Scoping Review of Active Learning Strategies and their Evaluation Environments for Entity Recognition Tasks
Authors:
Philipp Kohl,
Yoka Krämer,
Claudia Fohry,
Bodo Kraft
Abstract:
We conducted a scoping review for active learning in the domain of natural language processing (NLP), which we summarize in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines as follows:
Objective: Identify active learning strategies that were proposed for entity recognition and their evaluation environments (datasets, metrics, hardware, execution time). Design: We used Scopus and ACM as our search engin…
▽ More
We conducted a scoping review for active learning in the domain of natural language processing (NLP), which we summarize in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines as follows:
Objective: Identify active learning strategies that were proposed for entity recognition and their evaluation environments (datasets, metrics, hardware, execution time). Design: We used Scopus and ACM as our search engines. We compared the results with two literature surveys to assess the search quality. We included peer-reviewed English publications introducing or comparing active learning strategies for entity recognition. Results: We analyzed 62 relevant papers and identified 106 active learning strategies. We grouped them into three categories: exploitation-based (60x), exploration-based (14x), and hybrid strategies (32x). We found that all studies used the F1-score as an evaluation metric. Information about hardware (6x) and execution time (13x) was only occasionally included. The 62 papers used 57 different datasets to evaluate their respective strategies. Most datasets contained newspaper articles or biomedical/medical data. Our analysis revealed that 26 out of 57 datasets are publicly accessible.
Conclusion: Numerous active learning strategies have been identified, along with significant open questions that still need to be addressed. Researchers and practitioners face difficulties when making data-driven decisions about which active learning strategy to adopt. Conducting comprehensive empirical comparisons using the evaluation environment proposed in this study could help establish best practices in the domain.
△ Less
Submitted 4 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
Checkpointing and Localized Recovery for Nested Fork-Join Programs
Authors:
Claudia Fohry
Abstract:
While checkpointing is typically combined with a restart of the whole application, localized recovery permits all but the affected processes to continue. In task-based cluster programming, for instance, the application can then be finished on the intact nodes, and the lost tasks be reassigned.
This extended abstract suggests to adapt a checkpointing and localized recovery technique that has orig…
▽ More
While checkpointing is typically combined with a restart of the whole application, localized recovery permits all but the affected processes to continue. In task-based cluster programming, for instance, the application can then be finished on the intact nodes, and the lost tasks be reassigned.
This extended abstract suggests to adapt a checkpointing and localized recovery technique that has originally been developed for independent tasks to nested fork-join programs. We consider a Cilk-like work stealing scheme with work-first policy in a distributed memory setting, and describe the required algorithmic changes. The original technique has checkpointing overheads below 1% and neglectable costs for recovery, we expect the new algorithm to achieve a similar performance.
△ Less
Submitted 26 February, 2021; v1 submitted 25 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
