Showing 1–16 of 16 results for author: Darais, D

KATch: A Fast Symbolic Verifier for NetKAT

Authors: Mark Moeller, Jules Jacobs, Olivier Savary Belanger, David Darais, Cole Schlesinger, Steffen Smolka, Nate Foster, Alexandra Silva

Abstract: We develop new data structures and algorithms for checking verification queries in NetKAT, a domain-specific language for specifying the behavior of network data planes. Our results extend the techniques obtained in prior work on symbolic automata and provide a framework for building efficient and scalable verification tools. We present KATch, an implementation of these ideas in Scala, featuring a… ▽ More We develop new data structures and algorithms for checking verification queries in NetKAT, a domain-specific language for specifying the behavior of network data planes. Our results extend the techniques obtained in prior work on symbolic automata and provide a framework for building efficient and scalable verification tools. We present KATch, an implementation of these ideas in Scala, featuring an extended set of NetKAT operators that are useful for expressing network-wide specifications, and a verification engine that constructs a bisimulation or generates a counter-example showing that none exists. We evaluate the performance of our implementation on real-world and synthetic benchmarks, verifying properties such as reachability and slice isolation, typically returning a result in well under a second, which is orders of magnitude faster than previous approaches. Our advancements underscore NetKAT's potential as a practical, declarative language for network specification and verification. △ Less

Submitted 21 June, 2024; v1 submitted 6 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

The 2010 Census Confidentiality Protections Failed, Here's How and Why

Authors: John M. Abowd, Tamara Adams, Robert Ashmead, David Darais, Sourya Dey, Simson L. Garfinkel, Nathan Goldschlag, Daniel Kifer, Philip Leclerc, Ethan Lew, Scott Moore, Rolando A. Rodríguez, Ramy N. Tadros, Lars Vilhuber

Abstract: Using only 34 published tables, we reconstruct five variables (census block, sex, age, race, and ethnicity) in the confidential 2010 Census person records. Using the 38-bin age variable tabulated at the census block level, at most 20.1% of reconstructed records can differ from their confidential source on even a single value for these five variables. Using only published data, an attacker can veri… ▽ More Using only 34 published tables, we reconstruct five variables (census block, sex, age, race, and ethnicity) in the confidential 2010 Census person records. Using the 38-bin age variable tabulated at the census block level, at most 20.1% of reconstructed records can differ from their confidential source on even a single value for these five variables. Using only published data, an attacker can verify that all records in 70% of all census blocks (97 million people) are perfectly reconstructed. The tabular publications in Summary File 1 thus have prohibited disclosure risk similar to the unreleased confidential microdata. Reidentification studies confirm that an attacker can, within blocks with perfect reconstruction accuracy, correctly infer the actual census response on race and ethnicity for 3.4 million vulnerable population uniques (persons with nonmodal characteristics) with 95% accuracy, the same precision as the confidential data achieve and far greater than statistical baselines. The flaw in the 2010 Census framework was the assumption that aggregation prevented accurate microdata reconstruction, justifying weaker disclosure limitation methods than were applied to 2010 Census public microdata. The framework used for 2020 Census publications defends against attacks that are based on reconstruction, as we also demonstrate here. Finally, we show that alternatives to the 2020 Census Disclosure Avoidance System with similar accuracy (enhanced swapping) also fail to protect confidentiality, and those that partially defend against reconstruction attacks (incomplete suppression implementations) destroy the primary statutory use case: data for redistricting all legislatures in the country in compliance with the 1965 Voting Rights Act. △ Less

Submitted 18 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

Symphony: Expressive Secure Multiparty Computation with Coordination

Authors: Ian Sweet, David Darais, David Heath, William Harris, Ryan Estes, Michael Hicks

