-
Long-term Dynamics of Fairness Intervention in Connection Recommender Systems
Authors:
Nil-Jana Akpinar,
Cyrus DiCiccio,
Preetam Nandy,
Kinjal Basu
Abstract:
Recommender system fairness has been studied from the perspectives of a variety of stakeholders including content producers, the content itself and recipients of recommendations. Regardless of which type of stakeholders are considered, most works in this area assess the efficacy of fairness intervention by evaluating a single fixed fairness criterion through the lens of a one-shot, static setting.…
▽ More
Recommender system fairness has been studied from the perspectives of a variety of stakeholders including content producers, the content itself and recipients of recommendations. Regardless of which type of stakeholders are considered, most works in this area assess the efficacy of fairness intervention by evaluating a single fixed fairness criterion through the lens of a one-shot, static setting. Yet recommender systems constitute dynamical systems with feedback loops from the recommendations to the underlying population distributions which could lead to unforeseen and adverse consequences if not taken into account. In this paper, we study a connection recommender system patterned after the systems employed by web-scale social networks and analyze the long-term effects of intervening on fairness in the recommendations. We find that, although seemingly fair in aggregate, common exposure and utility parity interventions fail to mitigate amplification of biases in the long term. We theoretically characterize how certain fairness interventions impact the bias amplification dynamics in a stylized Pólya urn model.
△ Less
Submitted 20 September, 2022; v1 submitted 30 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Interpretable Assessment of Fairness During Model Evaluation
Authors:
Amir Sepehri,
Cyrus DiCiccio
Abstract:
For companies developing products or algorithms, it is important to understand the potential effects not only globally, but also on sub-populations of users. In particular, it is important to detect if there are certain groups of users that are impacted differently compared to others with regard to business metrics or for whom a model treats unequally along fairness concerns. In this paper, we int…
▽ More
For companies developing products or algorithms, it is important to understand the potential effects not only globally, but also on sub-populations of users. In particular, it is important to detect if there are certain groups of users that are impacted differently compared to others with regard to business metrics or for whom a model treats unequally along fairness concerns. In this paper, we introduce a novel hierarchical clustering algorithm to detect heterogeneity among users in given sets of sub-populations with respect to any specified notion of group similarity. We prove statistical guarantees about the output and provide interpretable results. We demonstrate the performance of the algorithm on real data from LinkedIn.
△ Less
Submitted 25 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.
-
A Framework for Fairness in Two-Sided Marketplaces
Authors:
Kinjal Basu,
Cyrus DiCiccio,
Heloise Logan,
Noureddine El Karoui
Abstract:
Many interesting problems in the Internet industry can be framed as a two-sided marketplace problem. Examples include search applications and recommender systems showing people, jobs, movies, products, restaurants, etc. Incorporating fairness while building such systems is crucial and can have a deep social and economic impact (applications include job recommendations, recruiters searching for can…
▽ More
Many interesting problems in the Internet industry can be framed as a two-sided marketplace problem. Examples include search applications and recommender systems showing people, jobs, movies, products, restaurants, etc. Incorporating fairness while building such systems is crucial and can have a deep social and economic impact (applications include job recommendations, recruiters searching for candidates, etc.). In this paper, we propose a definition and develop an end-to-end framework for achieving fairness while building such machine learning systems at scale. We extend prior work to develop an optimization framework that can tackle fairness constraints from both the source and destination sides of the marketplace, as well as dynamic aspects of the problem. The framework is flexible enough to adapt to different definitions of fairness and can be implemented in very large-scale settings. We perform simulations to show the efficacy of our approach.
△ Less
Submitted 23 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Achieving Fairness via Post-Processing in Web-Scale Recommender Systems
Authors:
Preetam Nandy,
Cyrus Diciccio,
Divya Venugopalan,
Heloise Logan,
Kinjal Basu,
Noureddine El Karoui
Abstract:
Building fair recommender systems is a challenging and crucial area of study due to its immense impact on society. We extended the definitions of two commonly accepted notions of fairness to recommender systems, namely equality of opportunity and equalized odds. These fairness measures ensure that equally "qualified" (or "unqualified") candidates are treated equally regardless of their protected a…
▽ More
Building fair recommender systems is a challenging and crucial area of study due to its immense impact on society. We extended the definitions of two commonly accepted notions of fairness to recommender systems, namely equality of opportunity and equalized odds. These fairness measures ensure that equally "qualified" (or "unqualified") candidates are treated equally regardless of their protected attribute status (such as gender or race). We propose scalable methods for achieving equality of opportunity and equalized odds in rankings in the presence of position bias, which commonly plagues data generated from recommender systems. Our algorithms are model agnostic in the sense that they depend only on the final scores provided by a model, making them easily applicable to virtually all web-scale recommender systems. We conduct extensive simulations as well as real-world experiments to show the efficacy of our approach.
△ Less
Submitted 11 August, 2022; v1 submitted 19 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Personalized Treatment Selection using Causal Heterogeneity
Authors:
Ye Tu,
Kinjal Basu,
Cyrus DiCiccio,
Romil Bansal,
Preetam Nandy,
Padmini Jaikumar,
Shaunak Chatterjee
Abstract:
Randomized experimentation (also known as A/B testing or bucket testing) is widely used in the internet industry to measure the metric impact obtained by different treatment variants. A/B tests identify the treatment variant showing the best performance, which then becomes the chosen or selected treatment for the entire population. However, the effect of a given treatment can differ across experim…
▽ More
Randomized experimentation (also known as A/B testing or bucket testing) is widely used in the internet industry to measure the metric impact obtained by different treatment variants. A/B tests identify the treatment variant showing the best performance, which then becomes the chosen or selected treatment for the entire population. However, the effect of a given treatment can differ across experimental units and a personalized approach for treatment selection can greatly improve upon the usual global selection strategy. In this work, we develop a framework for personalization through (i) estimation of heterogeneous treatment effect at either a cohort or member-level, followed by (ii) selection of optimal treatment variants for cohorts (or members) obtained through (deterministic or stochastic) constrained optimization.
We perform a two-fold evaluation of our proposed methods. First, a simulation analysis is conducted to study the effect of personalized treatment selection under carefully controlled settings. This simulation illustrates the differences between the proposed methods and the suitability of each with increasing uncertainty. We also demonstrate the effectiveness of the method through a real-life example related to serving notifications at Linkedin. The solution significantly outperformed both heuristic solutions and the global treatment selection baseline leading to a sizable win on top-line metrics like member visits.
△ Less
Submitted 21 December, 2020; v1 submitted 29 January, 2019;
originally announced January 2019.
