Motion ID: Human Authentication Approach
Authors:
Aleksei Gavron,
Konstantin Belev,
Konstantin Kudelkin,
Vladislav Shikhov,
Andrey Akushevich,
Alexey Fartukov,
Vladimir Paramonov,
Dmitry Syromolotov,
Artem Makoyan
Abstract:
We introduce a novel approach to user authentication called Motion ID. The method employs motion sensing provided by inertial measurement units (IMUs), using it to verify the persons identity via short time series of IMU data captured by the mobile device. The paper presents two labeled datasets with unlock events: the first features IMU measurements, provided by six users who continuously collect…
▽ More
We introduce a novel approach to user authentication called Motion ID. The method employs motion sensing provided by inertial measurement units (IMUs), using it to verify the persons identity via short time series of IMU data captured by the mobile device. The paper presents two labeled datasets with unlock events: the first features IMU measurements, provided by six users who continuously collected data on six different smartphones for a period of 12 weeks. The second one contains 50 hours of IMU data for one specific motion pattern, provided by 101 users. Moreover, we present a two-stage user authentication process that employs motion pattern identification and user verification and is based on data preprocessing and machine learning. The Results section details the assessment of the method proposed, comparing it with existing biometric authentication methods and the Android biometric standard. The method has demonstrated high accuracy, indicating that it could be successfully used in combination with existing methods. Furthermore, the method exhibits significant promise as a standalone solution. We provide the datasets to the scholarly community and share our project code.
△ Less
Submitted 25 January, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
Argument Invention from First Principles
Authors:
Yonatan Bilu,
Ariel Gera,
Daniel Hershcovich,
Benjamin Sznajder,
Dan Lahav,
Guy Moshkowich,
Anael Malet,
Assaf Gavron,
Noam Slonim
Abstract:
Competitive debaters often find themselves facing a challenging task -- how to debate a topic they know very little about, with only minutes to prepare, and without access to books or the Internet? What they often do is rely on "first principles", commonplace arguments which are relevant to many topics, and which they have refined in past debates.
In this work we aim to explicitly define a taxon…
▽ More
Competitive debaters often find themselves facing a challenging task -- how to debate a topic they know very little about, with only minutes to prepare, and without access to books or the Internet? What they often do is rely on "first principles", commonplace arguments which are relevant to many topics, and which they have refined in past debates.
In this work we aim to explicitly define a taxonomy of such principled recurring arguments, and, given a controversial topic, to automatically identify which of these arguments are relevant to the topic.
As far as we know, this is the first time that this approach to argument invention is formalized and made explicit in the context of NLP.
The main goal of this work is to show that it is possible to define such a taxonomy. While the taxonomy suggested here should be thought of as a "first attempt" it is nonetheless coherent, covers well the relevant topics and coincides with what professional debaters actually argue in their speeches, and facilitates automatic argument invention for new topics.
△ Less
Submitted 22 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