Abstract: Context: Secure Multiparty Computation (MPC) refers to a family of cryptographic techniques where mutually untrusting parties may compute functions of their private inputs while revealing only the function output. Inquiry: It can be hard to program MPCs correctly and efficiently using existing languages and frameworks, especially when they require coordinating disparate computational roles. How… ▽ More Context: Secure Multiparty Computation (MPC) refers to a family of cryptographic techniques where mutually untrusting parties may compute functions of their private inputs while revealing only the function output. Inquiry: It can be hard to program MPCs correctly and efficiently using existing languages and frameworks, especially when they require coordinating disparate computational roles. How can we make this easier? Approach: We present Symphony, a new functional programming language for MPCs among two or more parties. Symphony starts from the single-instruction, multiple-data (SIMD) semantics of prior MPC languages, in which each party carries out symmetric responsibilities, and generalizes it using constructs that can coordinate many parties. Symphony introduces **first-class shares** and **first-class party sets** to provide unmatched language-level expressive power with high efficiency. Knowledge: Developing a core formal language called $λ$-Symphony, we prove that the intuitive, generalized SIMD view of a program coincides with its actual distributed semantics. Thus the programmer can reason about her programs by reading them from top to bottom, even though in reality the program runs in a coordinated fashion, distributed across many machines. We implemented a prototype interpreter for Symphony leveraging multiple cryptographic backends. With it we wrote a variety of MPC programs, finding that Symphony can express optimized protocols that other languages cannot, and that in general Symphony programs operate efficiently. [ full abstract at https://doi.org/10.22152/programming-journal.org/2023/7/14 ] △ Less

Submitted 20 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

Journal ref: The Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming, 2023, Vol. 7, Issue 3, Article 14

Backpropagation Clipping for Deep Learning with Differential Privacy

Authors: Timothy Stevens, Ivoline C. Ngong, David Darais, Calvin Hirsch, David Slater, Joseph P. Near

Abstract: We present backpropagation clipping, a novel variant of differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) for privacy-preserving deep learning. Our approach clips each trainable layer's inputs (during the forward pass) and its upstream gradients (during the backward pass) to ensure bounded global sensitivity for the layer's gradient; this combination replaces the gradient clipping step i… ▽ More We present backpropagation clipping, a novel variant of differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) for privacy-preserving deep learning. Our approach clips each trainable layer's inputs (during the forward pass) and its upstream gradients (during the backward pass) to ensure bounded global sensitivity for the layer's gradient; this combination replaces the gradient clipping step in existing DP-SGD variants. Our approach is simple to implement in existing deep learning frameworks. The results of our empirical evaluation demonstrate that backpropagation clipping provides higher accuracy at lower values for the privacy parameter $ε$ compared to previous work. We achieve 98.7% accuracy for MNIST with $ε= 0.07$ and 74% accuracy for CIFAR-10 with $ε= 3.64$. △ Less

Submitted 17 February, 2022; v1 submitted 10 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

Comments: We found a bug in our implementation code that invalidates our experimental results

Solo: A Lightweight Static Analysis for Differential Privacy

Authors: Chike Abuah, David Darais, Joseph P. Near

Abstract: All current approaches for statically enforcing differential privacy in higher order languages make use of either linear or relational refinement types. A barrier to adoption for these approaches is the lack of support for expressing these "fancy types" in mainstream programming languages. For example, no mainstream language supports relational refinement types, and although Rust and modern versio… ▽ More All current approaches for statically enforcing differential privacy in higher order languages make use of either linear or relational refinement types. A barrier to adoption for these approaches is the lack of support for expressing these "fancy types" in mainstream programming languages. For example, no mainstream language supports relational refinement types, and although Rust and modern versions of Haskell both employ some linear typing techniques, they are inadequate for embedding enforcement of differential privacy, which requires "full" linear types a la Girard. We propose a new type system that enforces differential privacy, avoids the use of linear and relational refinement types, and can be easily embedded in mainstream richly typed programming languages such as Scala, OCaml and Haskell. We demonstrate such an embedding in Haskell, demonstrate its expressiveness on case studies, and prove that our type-based enforcement of differential privacy is sound. △ Less

Submitted 13 October, 2021; v1 submitted 4 May, 2021; originally announced May 2021.

