Modeling Considerations for Developing Deep Space Autonomous Spacecraft and Simulators
Authors:
Christopher Agia,
Guillem Casadesus Vila,
Saptarshi Bandyopadhyay,
David S. Bayard,
Kar-Ming Cheung,
Charles H. Lee,
Eric Wood,
Ian Aenishanslin,
Steven Ardito,
Lorraine Fesq,
Marco Pavone,
Issa A. D. Nesnas
Abstract:
To extend the limited scope of autonomy used in prior missions for operation in distant and complex environments, there is a need to further develop and mature autonomy that jointly reasons over multiple subsystems, which we term system-level autonomy. System-level autonomy establishes situational awareness that resolves conflicting information across subsystems, which may necessitate the refineme…
▽ More
To extend the limited scope of autonomy used in prior missions for operation in distant and complex environments, there is a need to further develop and mature autonomy that jointly reasons over multiple subsystems, which we term system-level autonomy. System-level autonomy establishes situational awareness that resolves conflicting information across subsystems, which may necessitate the refinement and interconnection of the underlying spacecraft and environment onboard models. However, with a limited understanding of the assumptions and tradeoffs of modeling to arbitrary extents, designing onboard models to support system-level capabilities presents a significant challenge.
In this paper, we provide a detailed analysis of the increasing levels of model fidelity for several key spacecraft subsystems, with the goal of informing future spacecraft functional- and system-level autonomy algorithms and the physics-based simulators on which they are validated. We do not argue for the adoption of a particular fidelity class of models but, instead, highlight the potential tradeoffs and opportunities associated with the use of models for onboard autonomy and in physics-based simulators at various fidelity levels. We ground our analysis in the context of deep space exploration of small bodies, an emerging frontier for autonomous spacecraft operation in space, where the choice of models employed onboard the spacecraft may determine mission success. We conduct our experiments in the Multi-Spacecraft Concept and Autonomy Tool (MuSCAT), a software suite for developing spacecraft autonomy algorithms.
△ Less
Submitted 20 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
Advancing the Scientific Frontier with Increasingly Autonomous Systems
Authors:
Rashied Amini,
Abigail Azari,
Shyam Bhaskaran,
Patricia Beauchamp,
Julie Castillo-Rogez,
Rebecca Castano,
Seung Chung,
John Day,
Richard Doyle,
Martin Feather,
Lorraine Fesq,
Jeremy Frank,
P. Michael Furlong,
Michel Ingham,
Brian Kennedy,
Ksenia Kolcio,
Issa Nesnas,
Robert Rasmussen,
Glenn Reeves,
Cristina Sorice,
Bethany Theiling,
Jay Wyatt
Abstract:
A close partnership between people and partially autonomous machines has enabled decades of space exploration. But to further expand our horizons, our systems must become more capable. Increasing the nature and degree of autonomy - allowing our systems to make and act on their own decisions as directed by mission teams - enables new science capabilities and enhances science return. The 2011 Planet…
▽ More
A close partnership between people and partially autonomous machines has enabled decades of space exploration. But to further expand our horizons, our systems must become more capable. Increasing the nature and degree of autonomy - allowing our systems to make and act on their own decisions as directed by mission teams - enables new science capabilities and enhances science return. The 2011 Planetary Science Decadal Survey (PSDS) and on-going pre-Decadal mission studies have identified increased autonomy as a core technology required for future missions. However, even as scientific discovery has necessitated the development of autonomous systems and past flight demonstrations have been successful, institutional barriers have limited its maturation and infusion on existing planetary missions. Consequently, the authors and endorsers of this paper recommend that new programmatic pathways be developed to infuse autonomy, infrastructure for support autonomous systems be invested in, new practices be adopted, and the cost-saving value of autonomy for operations be studied.
△ Less
Submitted 15 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
