Computational Limitations in Robust Classification and Win-Win Results
Authors:
Akshay Degwekar,
Preetum Nakkiran,
Vinod Vaikuntanathan
Abstract:
We continue the study of statistical/computational tradeoffs in learning robust classifiers, following the recent work of Bubeck, Lee, Price and Razenshteyn who showed examples of classification tasks where (a) an efficient robust classifier exists, in the small-perturbation regime; (b) a non-robust classifier can be learned efficiently; but (c) it is computationally hard to learn a robust classif…
▽ More
We continue the study of statistical/computational tradeoffs in learning robust classifiers, following the recent work of Bubeck, Lee, Price and Razenshteyn who showed examples of classification tasks where (a) an efficient robust classifier exists, in the small-perturbation regime; (b) a non-robust classifier can be learned efficiently; but (c) it is computationally hard to learn a robust classifier, assuming the hardness of factoring large numbers. The question of whether a robust classifier for their task exists in the large perturbation regime seems related to important open questions in computational number theory. In this work, we extend their work in three directions.
First, we demonstrate classification tasks where computationally efficient robust classification is impossible, even when computationally unbounded robust classifiers exist. For this, we rely on the existence of average-case hard functions.
Second, we show hard-to-robustly-learn classification tasks in the large-perturbation regime. Namely, we show that even though an efficient classifier that is robust to large perturbations exists, it is computationally hard to learn any non-trivial robust classifier. Our first construction relies on the existence of one-way functions, and the second on the hardness of the learning parity with noise problem. In the latter setting, not only does a non-robust classifier exist, but also an efficient algorithm that generates fresh new labeled samples given access to polynomially many training examples (termed as generation by Kearns et. al. (1994)).
Third, we show that any such counterexample implies the existence of cryptographic primitives such as one-way functions. This leads us to a win-win scenario: either we can learn an efficient robust classifier, or we can construct new instances of cryptographic primitives.
△ Less
Submitted 5 June, 2019; v1 submitted 4 February, 2019;
originally announced February 2019.
Extending Construction X for Quantum Error-Correcting Codes
Authors:
Akshay Degwekar,
Kenza Guenda,
T. Aaron Gulliver
Abstract:
In this paper we extend the work of Lisonek and Singh on construction X for quantum error-correcting codes to finite fields of order $p^2^ where p is prime. The results obtained are applied to the dual of Hermitian repeated root cyclic codes to generate new quantum error-correcting codes.
In this paper we extend the work of Lisonek and Singh on construction X for quantum error-correcting codes to finite fields of order $p^2^ where p is prime. The results obtained are applied to the dual of Hermitian repeated root cyclic codes to generate new quantum error-correcting codes.
△ Less
Submitted 20 December, 2013;
originally announced December 2013.