DDUO: General-Purpose Dynamic Analysis for Differential Privacy

Authors: Chike Abuah, Alex Silence, David Darais, Joe Near

Abstract: Differential privacy enables general statistical analysis of data with formal guarantees of privacy protection at the individual level. Tools that assist data analysts with utilizing differential privacy have frequently taken the form of programming languages and libraries. However, many existing programming languages designed for compositional verification of differential privacy impose significa… ▽ More Differential privacy enables general statistical analysis of data with formal guarantees of privacy protection at the individual level. Tools that assist data analysts with utilizing differential privacy have frequently taken the form of programming languages and libraries. However, many existing programming languages designed for compositional verification of differential privacy impose significant burden on the programmer (in the form of complex type annotations). Supplementary library support for privacy analysis built on top of existing general-purpose languages has been more usable, but incapable of pervasive end-to-end enforcement of sensitivity analysis and privacy composition. We introduce DDUO, a dynamic analysis for enforcing differential privacy. DDUO is usable by non-experts: its analysis is automatic and it requires no additional type annotations. DDUO can be implemented as a library for existing programming languages; we present a reference implementation in Python which features moderate runtime overheads on realistic workloads. We include support for several data types, distance metrics and operations which are commonly used in modern machine learning programs. We also provide initial support for tracking the sensitivity of data transformations in popular Python libraries for data analysis. We formalize the novel core of the DDUO system and prove it sound for sensitivity analysis via a logical relation for metric preservation. We also illustrate DDUO's usability and flexibility through various case studies which implement state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms. △ Less

Submitted 15 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

Contextual Linear Types for Differential Privacy

Authors: Matías Toro, David Darais, Chike Abuah, Joe Near, Damián Árquez, Federico Olmedo, Éric Tanter

Abstract: Language support for differentially-private programming is both crucial and delicate. While elaborate program logics can be very expressive, type-system based approaches using linear types tend to be more lightweight and amenable to automatic checking and inference, and in particular in the presence of higher-order programming. Since the seminal design of Fuzz, which is restricted to $ε$-different… ▽ More Language support for differentially-private programming is both crucial and delicate. While elaborate program logics can be very expressive, type-system based approaches using linear types tend to be more lightweight and amenable to automatic checking and inference, and in particular in the presence of higher-order programming. Since the seminal design of Fuzz, which is restricted to $ε$-differential privacy in its original design, significant progress has been made to support more advancedvariants of differential privacy, like($ε$,$δ$)-differential privacy. However, supporting these advanced privacy variants while also supporting higher-order programming in full has proven to be challenging. We present Jazz, a language and type system which uses linear types and latent contextual effects to support both advanced variants of differential privacy and higher-order programming. Latent contextual effects allow delaying the payment of effects for connectives such as products, sums and functions, yielding advantages in terms of precision of the analysis and annotation burden upon elimination, as well as modularity. We formalize the core of Jazz, prove it sound for privacy via a logical relation for metric preservation, and illustrate its expressive power through a number of case studies drawn from the recent differential privacy literature. △ Less

Submitted 1 March, 2023; v1 submitted 21 October, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

Comments: Published in Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS) 2023

DuetSGX: Differential Privacy with Secure Hardware

Authors: Phillip Nguyen, Alex Silence, David Darais, Joseph P. Near

Abstract: Differential privacy offers a formal privacy guarantee for individuals, but many deployments of differentially private systems require a trusted third party (the data curator). We propose DuetSGX, a system that uses secure hardware (Intel's SGX) to eliminate the need for a trusted data curator. Data owners submit encrypted data that can be decrypted only within a secure enclave running the DuetSGX… ▽ More Differential privacy offers a formal privacy guarantee for individuals, but many deployments of differentially private systems require a trusted third party (the data curator). We propose DuetSGX, a system that uses secure hardware (Intel's SGX) to eliminate the need for a trusted data curator. Data owners submit encrypted data that can be decrypted only within a secure enclave running the DuetSGX system, ensuring that sensitive data is never available to the data curator. Analysts submit queries written in the Duet language, which is specifically designed for verifying that programs satisfy differential privacy; DuetSGX uses the Duet typechecker to verify that each query satisfies differential privacy before running it. DuetSGX therefore provides the benefits of local differential privacy and central differential privacy simultaneously: noise is only added to final results, and there is no trusted third party. We have implemented a proof-of-concept implementation of DuetSGX and we release it as open-source. △ Less

Submitted 20 October, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

Duet: An Expressive Higher-order Language and Linear Type System for Statically Enforcing Differential Privacy

