… ▽ More The vast majority of optimization and online learning algorithms today require some prior information about the data (often in the form of bounds on gradients or on the optimal parameter value). When this information is not available, these algorithms require laborious manual tuning of various hyperparameters, motivating the search for algorithms that can adapt to the data with no prior information. We describe a frontier of new lower bounds on the performance of such algorithms, reflecting a tradeoff between a term that depends on the optimal parameter value and a term that depends on the gradients' rate of growth. Further, we construct a family of algorithms whose performance matches any desired point on this frontier, which no previous algorithm reaches. △ Less

Submitted 5 June, 2017; v1 submitted 7 March, 2017; originally announced March 2017.

Comments: 12 pages main text; 35 pages total; COLT 2017

Online Convex Optimization with Unconstrained Domains and Losses

Authors: Ashok Cutkosky, Kwabena Boahen

Abstract: We propose an online convex optimization algorithm (RescaledExp) that achieves optimal regret in the unconstrained setting without prior knowledge of any bounds on the loss functions. We prove a lower bound showing an exponential separation between the regret of existing algorithms that require a known bound on the loss functions and any algorithm that does not require such knowledge. RescaledExp… ▽ More We propose an online convex optimization algorithm (RescaledExp) that achieves optimal regret in the unconstrained setting without prior knowledge of any bounds on the loss functions. We prove a lower bound showing an exponential separation between the regret of existing algorithms that require a known bound on the loss functions and any algorithm that does not require such knowledge. RescaledExp matches this lower bound asymptotically in the number of iterations. RescaledExp is naturally hyperparameter-free and we demonstrate empirically that it matches prior optimization algorithms that require hyperparameter optimization. △ Less

Submitted 7 March, 2017; originally announced March 2017.

Journal ref: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29 (2016) 748-756