In Situ AI Prototyping: Infusing Multimodal Prompts into Mobile Settings with MobileMaker
Authors:
Savvas Petridis,
Michael Xieyang Liu,
Alexander J. Fiannaca,
Vivian Tsai,
Michael Terry,
Carrie J. Cai
Abstract:
Recent advances in multimodal large language models (LLMs) have lowered the barriers to rapidly prototyping AI-powered features via prompting, especially for mobile-intended use cases. Despite the value of situated user feedback, the process of soliciting early, mobile-situated user feedback on AI prototypes remains challenging. The broad scope and flexibility of LLMs means that, for a given use-c…
▽ More
Recent advances in multimodal large language models (LLMs) have lowered the barriers to rapidly prototyping AI-powered features via prompting, especially for mobile-intended use cases. Despite the value of situated user feedback, the process of soliciting early, mobile-situated user feedback on AI prototypes remains challenging. The broad scope and flexibility of LLMs means that, for a given use-case-specific prototype, there is a crucial need to understand the wide range of in-the-wild input likely to be provided by the user, as well as their in-context expectations of the AI's behavior. To explore the concept of in situ AI prototyping and testing, we created MobileMaker: an AI prototyping tool that enables designers to rapidly create mobile AI prototypes that can be tested on-device, and enables testers to make on-device, in-the-field revisions of the prototype through natural language. In an exploratory study with 16 users, we explored how user feedback on prototypes created with MobileMaker compares to that of existing prototyping tools (e.g., Figma, prompt editors). We found that MobileMaker prototypes enabled more serendipitous discovery of: model input edge cases, discrepancies between AI's and user's in-context interpretation of the task, and contextual signals missed by the AI. Furthermore, we learned that while the ability to make in-the-wild revisions led users to feel more fulfilled as active participants in the design process, it might also constrain their feedback to the subset of changes perceived as more actionable or implementable by the prototyping tool.
△ Less
Submitted 6 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
"We Need Structured Output": Towards User-centered Constraints on Large Language Model Output
Authors:
Michael Xieyang Liu,
Frederick Liu,
Alexander J. Fiannaca,
Terry Koo,
Lucas Dixon,
Michael Terry,
Carrie J. Cai
Abstract:
Large language models can produce creative and diverse responses. However, to integrate them into current developer workflows, it is essential to constrain their outputs to follow specific formats or standards. In this work, we surveyed 51 experienced industry professionals to understand the range of scenarios and motivations driving the need for output constraints from a user-centered perspective…
▽ More
Large language models can produce creative and diverse responses. However, to integrate them into current developer workflows, it is essential to constrain their outputs to follow specific formats or standards. In this work, we surveyed 51 experienced industry professionals to understand the range of scenarios and motivations driving the need for output constraints from a user-centered perspective. We identified 134 concrete use cases for constraints at two levels: low-level, which ensures the output adhere to a structured format and an appropriate length, and high-level, which requires the output to follow semantic and stylistic guidelines without hallucination. Critically, applying output constraints could not only streamline the currently repetitive process of developing, testing, and integrating LLM prompts for developers, but also enhance the user experience of LLM-powered features and applications. We conclude with a discussion on user preferences and needs towards articulating intended constraints for LLMs, alongside an initial design for a constraint prototyping tool.
△ Less
Submitted 10 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