Authors: Joseph P. Near, David Darais, Chike Abuah, Tim Stevens, Pranav Gaddamadugu, Lun Wang, Neel Somani, Mu Zhang, Nikhil Sharma, Alex Shan, Dawn Song

Abstract: During the past decade, differential privacy has become the gold standard for protecting the privacy of individuals. However, verifying that a particular program provides differential privacy often remains a manual task to be completed by an expert in the field. Language-based techniques have been proposed for fully automating proofs of differential privacy via type system design, however these re… ▽ More During the past decade, differential privacy has become the gold standard for protecting the privacy of individuals. However, verifying that a particular program provides differential privacy often remains a manual task to be completed by an expert in the field. Language-based techniques have been proposed for fully automating proofs of differential privacy via type system design, however these results have lagged behind advances in differentially-private algorithms, leaving a noticeable gap in programs which can be automatically verified while also providing state-of-the-art bounds on privacy. We propose Duet, an expressive higher-order language, linear type system and tool for automatically verifying differential privacy of general-purpose higher-order programs. In addition to general purpose programming, Duet supports encoding machine learning algorithms such as stochastic gradient descent, as well as common auxiliary data analysis tasks such as clipping, normalization and hyperparameter tuning - each of which are particularly challenging to encode in a statically verified differential privacy framework. We present a core design of the Duet language and linear type system, and complete key proofs about privacy for well-typed programs. We then show how to extend Duet to support realistic machine learning applications and recent variants of differential privacy which result in improved accuracy for many practical differentially private algorithms. Finally, we implement several differentially private machine learning algorithms in Duet which have never before been automatically verified by a language-based tool, and we present experimental results which demonstrate the benefits of Duet's language design in terms of accuracy of trained machine learning models. △ Less

Submitted 5 September, 2019; originally announced September 2019.

Comments: Extended version of OOPSLA 2019 paper

Constructive Galois Connections

Authors: David Darais, David Van Horn

Abstract: Galois connections are a foundational tool for structuring abstraction in semantics and their use lies at the heart of the theory of abstract interpretation. Yet, mechanization of Galois connections using proof assistants remains limited to restricted modes of use, preventing their general application in mechanized metatheory and certified programming. This paper presents constructive Galois con… ▽ More Galois connections are a foundational tool for structuring abstraction in semantics and their use lies at the heart of the theory of abstract interpretation. Yet, mechanization of Galois connections using proof assistants remains limited to restricted modes of use, preventing their general application in mechanized metatheory and certified programming. This paper presents constructive Galois connections, a variant of Galois connections that is effective both on paper and in proof assistants; is complete with respect to a large subset of classical Galois connections; and enables more general reasoning principles, including the "calculational" style advocated by Cousot. To design constructive Galois connections we identify a restricted mode of use of classical ones which is both general and amenable to mechanization in dependently-typed functional programming languages. Crucial to our metatheory is the addition of monadic structure to Galois connections to control a "specification effect." Effectful calculations may reason classically, while pure calculations have extractable computational content. Explicitly moving between the worlds of specification and implementation is enabled by our metatheory. To validate our approach, we provide two case studies in mechanizing existing proofs from the literature: the first uses calculational abstract interpretation to design a static analyzer; the second forms a semantic basis for gradual typing. Both mechanized proofs closely follow their original paper-and-pencil counterparts, employ reasoning principles not captured by previous mechanization approaches, support the extraction of verified algorithms, and are novel. △ Less

Submitted 23 July, 2018; originally announced July 2018.

