Using Physiological Information to Classify Task Difficulty in Human-Swarm Interaction
Authors:
Joseph P. Distefano,
Hemanth Manjunatha,
Souma Chowdhury,
Karthik Dantu,
David Doermann,
Ehsan T. Esfahani
Abstract:
Human-swarm interaction has recently gained attention due to its plethora of new applications in disaster relief, surveillance, rescue, and exploration. However, if the task difficulty increases, the performance of the human operator decreases, thereby decreasing the overall efficacy of the human-swarm team. Thus, it is critical to identify the task difficulty and adaptively allocate the task to t…
▽ More
Human-swarm interaction has recently gained attention due to its plethora of new applications in disaster relief, surveillance, rescue, and exploration. However, if the task difficulty increases, the performance of the human operator decreases, thereby decreasing the overall efficacy of the human-swarm team. Thus, it is critical to identify the task difficulty and adaptively allocate the task to the human operator to maintain optimal performance. In this direction, we study the classification of task difficulty in a human-swarm interaction experiment performing a target search mission. The human may control platoons of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) to search a partially observable environment during the target search mission. The mission complexity is increased by introducing adversarial teams that humans may only see when the environment is explored. While the human is completing the mission, their brain activity is recorded using an electroencephalogram (EEG), which is used to classify the task difficulty. We have used two different approaches for classification: A feature-based approach using coherence values as input and a deep learning-based approach using raw EEG as input. Both approaches can classify the task difficulty well above the chance. The results showed the importance of the occipital lobe (O1 and O2) coherence feature with the other brain regions. Moreover, we also study individual differences (expert vs. novice) in the classification results. The analysis revealed that the temporal lobe in experts (T4 and T3) is predominant for task difficulty classification compared with novices.
△ Less
Submitted 24 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
Learning Robot Swarm Tactics over Complex Adversarial Environments
Authors:
Amir Behjat,
Hemanth Manjunatha,
Prajit KrisshnaKumar,
Apurv Jani,
Leighton Collins,
Payam Ghassemi,
Joseph Distefano,
David Doermann,
Karthik Dantu,
Ehsan Esfahani,
Souma Chowdhury
Abstract:
To accomplish complex swarm robotic missions in the real world, one needs to plan and execute a combination of single robot behaviors, group primitives such as task allocation, path planning, and formation control, and mission-specific objectives such as target search and group coverage. Most such missions are designed manually by teams of robotics experts. Recent work in automated approaches to l…
▽ More
To accomplish complex swarm robotic missions in the real world, one needs to plan and execute a combination of single robot behaviors, group primitives such as task allocation, path planning, and formation control, and mission-specific objectives such as target search and group coverage. Most such missions are designed manually by teams of robotics experts. Recent work in automated approaches to learning swarm behavior has been limited to individual primitives with sparse work on learning complete missions. This paper presents a systematic approach to learn tactical mission-specific policies that compose primitives in a swarm to accomplish the mission efficiently using neural networks with special input and output encoding. To learn swarm tactics in an adversarial environment, we employ a combination of 1) map-to-graph abstraction, 2) input/output encoding via Pareto filtering of points of interest and clustering of robots, and 3) learning via neuroevolution and policy gradient approaches. We illustrate this combination as critical to providing tractable learning, especially given the computational cost of simulating swarm missions of this scale and complexity. Successful mission completion outcomes are demonstrated with up to 60 robots. In addition, a close match in the performance statistics in training and testing scenarios shows the potential generalizability of the proposed framework.
△ Less
Submitted 12 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