Journal ref: J. Funct. Prog. 29 (2019) e11

A Language for Probabilistically Oblivious Computation

Authors: David Darais, Ian Sweet, Chang Liu, Michael Hicks

Abstract: An oblivious computation is one that is free of direct and indirect information leaks, e.g., due to observable differences in timing and memory access patterns. This paper presents Lambda Obliv, a core language whose type system enforces obliviousness. Prior work on type-enforced oblivious computation has focused on deterministic programs. Lambda Obliv is new in its consideration of programs that… ▽ More An oblivious computation is one that is free of direct and indirect information leaks, e.g., due to observable differences in timing and memory access patterns. This paper presents Lambda Obliv, a core language whose type system enforces obliviousness. Prior work on type-enforced oblivious computation has focused on deterministic programs. Lambda Obliv is new in its consideration of programs that implement probabilistic algorithms, such as those involved in cryptography. Lambda Obliv employs a substructural type system and a novel notion of probability region to ensure that information is not leaked via the observed distribution of visible events. Probability regions support reasoning about probabilistic correlation and independence between values, and our use of probability regions is motivated by a source of unsoundness that we discovered in the type system of ObliVM, a language for implementing state of the art oblivious algorithms. We prove that Lambda Obliv's type system enforces obliviousness and show that it is expressive enough to typecheck advanced tree-based oblivious RAMs. △ Less

Submitted 12 November, 2019; v1 submitted 25 November, 2017; originally announced November 2017.

Abstracting Definitional Interpreters

Authors: David Darais, Nicholas Labich, Phuc C. Nguyen, David Van Horn

Abstract: In this functional pearl, we examine the use of definitional interpreters as a basis for abstract interpretation of higher-order programming languages. As it turns out, definitional interpreters, especially those written in monadic style, can provide a nice basis for a wide variety of collecting semantics, abstract interpretations, symbolic executions, and their intermixings. But the real insigh… ▽ More In this functional pearl, we examine the use of definitional interpreters as a basis for abstract interpretation of higher-order programming languages. As it turns out, definitional interpreters, especially those written in monadic style, can provide a nice basis for a wide variety of collecting semantics, abstract interpretations, symbolic executions, and their intermixings. But the real insight of this story is a replaying of an insight from Reynold's landmark paper, Definitional Interpreters for Higher-Order Programming Languages, in which he observes definitional interpreters enable the defined-language to inherit properties of the defining-language. We show the same holds true for definitional abstract interpreters. Remarkably, we observe that abstract definitional interpreters can inherit the so-called "pushdown control flow" property, wherein function calls and returns are precisely matched in the abstract semantics, simply by virtue of the function call mechanism of the defining-language. The first approaches to achieve this property for higher-order languages appeared within the last ten years, and have since been the subject of many papers. These approaches start from a state-machine semantics and uniformly involve significant technical engineering to recover the precision of pushdown control flow. In contrast, starting from a definitional interpreter, the pushdown control flow property is inherent in the meta-language and requires no further technical mechanism to achieve. △ Less

Submitted 15 July, 2017; originally announced July 2017.

Journal ref: Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 1, ICFP, Article 12 (September 2017)

Constructive Galois Connections: Taming the Galois Connection Framework for Mechanized Metatheory

Authors: David Darais, David Van Horn

Abstract: Galois connections are a foundational tool for structuring abstraction in semantics and their use lies at the heart of the theory of abstract interpretation. Yet, mechanization of Galois connections remains limited to restricted modes of use, preventing their general application in mechanized metatheory and certified programming. This paper presents constructive Galois connections, a variant of… ▽ More Galois connections are a foundational tool for structuring abstraction in semantics and their use lies at the heart of the theory of abstract interpretation. Yet, mechanization of Galois connections remains limited to restricted modes of use, preventing their general application in mechanized metatheory and certified programming. This paper presents constructive Galois connections, a variant of Galois connections that is effective both on paper and in proof assistants; is complete with respect to a large subset of classical Galois connections; and enables more general reasoning principles, including the "calculational" style advocated by Cousot. To design constructive Galois connection we identify a restricted mode of use of classical ones which is both general and amenable to mechanization in dependently-typed functional programming languages. Crucial to our metatheory is the addition of monadic structure to Galois connections to control a "specification effect". Effectful calculations may reason classically, while pure calculations have extractable computational content. Explicitly moving between the worlds of specification and implementation is enabled by our metatheory. To validate our approach, we provide two case studies in mechanizing existing proofs from the literature: one uses calculational abstract interpretation to design a static analyzer, the other forms a semantic basis for gradual typing. Both mechanized proofs closely follow their original paper-and-pencil counterparts, employ reasoning principles not captured by previous mechanization approaches, support the extraction of verified algorithms, and are novel. △ Less

Submitted 26 October, 2016; v1 submitted 21 November, 2015; originally announced November 2015.

Mechanically Verified Calculational Abstract Interpretation

Authors: David Darais, David Van Horn

Abstract: Calculational abstract interpretation, long advocated by Cousot, is a technique for deriving correct-by-construction abstract interpreters from the formal semantics of programming languages. This paper addresses the problem of deriving correct-by-verified-construction abstract interpreters with the use of a proof assistant. We identify several technical challenges to overcome with the aim of sup… ▽ More Calculational abstract interpretation, long advocated by Cousot, is a technique for deriving correct-by-construction abstract interpreters from the formal semantics of programming languages. This paper addresses the problem of deriving correct-by-verified-construction abstract interpreters with the use of a proof assistant. We identify several technical challenges to overcome with the aim of supporting verified calculational abstract interpretation that is faithful to existing pencil-and-paper proofs, supports calculation with Galois connections generally, and enables the extraction of verified static analyzers from these proofs. To meet these challenges, we develop a theory of Galois connections in monadic style that include a specification effect. Effectful calculations may reason classically, while pure calculations have extractable computational content. Moving between the worlds of specification and implementation is enabled by our metatheory. To validate our approach, we give the first mechanically verified proof of correctness for Cousot's "Calculational design of a generic abstract interpreter." Our proof "by calculus" closely follows the original paper-and-pencil proof and supports the extraction of a verified static analyzer. △ Less

Submitted 13 July, 2015; originally announced July 2015.

Galois Transformers and Modular Abstract Interpreters

Authors: David Darais, Matthew Might, David Van Horn

Abstract: The design and implementation of static analyzers has become increasingly systematic. Yet for a given language or analysis feature, it often requires tedious and error prone work to implement an analyzer and prove it sound. In short, static analysis features and their proofs of soundness do not compose well, causing a dearth of reuse in both implementation and metatheory. We solve the problem of… ▽ More The design and implementation of static analyzers has become increasingly systematic. Yet for a given language or analysis feature, it often requires tedious and error prone work to implement an analyzer and prove it sound. In short, static analysis features and their proofs of soundness do not compose well, causing a dearth of reuse in both implementation and metatheory. We solve the problem of systematically constructing static analyzers by introducing Galois transformers: monad transformers that transport Galois connection properties. In concert with a monadic interpreter, we define a library of monad transformers that implement building blocks for classic analysis parameters like context, path, and heap (in)sensitivity. Moreover, these can be composed together independent of the language being analyzed. Significantly, a Galois transformer can be proved sound once and for all, making it a reusable analysis component. As new analysis features and abstractions are developed and mixed in, soundness proofs need not be reconstructed, as the composition of a monad transformer stack is sound by virtue of its constituents. Galois transformers provide a viable foundation for reusable and composable metatheory for program analysis. Finally, these Galois transformers shift the level of abstraction in analysis design and implementation to a level where non-specialists have the ability to synthesize sound analyzers over a number of parameters. △ Less

Submitted 5 October, 2015; v1 submitted 14 November, 2014; originally announced November 2014.

Comments: OOPSLA '15, October 25-30, 2015, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

ACM Class: F.3.2

Yacc is dead

Authors: Matthew Might, David Darais

Abstract: We present two novel approaches to parsing context-free languages. The first approach is based on an extension of Brzozowski's derivative from regular expressions to context-free grammars. The second approach is based on a generalization of the derivative to parser combinators. The payoff of these techniques is a small (less than 250 lines of code), easy-to-implement parsing library capable of par… ▽ More We present two novel approaches to parsing context-free languages. The first approach is based on an extension of Brzozowski's derivative from regular expressions to context-free grammars. The second approach is based on a generalization of the derivative to parser combinators. The payoff of these techniques is a small (less than 250 lines of code), easy-to-implement parsing library capable of parsing arbitrary context-free grammars into lazy parse forests. Implementations for both Scala and Haskell are provided. Preliminary experiments with S-Expressions parsed millions of tokens per second, which suggests this technique is efficient enough for use in practice. △ Less

Submitted 24 October, 2010; originally announced October 2010.

Comments: 18 pages; submitted October 2009 to ESOP; rejected